Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infraction: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:22, 9 April 2005

infraction

This is a dictionary definition, and I don't see how it can be expanded to be more than this. Thryduulf 10:19, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Week keep, since it appears as a term of legal art in Bouvier's Law Dictionary. Gazpacho 14:06, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete - it's a dicdef of legal art. -- 8^D BDAbramson ^gab 22:18, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)
Delete unless article is expanded. --Fuzzball! (talk) 01:56, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep You are going to have to delete all of the other legal definitions if you want to get rid of this one. The motivation for deletion here is political, so be honest about it.Mlorrey 05:02, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Not only is the nomination not political, I honestly don't understand how it could be. I landed on this page after following the random page link, saw it was nothing more than a dictionary definition. Following a quick google search nothing suggested to me any potential to expand it into an encyclopædia article and so I nominated it for deletion. I haven't read any of the other legal definition articles so I can't comment on them. Thryduulf 11:24, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Well, even now it is a bit more than a dicdef: the sentence about fine. Mikkalai 21:22, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Merge/redirect into legal context. Radiant _* 08:16, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
Wiktionary does not yet have this word. I don't see a way to expand it either but if some future editor does, they can easily recreate it. Transwiki. Rossami (talk) 22:12, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
keep. Expandable. E.g., an important addition would be difference in legislatures of different states. Mikkalai 02:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I have just transwikied this, see Wiktionary:Transwiki:Infraction; voters may amend their votes accordingly.--Dmcdevit 17:51, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 *'''Keep''' You are going to have to delete all of the other legal definitions if you want to get rid of this one. The motivation for deletion here is political, so be honest about it.[[User:Mlorrey|Mlorrey]] 05:02, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 **Not only is the nomination not political, I honestly don't understand how it could be. I landed on this page after following the random page link, saw it was nothing more than a dictionary definition. Following a quick google search nothing suggested to me any potential to expand it into an encyclopædia article and so I nominated it for deletion. I haven't read any of the other legal definition articles so I can't comment on them. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] 11:24, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
+**Well, even now it is a bit more than a dicdef: the sentence about fine. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 21:22, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Merge/redirect''' into legal context. [[User:Radiant!| ]][[User_talk:Radiant!|Radiant]][[meta:mergist|_*]] 08:16, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Wiktionary does not yet have this word.  I don't see a way to expand it either but if some future editor does, they can easily recreate it.  '''[[m:Transwiki|Transwiki]]'''.  [[User:Rossami|Rossami]] [[User talk:Rossami|(talk)]] 22:12, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)