Ribosomal DNA: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Added s2cid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:DNA | #UCB_Category 97/300 |
Ozzie10aaaa (talk | contribs) m Cleaned up using AutoEd |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The rRNA transcribed from the approximately 600 r[[DNA repeat]]s forms the most abundant section of RNA found in cells of [[eukaryote]]s.<ref name="Rob" /> [[Ribosome]]s are assemblies of proteins and rRNA molecules that [[Translation (biology)|translate]] [[Messenger RNA|mRNA]] molecules to produce proteins. As shown in the figure, rDNA of eukaryotes consists of a [[Tandemly arrayed genes|tandem repeat]] of a unit segment, composed of NTS, ETS, [[18S ribosomal RNA|18S]], [[ITS1]], [[5.8S]], [[ITS2]], and [[28S]] tracts. rDNA has another gene, coding for [[5S ribosomal RNA|5S]] rRNA, located in the genome in most eukaryotes.<ref name=Richard>{{cite journal | vauthors = Richard GF, Kerrest A, Dujon B | title = Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes | journal = Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews | volume = 72 | issue = 4 | pages = 686–727 | date = December 2008 | pmid = 19052325 | pmc = 2593564 | doi = 10.1128/MMBR.00011-08 }}</ref> 5S rDNA is also present in independent tandem repeats as in ''[[Drosophila]]''.<ref name=Richard/> DNA regions that are repetitive often undergo recombination events. The rDNA repeats have many regulatory mechanisms that keep the DNA from undergoing mutations, thus keeping the rDNA conserved.<ref name="Rob">{{Cite journal|last1=Warmerdam|first1=Daniël O.|last2=Wolthuis|first2=Rob M. F.|date=2019-03-01|title=Keeping ribosomal DNA intact: a repeating challenge|journal=Chromosome Research|language=en|volume=27|issue=1|pages=57–72|doi=10.1007/s10577-018-9594-z|issn=1573-6849|pmc=6394564|pmid=30556094}}</ref> |
The rRNA transcribed from the approximately 600 r[[DNA repeat]]s forms the most abundant section of RNA found in cells of [[eukaryote]]s.<ref name="Rob" /> [[Ribosome]]s are assemblies of proteins and rRNA molecules that [[Translation (biology)|translate]] [[Messenger RNA|mRNA]] molecules to produce proteins. As shown in the figure, rDNA of eukaryotes consists of a [[Tandemly arrayed genes|tandem repeat]] of a unit segment, composed of NTS, ETS, [[18S ribosomal RNA|18S]], [[ITS1]], [[5.8S]], [[ITS2]], and [[28S]] tracts. rDNA has another gene, coding for [[5S ribosomal RNA|5S]] rRNA, located in the genome in most eukaryotes.<ref name=Richard>{{cite journal | vauthors = Richard GF, Kerrest A, Dujon B | title = Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes | journal = Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews | volume = 72 | issue = 4 | pages = 686–727 | date = December 2008 | pmid = 19052325 | pmc = 2593564 | doi = 10.1128/MMBR.00011-08 }}</ref> 5S rDNA is also present in independent tandem repeats as in ''[[Drosophila]]''.<ref name=Richard/> DNA regions that are repetitive often undergo recombination events. The rDNA repeats have many regulatory mechanisms that keep the DNA from undergoing mutations, thus keeping the rDNA conserved.<ref name="Rob">{{Cite journal|last1=Warmerdam|first1=Daniël O.|last2=Wolthuis|first2=Rob M. F.|date=2019-03-01|title=Keeping ribosomal DNA intact: a repeating challenge|journal=Chromosome Research|language=en|volume=27|issue=1|pages=57–72|doi=10.1007/s10577-018-9594-z|issn=1573-6849|pmc=6394564|pmid=30556094}}</ref> |
||
In the nucleus, the rDNA region of the chromosome is visualized as a [[nucleolus]] which forms expanded chromosomal loops with rDNA. The rRNA transcriptional units are clustered in tandem repeats. These rDNA regions are also called [[nucleolus organizer region]]s, as they give rise to the nucleolus. In rDNA, the tandem repeats are mostly found in the nucleolus; but heterochromatic rDNA is found outside of the nucleolus. However, transcriptionally active rDNA resides inside of the nucleolus itself.<ref name="Rob" /> |
In the nucleus, the rDNA region of the chromosome is visualized as a [[nucleolus]] which forms expanded chromosomal loops with rDNA. The rRNA transcriptional units are clustered in tandem repeats. These rDNA regions are also called [[nucleolus organizer region]]s, as they give rise to the nucleolus. In rDNA, the tandem repeats are mostly found in the nucleolus; but heterochromatic rDNA is found outside of the nucleolus. However, transcriptionally active rDNA resides inside of the nucleolus itself.<ref name="Rob" /> |
||
== Sequence homogeneity == |
== Sequence homogeneity == |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Sequence divergence == |
== Sequence divergence == |
||
The rDNA transcription tracts have low rate of [[Gene polymorphism|polymorphism]] among species, which allows interspecific comparison to elucidate phylogenetic relationship using only a few specimens. Coding regions of rDNA are highly conserved among species but ITS regions are variable due to insertions, deletions, and point mutations. Between remote species as human and frog comparison of sequences at ITS tracts is not appropriate.<ref name=Sumida>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sumida M, Kato Y, Kurabayashi A | title = Sequencing and analysis of the internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) and coding regions in the EcoR I fragment of the ribosomal DNA of the Japanese pond frog Rana nigromaculata | journal = Genes & Genetic Systems | volume = 79 | issue = 2 | pages = 105–18 | date = April 2004 | pmid = 15215676 | doi = 10.1266/ggs.79.105 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Conserved sequences at coding regions of rDNA allow comparisons of remote species, even between yeast and human. Human 5.8S rRNA has 75% identity with yeast 5.8S rRNA.<ref name=Nazar>{{cite journal | vauthors = Nazar RN, Sitz TO, Busch H | title = Sequence homologies in mammalian 5.8S ribosomal RNA | journal = Biochemistry | volume = 15 | issue = 3 | pages = 505–8 | date = February 1976 | pmid = 1252408 | doi = 10.1021/bi00648a008 }}</ref> |
The rDNA transcription tracts have low rate of [[Gene polymorphism|polymorphism]] among species, which allows interspecific comparison to elucidate phylogenetic relationship using only a few specimens. Coding regions of rDNA are highly conserved among species but ITS regions are variable due to insertions, deletions, and point mutations. Between remote species as human and frog comparison of sequences at ITS tracts is not appropriate.<ref name=Sumida>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sumida M, Kato Y, Kurabayashi A | title = Sequencing and analysis of the internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) and coding regions in the EcoR I fragment of the ribosomal DNA of the Japanese pond frog Rana nigromaculata | journal = Genes & Genetic Systems | volume = 79 | issue = 2 | pages = 105–18 | date = April 2004 | pmid = 15215676 | doi = 10.1266/ggs.79.105 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Conserved sequences at coding regions of rDNA allow comparisons of remote species, even between yeast and human. Human 5.8S rRNA has 75% identity with yeast 5.8S rRNA.<ref name=Nazar>{{cite journal | vauthors = Nazar RN, Sitz TO, Busch H | title = Sequence homologies in mammalian 5.8S ribosomal RNA | journal = Biochemistry | volume = 15 | issue = 3 | pages = 505–8 | date = February 1976 | pmid = 1252408 | doi = 10.1021/bi00648a008 }}</ref> |
||
In cases for sibling species, comparison of the rDNA segment including ITS tracts among species and phylogenetic analysis are made satisfactorily.<ref name=ma>{{cite journal | vauthors = Fengyi MY, Jiannong X, Zheming Z | year = 1998 | title = Sequence differences of rDNA-ITS2 and species-diagnostic PCR assay of ''Anopheles sinensis'' and ''Anopheles anthropophagus'' from China | url = https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.mosquitocatalog.org/files/pdfs/MQ0115.pdf | journal = J Med Coll PLA | volume = 13 | pages = 123–128 }}</ref><ref name=Li>{{cite journal | last1 = Li | first1 = C | last2 = Lee | first2 = JS | last3 = Groebner | first3 = JL | last4 = Kim | first4 = HC | last5 = Klein | first5 = TA | last6 = O'Guinn | first6 = ML | last7 = Wilkerson | first7 = RC | year = 2005 | title = A newly recognized species in the ''Anopheles'' hyrcanus group and molecular identification of related species from the Republic of South Korea (Diptera: Culicidae) | url = https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA505037.pdf | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121001222507/http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA505037 | url-status = live | archive-date = October 1, 2012 | journal = Zootaxa | volume = 939 | pages = 1–8 | doi=10.11646/zootaxa.939.1.1| doi-access = free }}</ref> |
In cases for sibling species, comparison of the rDNA segment including ITS tracts among species and phylogenetic analysis are made satisfactorily.<ref name=ma>{{cite journal | vauthors = Fengyi MY, Jiannong X, Zheming Z | year = 1998 | title = Sequence differences of rDNA-ITS2 and species-diagnostic PCR assay of ''Anopheles sinensis'' and ''Anopheles anthropophagus'' from China | url = https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.mosquitocatalog.org/files/pdfs/MQ0115.pdf | journal = J Med Coll PLA | volume = 13 | pages = 123–128 }}</ref><ref name=Li>{{cite journal | last1 = Li | first1 = C | last2 = Lee | first2 = JS | last3 = Groebner | first3 = JL | last4 = Kim | first4 = HC | last5 = Klein | first5 = TA | last6 = O'Guinn | first6 = ML | last7 = Wilkerson | first7 = RC | year = 2005 | title = A newly recognized species in the ''Anopheles'' hyrcanus group and molecular identification of related species from the Republic of South Korea (Diptera: Culicidae) | url = https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA505037.pdf | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121001222507/http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA505037 | url-status = live | archive-date = October 1, 2012 | journal = Zootaxa | volume = 939 | pages = 1–8 | doi=10.11646/zootaxa.939.1.1| doi-access = free }}</ref> |
||
The different coding regions of the rDNA repeats usually show distinct evolutionary rates. As a result, this DNA can provide phylogenetic information of species belonging to wide systematic levels.<ref name=Hillis>{{cite journal | vauthors = Hillis DM, Dixon MT | title = Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference | journal = The Quarterly Review of Biology | volume = 66 | issue = 4 | pages = 411–53 | date = December 1991 | pmid = 1784710 | doi = 10.1086/417338 | s2cid = 32027097 }}</ref> |
The different coding regions of the rDNA repeats usually show distinct evolutionary rates. As a result, this DNA can provide phylogenetic information of species belonging to wide systematic levels.<ref name=Hillis>{{cite journal | vauthors = Hillis DM, Dixon MT | title = Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference | journal = The Quarterly Review of Biology | volume = 66 | issue = 4 | pages = 411–53 | date = December 1991 | pmid = 1784710 | doi = 10.1086/417338 | s2cid = 32027097 }}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 15:17, 28 February 2024
 |
.png)
Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is a DNA sequence that codes for ribosomal RNA. These sequences regulate transcription initiation and amplification, and contain both transcribed and non-transcribed spacer segments.
In the human genome there are 5 chromosomes with nucleolus organizer regions: the acrocentric chromosomes 13 (RNR1), 14 (RNR2), 15 (RNR3), 21 (RNR4) and 22 (RNR5). The genes that are responsible for encoding the various sub-units of rRNA are located across multiple chromosomes in humans. But the genes that encode for rRNA are highly conserved across the domains, with only the copy numbers involved for the genes having varying numbers per species.[1] In Bacteria, Archaea, and chloroplasts the rRNA is composed of different (smaller) units, the large (23S) ribosomal RNA, 16S ribosomal RNA and 5S rRNA. The 16S rRNA is widely used for phylogenetic studies.[2]
Eukaryotes
The rRNA transcribed from the approximately 600 rDNA repeats forms the most abundant section of RNA found in cells of eukaryotes.[1] Ribosomes are assemblies of proteins and rRNA molecules that translate mRNA molecules to produce proteins. As shown in the figure, rDNA of eukaryotes consists of a tandem repeat of a unit segment, composed of NTS, ETS, 18S, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, and 28S tracts. rDNA has another gene, coding for 5S rRNA, located in the genome in most eukaryotes.[3] 5S rDNA is also present in independent tandem repeats as in Drosophila.[3] DNA regions that are repetitive often undergo recombination events. The rDNA repeats have many regulatory mechanisms that keep the DNA from undergoing mutations, thus keeping the rDNA conserved.[1]
In the nucleus, the rDNA region of the chromosome is visualized as a nucleolus which forms expanded chromosomal loops with rDNA. The rRNA transcriptional units are clustered in tandem repeats. These rDNA regions are also called nucleolus organizer regions, as they give rise to the nucleolus. In rDNA, the tandem repeats are mostly found in the nucleolus; but heterochromatic rDNA is found outside of the nucleolus. However, transcriptionally active rDNA resides inside of the nucleolus itself.[1]
Sequence homogeneity
In the large rDNA array, polymorphisms between rDNA repeat units are very low, indicating that rDNA tandem arrays are evolving through concerted evolution.[3] However, the mechanism of concerted evolution is imperfect, such that polymorphisms between repeats within an individual can occur at significant levels and may confound phylogenetic analyses for closely related organisms.[4][5]
5S tandem repeat sequences in several Drosophila were compared with each other; the result revealed that insertions and deletions occurred frequently between species and often flanked by conserved sequences.[6] They could occur by slippage of the newly synthesized strand during DNA replication or by gene conversion.[6]
Sequence divergence
The rDNA transcription tracts have low rate of polymorphism among species, which allows interspecific comparison to elucidate phylogenetic relationship using only a few specimens. Coding regions of rDNA are highly conserved among species but ITS regions are variable due to insertions, deletions, and point mutations. Between remote species as human and frog comparison of sequences at ITS tracts is not appropriate.[7] Conserved sequences at coding regions of rDNA allow comparisons of remote species, even between yeast and human. Human 5.8S rRNA has 75% identity with yeast 5.8S rRNA.[8] In cases for sibling species, comparison of the rDNA segment including ITS tracts among species and phylogenetic analysis are made satisfactorily.[9][10] The different coding regions of the rDNA repeats usually show distinct evolutionary rates. As a result, this DNA can provide phylogenetic information of species belonging to wide systematic levels.[11]
Recombination-stimulating activity
A fragment of yeast rDNA containing the 5S gene, non-transcribed spacer DNA, and part of the 35S gene has localized cis-acting mitotic recombination stimulating activity.[12] This DNA fragment contains a mitotic recombination hotspot, referred to as HOT1. HOT1 expresses recombination-stimulating activity when it is inserted into novel locations in the yeast genome. HOT1 includes an RNA polymerase I (PolI) transcription promoter that catalyzes 35S ribosomal rRNA gene transcription. In a PolI defective mutant, the HOT1 hotspot recombination-stimulating activity is abolished. The level of PolI transcription in HOT1 appears to determine the level of recombination.[13]
Clinical significance
Diseases can be associated with DNA mutations where DNA can be expanded, such as Huntington's disease, or lost due to deletion mutations. The same is true for mutations that occur in rDNA repeats; it has been found that if the genes that are associated with the synthesis of ribosomes are disrupted or mutated, it can result in various diseases associated with the skeleton or bone marrow. Also, any damage or disruption to the enzymes that protect the tandem repeats of the rDNA, can result in lower synthesis of ribosomes, which also lead to other defects in the cell. Neurological diseases can also arise from mutations in the rDNA tandem repeats, such as Bloom syndrome, which occurs when the number of tandem repeats increases close to a hundred-fold; compared with that of the normal number of tandem repeats. Various types of cancers can also be born from mutations of the tandem repeats in the ribosomal DNA. Cell lines can become malignant from either a rearrangement of the tandem repeats, or an expansion of the repeats in the rDNA.[14]
References
- ^ a b c d Warmerdam, Daniël O.; Wolthuis, Rob M. F. (2019-03-01). "Keeping ribosomal DNA intact: a repeating challenge". Chromosome Research. 27 (1): 57–72. doi:10.1007/s10577-018-9594-z. ISSN 1573-6849. PMC 6394564. PMID 30556094.
- ^ Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (January 1991). "16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study". Journal of Bacteriology. 173 (2): 697–703. doi:10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991. PMC 207061. PMID 1987160.
- ^ a b c Richard GF, Kerrest A, Dujon B (December 2008). "Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 72 (4): 686–727. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00011-08. PMC 2593564. PMID 19052325.
- ^ Alvarez I, Wendel JF (December 2003). "Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 29 (3): 417–34. doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00208-2. PMID 14615184.
- ^ Weitemier K, Straub SC, Fishbein M, Liston A (2015). "Intragenomic polymorphisms among high-copy loci: a genus-wide study of nuclear ribosomal DNA in Asclepias (Apocynaceae)". PeerJ. 3: e718. doi:10.7717/peerj.718. PMC 4304868. PMID 25653903.
- ^ a b Päques F, Samson ML, Jordan P, Wegnez M (November 1995). "Structural evolution of the Drosophila 5S ribosomal genes". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 41 (5): 615–21. Bibcode:1995JMolE..41..615P. doi:10.1007/bf00175820. PMID 7490776. S2CID 6911205.
- ^ Sumida M, Kato Y, Kurabayashi A (April 2004). "Sequencing and analysis of the internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) and coding regions in the EcoR I fragment of the ribosomal DNA of the Japanese pond frog Rana nigromaculata". Genes & Genetic Systems. 79 (2): 105–18. doi:10.1266/ggs.79.105. PMID 15215676.
- ^ Nazar RN, Sitz TO, Busch H (February 1976). "Sequence homologies in mammalian 5.8S ribosomal RNA". Biochemistry. 15 (3): 505–8. doi:10.1021/bi00648a008. PMID 1252408.
- ^ Fengyi MY, Jiannong X, Zheming Z (1998). "Sequence differences of rDNA-ITS2 and species-diagnostic PCR assay of Anopheles sinensis and Anopheles anthropophagus from China" (PDF). J Med Coll PLA. 13: 123–128.
- ^ Li, C; Lee, JS; Groebner, JL; Kim, HC; Klein, TA; O'Guinn, ML; Wilkerson, RC (2005). "A newly recognized species in the Anopheles hyrcanus group and molecular identification of related species from the Republic of South Korea (Diptera: Culicidae)" (PDF). Zootaxa. 939: 1–8. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.939.1.1. Archived from the original on October 1, 2012.
- ^ Hillis DM, Dixon MT (December 1991). "Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 66 (4): 411–53. doi:10.1086/417338. PMID 1784710. S2CID 32027097.
- ^ Keil RL, Roeder GS (December 1984). "Cis-acting, recombination-stimulating activity in a fragment of the ribosomal DNA of S. cerevisiae". Cell. 39 (2 Pt 1): 377–86. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90016-3. PMID 6094015.
- ^ Serizawa N, Horiuchi T, Kobayashi T (April 2004). "Transcription-mediated hyper-recombination in HOT1". Genes to Cells. 9 (4): 305–15. doi:10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00729.x. PMID 15066122. S2CID 23978914.
- ^ Warmerdam DO, Wolthuis RM (March 2019). "Keeping ribosomal DNA intact: a repeating challenge". Chromosome Research. 27 (1–2): 57–72. doi:10.1007/s10577-018-9594-z. PMC 6394564. PMID 30556094.