Talk:Law of attraction (New Thought): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:37, 28 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Law of attraction (New Thought) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 12 months

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on June 27, 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Proctor source

Legendary Law of Attraction Expert, Bob Proctor, Shares His Secrets on Navigating The Clickety Clack: How to Live a Peace-Filled Life in a Seemingly Toxic World does not sound like something we should cite. The link is dead, so I know only the header. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, hardly sounds impartial. MrEarlGray (talk) 05:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Lucky Girl syndrome" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lucky Girl syndrome has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 15 § Lucky Girl syndrome until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A consensus has now been reached. Rp2006 (talk) 06:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky girl syndrome

I learned of a phrase called “lucky girl syndrome” which has been viral on TikTok for several years and was not otherwise mentioned on the Law of Attraction Wikipedia page (which already covers associated terms like The Secret and "manifestation"). So I made a redirect to that page for the new phrase. An editor disagreed that the two things had anything in common, and marked my REDIRECT for deletion… so it is now up for discussion. So today I decided to go another route and add material to this page concerning lucky girl syndrome. So after reading what I have added, let me know your thoughts. Am I off base linking the two concepts? It seems to me the linking of the names has been written about in the media. Or should this be moved to a new page? You can also comment on the REDIRECT deletion here. Rp2006 (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After a deletion discussion, the decision was to keep the redirect. Rp2006 (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Pygmalion Effect

These (law of attraction and the pygmalion effect) are pretty much the same, aren't they? Matayanka (talk) 07:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Pygmalion Effect is about performance of a person being influenced by their attitude. Law of attraction is about their luck being influenced by their attitude. The first is reasonable, the second is stupid.

And this is not a forum. It is for improving the article. We would not use your claim that those two are the same in the article even if it were correct, because it would be WP:OR. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 :No. [[Pygmalion Effect]] is about performance of a person being influenced by their attitude. Law of attraction is about their luck being influenced by their attitude. The first is reasonable, the second is stupid.
 :And this is not a forum. It is for improving the article. We would not use your claim that those two are the same in the article even if it were correct, because it would be [[WP:OR]]. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 08:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
-==Wiki Education assignment: English 102 Section 4==
-{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Allen_University/English_102_Section_4_(Spring_2024) | assignments = [[User:MalikChanel|MalikChanel]] | start_date = 2024-01-09 | end_date = 2024-05-03 }}
-<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:DoctorBeee|DoctorBeee]] ([[User talk:DoctorBeee|talk]]) 19:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)</span>