Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/R2dra: Difference between revisions
Phoenixdad (talk | contribs) →Comments by other users: Reverted unexplained edit by Advancings Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Comment (using spihelper.js) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*I've blocked Mughalised without a tag. My interest was triggered by a report again them at [[WP:AN3]]. This report is a bit messy, and I have not had the time to look at the other suspected socks. I would like to highlight that there's been some confusing disruptive editing (including refactoring) by {{checkuser|Phoenixdad}} and {{checkuser|Advancings}}. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 15:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 15:19, 4 March 2024
R2dra
R2dra (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/R2dra/Archive.
27 February 2024
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- BasedMaratha (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Kunwar2712 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- HinduHistoryEnjoyer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Mughalised (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Similar editing area.
- Removed redirect and created a new article [1] [2] , also see this, and creation of this draft, on teh same topic
- Restored the same edit [3] [4]
- Notice the similar writing in their profiles - "History enthusiast" "Intrested in Hindu history ", which they wrote almost in the same time frame today.
- Substantial interaction [5] Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note that the suspected sockmaster blanked the case page here. Pinging @Dreamy Jazz, Blablubbs, and DatGuy:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Adding another for restoring a similar link to the deleted (redirect) page [6]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
What's this?? I don't get it, why have you mentioned me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by R2dra (talk • contribs)
If this isn't a sockpuppetry, it would definitely be a meatpuppetry. How would a newly created user like User:BasedMaratha has the knowledge about reverting to a definite version, and editing about draft articles? Both User:BasedMaratha and User:R2dra are pushing POV for Rajput history, and when I made some edits and moves, they found that offensive and called me a Pro-Islamist. I don't even understand what "Pro-Islamic" move I made. Surely not an appropriate mindset for dealing with India-Pakistan contentious topic areas. Some of the articles I found both editing are
1. [7]:-R2dra gets a temporary block for edit warring, so BasedMaratha, a newly created account, making edits in favour of him [8]
2. Same here [9] R2dra gets banned, BasedMaratha editing for him [10]
3. Same story here [11], R2dra's blocked phase, BasedMaratha editing in favour of him [12]
4. Same again [13] and [14]
5. Again the same thing [15] and [16]
And per the nominator, can't unsee this as either a sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. Adding a point that I wonder why none of the users who warned R2dra went for a AIV seeing all the disruptive editings they made. Once I took that to AIV, but a bot removed my report, I didn't follow that up.Imperial[AFCND] 14:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
User:R2dra is currently blocked due to disruptive editing. I made a comment on their talk page for calling an editor "jerk" for no reason [17]. And he replied with a harsh comment [18]. After few times, surprisingly, another account was created named User:Mughalised and replied with the same comment I made on their talk page, just by changing the targets, on another talk page, where R2dra is also involved [19]. Both are doing POV pushing for Mewar/Rajputs.--Imperial[AFCND] 13:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Advancings is also one. (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I've blocked Mughalised without a tag. My interest was triggered by a report again them at WP:AN3. This report is a bit messy, and I have not had the time to look at the other suspected socks. I would like to highlight that there's been some confusing disruptive editing (including refactoring) by Phoenixdad (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Advancings (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)