Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shores: Difference between revisions
Creating deletion discussion page for Shores. |
CAPTAIN RAJU (talk | contribs) Updating nomination page with notices (assisted) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Article about a band, not [[WP:RS|properly sourced]] as passing [[WP:NMUSIC]]. The only real notability claim in evidence here is that the music exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient reliable source coverage ''about'' them and their music to pass [[WP:GNG]] -- but four of the seven footnotes here are [[WP:PRIMARYSOURCES|primary sources]] that are not support for notability at all, such as their own promotional materials on the self-published website of their own record label, a Tumblr post and a Q&A interview in which a band member is talking about himself in the first person -- and what's left for reliable sources is very short blurbs, not substantive enough to add up to a GNG pass if they're ''all'' the third party coverage this band has.<br>Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have better sourcing than this, especially since the article has been tagged for notability questions since 2012 without significant improvement. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 16:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC) |
Article about a band, not [[WP:RS|properly sourced]] as passing [[WP:NMUSIC]]. The only real notability claim in evidence here is that the music exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient reliable source coverage ''about'' them and their music to pass [[WP:GNG]] -- but four of the seven footnotes here are [[WP:PRIMARYSOURCES|primary sources]] that are not support for notability at all, such as their own promotional materials on the self-published website of their own record label, a Tumblr post and a Q&A interview in which a band member is talking about himself in the first person -- and what's left for reliable sources is very short blurbs, not substantive enough to add up to a GNG pass if they're ''all'' the third party coverage this band has.<br>Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have better sourcing than this, especially since the article has been tagged for notability questions since 2012 without significant improvement. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 16:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|Bands and musicians]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Michigan|Michigan]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 16:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|Bands and musicians]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Michigan|Michigan]]. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 16:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)</small> |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Minnesota|list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 16:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 16:28, 16 February 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shores (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a band, not properly sourced as passing WP:NMUSIC. The only real notability claim in evidence here is that the music exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient reliable source coverage about them and their music to pass WP:GNG -- but four of the seven footnotes here are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as their own promotional materials on the self-published website of their own record label, a Tumblr post and a Q&A interview in which a band member is talking about himself in the first person -- and what's left for reliable sources is very short blurbs, not substantive enough to add up to a GNG pass if they're all the third party coverage this band has.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have better sourcing than this, especially since the article has been tagged for notability questions since 2012 without significant improvement. Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Michigan. Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)