Talk:Italian Regency of Carnaro

merge discussion

A while ago I noticed that Charter of Carnaro, as a subtopic of this article, doesn't seem to have WP:POTENTIAL, and could be merged into this article instead. Do others agree? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Italian Regency of Carnaro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070212090316/http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/hr-fiume.html to http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/hr-fiume.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.karr.net/Constitution_of_Fiume/etexts.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Italian Regency of Carnaro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110316071817/http://www.istriadalmaziacards.com/html/collezioni_sto_dett.php?IDTipo=5 to http://www.istriadalmaziacards.com/html/collezioni_sto_dett.php?IDTipo=5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Freemasonry

To say that D'Annunzio and De Ambris were Freemasons is to highlight the role of Italian Freemasonry in the Regency of Carnaro.

Connection between Fascism and Freemasonry is not so obvious. 79.20.41.90 (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

You can't "highlight" it like that. If there is a connection between the constitution of the Regency and Freemasonry, then find a reliable source that makes that point explicitly to support an explicit statement. Adding innuendo unsupported by a source is WP:OR, which is not allowed. 20:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Further reading

Dead link. JackkBrown (talk) 21:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)