Talk:The Encyclopœdia of Sexual Knowledge: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Wolfgang8741 (talk | contribs) Assessment: banner shell, Sexology and sexuality, Books (Rater) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality}}, {{WikiProject Books}}, {{WikiProject Reference works}}. Tag: |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|listas=Encyclopœdia Of Sexual Knowledge|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality |
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Books |
{{WikiProject Books|needs-infobox=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Reference works |
{{WikiProject Reference works|importance=low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
Revision as of 00:57, 14 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Encyclopœdia of Sexual Knowledge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
lemma
Is it really Encyclopœdia, not Encyclopædia? If so, there should be a remark that the original title is misspelled.--88.73.35.217 (talk) 09:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- Stub-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Stub-Class Book articles
- Book articles without infoboxes
- WikiProject Books articles
- Reference works task force articles