Jump to content

Talk:List of Tugs characters: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 6 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Fictional characters}}, {{WikiProject Television}}, {{WikiProject Animation}}.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{afd-merged-from|List of minor Tugs characters|List of minor Tugs characters|12 February 2015}}
{{afd-merged-from|List of minor Tugs characters|List of minor Tugs characters|12 February 2015}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=List}}
{{WikiProject Fictional characters}}
{{WikiProject Television|class=List|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Television|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Lists|class=list|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Animation|class=List|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Animation|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject TUGS}}
{{WikiProject TUGS}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=AngusWOOF|date=2013-03-19}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=AngusWOOF|date=2013-03-19}}

Revision as of 16:40, 17 February 2024

Breaking Up The Page?

I know we've been messing about with this quite a lot recently but i thought i should get out my griefs before things get say, out of hand. I was just editing the page and i realised, it is VERY long. The page itself even complains about it: i get the "This page is 33kb long" message every time i edit. And its only going to get bigger once all the characters' bios have been sorted out.

Should we maybe be thinking about breaking up this page? I know this is probably a baaaaad idea, but i was thinking maybe we could have it as a list of the star fleet, list of the Z-Stacks, and the rest of the characters on the page moved into minor TUGS characters?

And even if we did do that, lets discuss it this time instead of just jumping in at the deep end. put the bold on hold...

Comments please! --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 03:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Minor and Major characters? Split it in half? --Cabe6403 (TalkSign!) 08:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You couldn't split this page into minor and major characters because there already is one. --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 13:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps a page for both of the fleets, a page for recurring characters and a page for minor characters would be the best set up... Seeing as two of the pages already exist! I'll keep an eye on this discussion... Let me know what you think. :) ZEM talk to me! 06:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A page for each fleet, a page for recurring characters, a page for minor characters? i know its four pages, but...--SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 02:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I possibly have the plan of the century to sort this problem. I'm going to list it over at the project though. Let's see if the comment function works... --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 02:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TUGS-RfC --SteelersFanUK06 ReplyOnMine! 02:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image File:Tugscaptainzero.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

False information

I really think something needs to be done about the constant claims that Britt Allcroft voiced (or 'possibly voiced') Lillie Lightship. I've taken them down more times than I can count, nearly always leaving messages telling the poster of their mistake, yet sooner or later someone comes along and reposts them again. I've seen the same thing on the Minor Characters page with Sally Seaplane. All these people are doing is misleading readers and damaging the articles' integrity. There must be some course of action we can take. 150.237.199.249 (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accent references

Can someone provide references for each of the characters' accents? They are strongly regional but difficult to verify without some production notes or interviews. -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Star Fleet major or minor?

I reverted the descriptions on whether the Star Fleet members are major or minor, and their related roles. Otherwise you would have to argue that for every character in major/minor sections, and that gets to be a highly subjective mess without any reliable references to back it up. The TV series is an ensemble cast. Some episodes focus on particular tugs, and that can be detailed in the episode list page, not the character one, unless you want to detail the tug's specific character development. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Tugs characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]