Jump to content

User talk:Товболатов: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 117: Line 117:
:::::Hello. When the topic ban includes "broadly construed" (also referred as "broadly interpreted") restriction, this restriction also covers attempting to "nibble around the edges" by not mentioning the topic directly, but editing or discussing in a way that can be interpreted as something to do with the topic. See [[Wikipedia:Broadly construed]].
:::::Hello. When the topic ban includes "broadly construed" (also referred as "broadly interpreted") restriction, this restriction also covers attempting to "nibble around the edges" by not mentioning the topic directly, but editing or discussing in a way that can be interpreted as something to do with the topic. See [[Wikipedia:Broadly construed]].
:::::Until you have successfully appeal this topic ban, you must stay away from that topic anywhere on Wikipedia, with exceptions stated on [[WP:BANEX]]. [[User:Stylez995|Stylez995]] ([[User talk:Stylez995|talk]]) 00:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::Until you have successfully appeal this topic ban, you must stay away from that topic anywhere on Wikipedia, with exceptions stated on [[WP:BANEX]]. [[User:Stylez995|Stylez995]] ([[User talk:Stylez995|talk]]) 00:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::Thank you for your answer, a year has already passed and they should have removed my topic-ban. This was too severe a punishment for just sending spam (once). I think even if there was a violation, I was blocked for one or two days. No sanctions were applied to those who argued with me about removing information from articles. Although these disputes existed before and after me. [[User:Товболатов|Товболатов]] ([[User talk:Товболатов#top|talk]]) 08:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::[[User:Stylez995|Stylez995]] Thank you for your answer, a year has already passed and they should have removed my topic-ban. This was too severe a punishment for just sending spam (once). I think even if there was a violation, I was blocked for one or two days. No sanctions were applied to those who argued with me about removing information from articles. Although these disputes existed before and after me. It’s clear that this is a permanent block so that I don’t participate in editing. I filed an appeal, but it didn’t help, there were a lot of different clues to keep me from getting out of the block. Sincerely.[[User:Товболатов|Товболатов]] ([[User talk:Товболатов#top|talk]]) 08:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
:::The edits you made were specifically in relation to Beterbiev's identity as a Chechen, with you yourself arguing to include information about Beterbiev's Chechen origin. I find the suggestion that you don't understand this Canadian citizen's connection to the topic of ethnic minorities of the former Soviet Union to be utterly absurd. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 23:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
:::The edits you made were specifically in relation to Beterbiev's identity as a Chechen, with you yourself arguing to include information about Beterbiev's Chechen origin. I find the suggestion that you don't understand this Canadian citizen's connection to the topic of ethnic minorities of the former Soviet Union to be utterly absurd. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill|''talk'']]</sup> 23:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)



Revision as of 08:38, 11 February 2024

Archive

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ancestral tower

Hello Товболатов

Can you provide the coordinates for Курчалоевской башни ?

Thanks. Kablammo (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your tireless contributions in expanding the coverage of Italian architecture on English Wikipedia! SSR07 (talk) 00:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, it's nice to get some appreciation! In 2014 visited many cities in Italy I liked the urban architecture. Товболатов (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Casa Atellani

If this was translated from another language, do you think you could complete the template to identify which language/article you used as a source? Thanks - I've reviewed it for now... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you.--Товболатов (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Same for Palazzo dei Vescovi a San Miniato al Monte, if you wouldn't mind? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All right. There weren't more sources in the article, yes you need to look it up but that's separate I'll get to it later.--Товболатов (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Same for Palazzo Castani - every translation requires an attribution and "translated from nl.wiki" is NOT cutting the mustard for Italian articles. I'm sure @Mccapra didn't mean flag 'em all with that one line - you need to modify the template to show the language and article source!!! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alexandermcnabb can you show me an example of the template here, please I will add it. Where to add it to the discussion page, or at the first edit of the article. specify the author of the article and the language. I got it. --Товболатов (talk) 08:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hiya. In the first edit summary when you create the page, you can add: "Content in this edit is translated from the existing (xxxx) Wikipedia article at xx:name of article; see its history for attribution." You'd for instance replace xxxx with French and xx with fr (for fr wiki). You can also add {{Translated page|fr|Exact name of the French article}} (replacing fr and French with the language you're translating from) to the talk page. Where you haven't already added the language in your first edit summary, I'd suggest just doing an additional edit now and adding that text above, which gives everyone access to the original article, its attributions etc. There's more on this at Help:Translation. Enjoy!!! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I added both to the Casa Atellani article as an example for you! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll look into it. well this is the kind of template I will add when new translated articles are first edited. I was told it can be done on the talk page or on the first edit. --Товболатов (talk) 09:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Товболатов. Thank you for your work on Bicocca degli Arcimboldi. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating and expanding the article on Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SunDawn hi, good to see you again. Thank you for the nice wishes. You have previously viewed and thanked me for this article Chechen lighthouse. You could check it, otherwise it still weighs unrecognised, you can put the start.--Товболатов (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The second source was added by me in the references. I added it as a note. Alexandermcnabb --Товболатов (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AE appeal

Hi, I'm sorry to tell you that your appeal of your topic ban has been declined. Reviewing administrators were concerned that you aren't able to communicate clearly in English or follow Wikipedia norms. While not your fault, this is nonetheless a major problem when making controversial edits in contentious areas. Administrators also felt that you had not explained why the topic ban was no longer necessary or how you would avoid problems if it was lifted. With apologies, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HJ Mitchell thank you for your apology, I really don't know how to explain any more. I don't make a tragedy out of it. Товболатов (talk) 12:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос

Ассаламу алейкум ва рахматтулахи ва баракатух @Товболатов. У тебя случайно нету доступа к Национальной электронной библиотеке ЧР? Это единственная библиотека в интернете (по крайней мере, я эту книгу только там нашёл), которая имеет при себе ценный труд[a] про ингушского революционера Гапура Ахриева, и мне как раз нужен этот труд для создания статьи про Гапура. С уважением, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 10:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ Ахриев, И. Г. (1967). Гапур Ахриев. Грозный: Чечено-Ингушское книжное издательство. pp. 1–44.
Ва1алейкум Ассалам, @WikiEditor1234567123 я посмотрю.--Товболатов (talk) 12:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violation of your topic ban from editing content related to ethnic minority groups in the former Soviet Union, broadly construed on the page Artur Beterbiev, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

signed, Rosguill talk 13:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Topic bans are broadly construed. You are not allowed to make edits relating to the ethnic identities of minorities of the former Soviet Union in any context on en.wiki. Arguing over whether Beterbiev's ethnicity should be included, and referencing the history of ethnic conflict in Dagestan on the talk page, are both violations of the ban. signed, Rosguill talk 13:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, isn't he a Canadian citizen? Other participants told me that it has nothing to do with the Caucasus. A year has passed since you blocked the topic of the Caucasus for me. I did not violate any actions. I consider the blocking unjustified; I edited the page of a Canadian citizen. Товболатов (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ethnicity is not the same as citizenship, and referencing the history of ethnic conflict in Dagestan is something else again. Hope that helps. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your attention, this was a discussion on the discussion page, I added the link there. Товболатов (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stylez995 Hello, could you help me in this situation, I don’t know the rules in the English project very well. But I edited the page of a Canadian citizen. I added the link to the discussion Talk:Artur Beterbiev. Товболатов (talk) 23:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. When the topic ban includes "broadly construed" (also referred as "broadly interpreted") restriction, this restriction also covers attempting to "nibble around the edges" by not mentioning the topic directly, but editing or discussing in a way that can be interpreted as something to do with the topic. See Wikipedia:Broadly construed.
Until you have successfully appeal this topic ban, you must stay away from that topic anywhere on Wikipedia, with exceptions stated on WP:BANEX. Stylez995 (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stylez995 Thank you for your answer, a year has already passed and they should have removed my topic-ban. This was too severe a punishment for just sending spam (once). I think even if there was a violation, I was blocked for one or two days. No sanctions were applied to those who argued with me about removing information from articles. Although these disputes existed before and after me. It’s clear that this is a permanent block so that I don’t participate in editing. I filed an appeal, but it didn’t help, there were a lot of different clues to keep me from getting out of the block. Sincerely.Товболатов (talk) 08:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The edits you made were specifically in relation to Beterbiev's identity as a Chechen, with you yourself arguing to include information about Beterbiev's Chechen origin. I find the suggestion that you don't understand this Canadian citizen's connection to the topic of ethnic minorities of the former Soviet Union to be utterly absurd. signed, Rosguill talk 23:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Товболатов (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. A year has passed since I was blocked on the topic of the former Soviet Union. I did not violate any actions. I consider the blocking to be unfounded; I edited the Canadian Citizen page. They should have warned me first, and not immediately blocked me. WikiEditor1234567123 Why is this man stalking me? 1, 2 At his request, I was banned from the topic on the USSR, now a year later, he again makes a complaint against me. Although I didn't communicate with him. This is a separate topic, he did not participate in the discussion. Here you can clearly see they want to block me forever as an unwanted user for him. Товболатов (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's no way to believably claim that "content related to ethnic minority groups in the former Soviet Union, broadly construed" does not include a person's identity as a Chechen, regardless of that person's citizenship. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.