Talk:Project 2025

Conspiracy theory

Why does this page read like an alt right conspiracy theory? 153.33.235.26 (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

It's an alt-left conspiracy theory. Those just seem to get promoted more here. 2A00:23C7:80C:8201:A54A:D65D:1635:524D (talk) 02:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Alt-left conspiracy theory? This article's primary sources are The Guardian, a centrist newspaper, The Washington Post, a gently right-leaning newspaper, and the Heritage Foundation itself saying "here's what we intend to do". 207.164.2.98 (talk) 03:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Because it's one crappy proprosla from one crappy conservative think-tank. STOP acting like it's official policy. 71.89.70.233 (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

If you look at the Project 25 website you will see that it is a consortium of many well known right wing groups. It's the expressed policy prescriptions of the movement. Any new conservative president will be pressured to adopt it. 74.69.130.29 (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

this is all of what Trump ran on in 2016, recycled talking points to manipulate the social outcry of a trump presidency 2600:1702:59E0:F050:5195:FFB6:90A9:B024 (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit article summary

It's probably not here where an edit needs to be made but I've forgotten how these things work -- basically somewhere there's data that describes the topic of the article, and when you link to this article on certain platforms then it generates a preview and pulls a summary from that data. I think it's on a different Wikimedia site?

Anyway, the current summary says the topic of this article is a "project to reform the US federal government to support Trumpism". I read this article and it seems that summary is... less than neutral and accurate. I'm hoping someone more familiar with this whole thing can fix it somehow, I don't know what I would write there instead. 82.147.162.90 (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Oh, that's what I meant: https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q122382481 82.147.162.90 (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Delete this

How is this even an official Wikipedia page? “Project 2025” doesn’t exist. There is no factual evidence proving anything said in this summary, and this Wikipedia page is the only online source besides the actual website that spouts this nonsense. 2600:1700:FFD0:57A0:6022:B893:1438:E1E3 (talk) 01:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

You might be interested in reading Project 2025#References, which contains 57 citations. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

This page is mainly speculation and innuendo. Citing second hand sources. I do not think it is worthy of being an page here. I have been looking for information on Project 2025 and could not find much except what people are speculating about what it is. The references you cite are not really references, but other posts and articles that are also speculating. 114.24.203.71 (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Can you provide details on the inaccuracies or unsubstantiated claims? For further reference you can read the information directly at project2025.org where you can read the book online. 2601:CD:C600:CC00:89E4:A98A:7AE2:A442 (talk) 23:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

I looked at the section "Mass deportation of immigrants". Those claims I did not see substantiated by Project 2025. I looked at "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise", I assume that is the book you referenced on their site.

That section talked about "deputizing National Guard" and deputizing DEA, ATF local police and sheriffs. There was only one footnote that even mentioned the "Drug Enforcement Administration" in the whole thing.

The section talked about deportation, yet deportation was only mentioned twice in the document. I looked for similar terms like 'removal' and saw nothing like what was described.

Claims about Project2025 should be taken from the book or from statements put out by the organization. What we have here is editors speculation on what could , possibly, maybe be happening in a project from some other people speculating on the internet. 114.24.203.71 (talk) 09:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Conspiracy? Or is it true?

I honestly think it's a conspiracy and I've never seen this, even when Trump left the presidency from,we haven't seen this in 2022 Kilrk0 (talk) 02:36, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

I would like to know why it's impossible to find any background information, or just general information, on the 3 people who comprise the "Project 2025 Team" (Paul Dans, Spencer Chretien, Troup Hemenway)

https://www.project2025.org/about/about-project-2025/

That seems pretty odd to me... Any thoughts? 2600:6C51:437F:F9E2:F88A:E1F9:6568:47A6 (talk) 08:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Reactions section

There may be WP:UNDUE weight given to criticism in the reactions section. Every single reaction mentioned is critical. It seems unlikely that no sources have had anything else to say about it. 71.255.142.122 (talk) 21:10, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I looked for positive reactions but could not find any. I encourage others to try. it's interesting that the Trump campaign seems to have asked the Project to stop talking about it. soibangla (talk) 21:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

it appears Biden is preparing to use it against Trump[1] soibangla (talk) 22:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)