Talk:Project 2025: Difference between revisions
→Delete this: Reply |
→Delete this: Reply |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
:You might be interested in reading [[Project 2025#References]], which contains 57 citations. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 02:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) |
:You might be interested in reading [[Project 2025#References]], which contains 57 citations. –[[User:Novem Linguae|<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]])</small> 02:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
::This page is mainly speculation and innuendo. Citing second hand sources. I do not think it is worthy of being an page here. I have been looking for information on Project 2025 and could not find much except what people are speculating about what it is. The references you cite are not really references, but other posts and articles that are also speculating. [[Special:Contributions/114.24.203.71|114.24.203.71]] ([[User talk:114.24.203.71|talk]]) 16:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC) |
::This page is mainly speculation and innuendo. Citing second hand sources. I do not think it is worthy of being an page here. I have been looking for information on Project 2025 and could not find much except what people are speculating about what it is. The references you cite are not really references, but other posts and articles that are also speculating. [[Special:Contributions/114.24.203.71|114.24.203.71]] ([[User talk:114.24.203.71|talk]]) 16:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::Can you provide details on the inaccuracies or unsubstantiated claims? For further reference you can read the information directly at project2025.org where you can read the book online. [[Special:Contributions/2601:CD:C600:CC00:89E4:A98A:7AE2:A442|2601:CD:C600:CC00:89E4:A98A:7AE2:A442]] ([[User talk:2601:CD:C600:CC00:89E4:A98A:7AE2:A442|talk]]) 23:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:42, 27 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Project 2025 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:WikiProject Donald Trump
|
Conspiracy theory
Why does this page read like an alt right conspiracy theory? 153.33.235.26 (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's an alt-left conspiracy theory. Those just seem to get promoted more here. 2A00:23C7:80C:8201:A54A:D65D:1635:524D (talk) 02:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Alt-left conspiracy theory? This article's primary sources are The Guardian, a centrist newspaper, The Washington Post, a gently right-leaning newspaper, and the Heritage Foundation itself saying "here's what we intend to do". 207.164.2.98 (talk) 03:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Because it's one crappy proprosla from one crappy conservative think-tank. STOP acting like it's official policy. 71.89.70.233 (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- If you look at the Project 25 website you will see that it is a consortium of many well known right wing groups. It's the expressed policy prescriptions of the movement. Any new conservative president will be pressured to adopt it. 74.69.130.29 (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- this is all of what Trump ran on in 2016, recycled talking points to manipulate the social outcry of a trump presidency 2600:1702:59E0:F050:5195:FFB6:90A9:B024 (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- If you look at the Project 25 website you will see that it is a consortium of many well known right wing groups. It's the expressed policy prescriptions of the movement. Any new conservative president will be pressured to adopt it. 74.69.130.29 (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Because it's one crappy proprosla from one crappy conservative think-tank. STOP acting like it's official policy. 71.89.70.233 (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Alt-left conspiracy theory? This article's primary sources are The Guardian, a centrist newspaper, The Washington Post, a gently right-leaning newspaper, and the Heritage Foundation itself saying "here's what we intend to do". 207.164.2.98 (talk) 03:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on Jan 4 2024
Please change year the US left the Paris climate agreement from 2015 to 2017, per the linked Wikipedia article. The agreement was signed in 2015 under Obama, US left it in 2017 under Trump. 75.161.132.114 (talk) 16:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change > has absolute power of the executive branch to > has absolute power over the executive branch 2601:1C0:5E81:BB0:986C:367:863B:151 (talk) 19:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, my formatting didn't come through legibly. I mean: please change "of" to "over" in "... has absolute power of the executive branch ..." 2601:1C0:5E81:BB0:986C:367:863B:151 (talk) 19:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done Sam Sailor 19:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Grammar fix.
Under the section "Separation of Church and State", the fragment before the quote says "A tenant of the project is: ", but it should be "A tenet of the project is: "
> A tenet is a principle held as being true, especially by an organization or a group of people. A tenant is (1) someone who pays rent to occupy property; (2) a dweller in a place; and, (3) in law, one who holds or possesses lands, tenements, or property by any kind of title. Toddvw (talk) 16:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Correction made. Good catch. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 16:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Edit article summary
It's probably not here where an edit needs to be made but I've forgotten how these things work -- basically somewhere there's data that describes the topic of the article, and when you link to this article on certain platforms then it generates a preview and pulls a summary from that data. I think it's on a different Wikimedia site?
Anyway, the current summary says the topic of this article is a "project to reform the US federal government to support Trumpism". I read this article and it seems that summary is... less than neutral and accurate. I'm hoping someone more familiar with this whole thing can fix it somehow, I don't know what I would write there instead. 82.147.162.90 (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Oh, that's what I meant: https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q122382481 82.147.162.90 (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete this
How is this even an official Wikipedia page? “Project 2025” doesn’t exist. There is no factual evidence proving anything said in this summary, and this Wikipedia page is the only online source besides the actual website that spouts this nonsense. 2600:1700:FFD0:57A0:6022:B893:1438:E1E3 (talk) 01:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- You might be interested in reading Project 2025#References, which contains 57 citations. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- This page is mainly speculation and innuendo. Citing second hand sources. I do not think it is worthy of being an page here. I have been looking for information on Project 2025 and could not find much except what people are speculating about what it is. The references you cite are not really references, but other posts and articles that are also speculating. 114.24.203.71 (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide details on the inaccuracies or unsubstantiated claims? For further reference you can read the information directly at project2025.org where you can read the book online. 2601:CD:C600:CC00:89E4:A98A:7AE2:A442 (talk) 23:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- This page is mainly speculation and innuendo. Citing second hand sources. I do not think it is worthy of being an page here. I have been looking for information on Project 2025 and could not find much except what people are speculating about what it is. The references you cite are not really references, but other posts and articles that are also speculating. 114.24.203.71 (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- B-Class American politics articles
- High-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Conservatism articles
- High-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- B-Class Pornography articles
- Low-importance Pornography articles
- B-Class Low-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles