Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/R2dra: Difference between revisions
Unsigned comment by R2dra, replacing comment position |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
What's this?? I don't get it, why have you mentioned me.{{unsigned|R2dra}} |
What's this?? I don't get it, why have you mentioned me.{{unsigned|R2dra}} |
||
If this isn't a sockpuppetry, it would definitely be a meatpuppetry. How would newly created user like User:BasedMaratha has the knowledge about reverting to a definite version, and editing about draft articles? Both User:BasedMaratha and User:R2dra are pushing POV for Rajput history, and when I made some edits and moves, they found that offensive and called me a [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Delhi_Sultanate%E2%80%93Mewar_conflicts&diff=prev&oldid=1210671547 Pro-Islamist]. I don't even understand what "Pro-Islamic" move I made. Surely not appropriate mindset for dealing with India-Pakistan contentious topic areas. Some of the articles I found both editing are<br> |
|||
1. [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Malpura&diff=prev&oldid=1210180483]:-R2dra gets a temporary block for edit warring, so BasedMaratha, a newly created account, making edits in favour of him [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Malpura&diff=prev&oldid=1210674417]<br> |
|||
2. Same here [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Lalsot&diff=prev&oldid=1210180832] R2dra gets banned, BasedMaratha editing for him [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Lalsot&diff=prev&oldid=1210408623]<br> |
|||
3. Same story here [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Maharana_Pratap&diff=prev&oldid=1210559195], R2dra's blocked phase, BasedMaratha editing in favour of him [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Maharana_Pratap&diff=prev&oldid=1210672461]<br> |
|||
4. Same again [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Bayana&diff=prev&oldid=1197961849] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Bayana&diff=prev&oldid=1210624787]<br> |
|||
5. Again the same thing [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Purandar&diff=prev&oldid=1208924862] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Purandar&diff=prev&oldid=1210618393]<br> |
|||
And per the nominator, can't unsee this as either a sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Adding a point that I wonder why none of the users who warned R2dra went for a AIV seeing all the disruptive editings they made. Once I took that to AIV, but a bot removed my report, I didn't follow that up.[[User:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color:Purple;">Imperial</span>]][[User talk:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Garamond'; color:Darkblue;"><sup><nowiki>[AFCND]</nowiki></sup></span>]] 14:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Revision as of 14:46, 28 February 2024
R2dra
R2dra (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/R2dra/Archive.
27 February 2024
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- BasedMaratha (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Kunwar2712 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Similar editing area.
- Removed redirect and created a new article [1] [2] , also see this, and creation of this draft, on teh same topic
- Restored the same edit [3] [4]
- Notice the similar writing in their profiles - "History enthusiast" "Intrested in Hindu history ", which they wrote almost in the same time frame today.
- Substantial interaction [5] Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note that the suspected sockmaster blanked the case page here. Pinging @Dreamy Jazz, Blablubbs, and DatGuy:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
What's this?? I don't get it, why have you mentioned me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by R2dra (talk • contribs)
If this isn't a sockpuppetry, it would definitely be a meatpuppetry. How would newly created user like User:BasedMaratha has the knowledge about reverting to a definite version, and editing about draft articles? Both User:BasedMaratha and User:R2dra are pushing POV for Rajput history, and when I made some edits and moves, they found that offensive and called me a Pro-Islamist. I don't even understand what "Pro-Islamic" move I made. Surely not appropriate mindset for dealing with India-Pakistan contentious topic areas. Some of the articles I found both editing are
1. [6]:-R2dra gets a temporary block for edit warring, so BasedMaratha, a newly created account, making edits in favour of him [7]
2. Same here [8] R2dra gets banned, BasedMaratha editing for him [9]
3. Same story here [10], R2dra's blocked phase, BasedMaratha editing in favour of him [11]
4. Same again [12] and [13]
5. Again the same thing [14] and [15]
And per the nominator, can't unsee this as either a sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Adding a point that I wonder why none of the users who warned R2dra went for a AIV seeing all the disruptive editings they made. Once I took that to AIV, but a bot removed my report, I didn't follow that up.Imperial[AFCND] 14:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)