Jump to content

User talk:Ldm1954: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
OneClickArchived "Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Vallacher has been accepted" to User talk:Ldm1954/Archive 2
AmyEBHC (talk | contribs)
~~~~ AmyEBHC Responded to reinstatement of template before filing dispute resolution and a formal complaint
Line 30: Line 30:


:As I said, he needs a major awards from the international scientific community that recognizes him. Neither the local Turkish ranking nor the Stanford list are international peer recognition. [[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954#top|talk]]) 23:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
:As I said, he needs a major awards from the international scientific community that recognizes him. Neither the local Turkish ranking nor the Stanford list are international peer recognition. [[User:Ldm1954|Ldm1954]] ([[User talk:Ldm1954#top|talk]]) 23:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

== Benjamin Djulbegovic page and unjustified use of template ==


'''This article has multiple issues.''' Please help '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Benjamin_Djulbegovic&action=edit improve it]''' or discuss these issues on the '''[[Talk:Benjamin Djulbegovic|talk page]]'''. <small>''([[Help:Maintenance template removal|Learn how and when to remove these template messages]]). I corrected the issues and removed the template. You put the template back without checking for corrections or modifying the template.. It also could have been discussed on the talk page as Wikipedia suggests. This is not what you did.''</small>
{| class="wikitable"
|This article '''needs attention from an expert in Medicine'''. The specific problem is: '''There were three fake sources to statements in this article; it would be good to have an expert read this over to check that these were just minor mistakes..''' ''(February 2024)''
|}
I fixed all references before you put this up again. No one should have to deal with sock puppets and then this lack of concern or respect. As editors, it is appropriate to be respectful and not make spurious assumptions. On checking your own page, there are problems and dead links. I am an expert in medicine. I earned my doctorate from Oxford. and I am a BMJ research editor. I have checked your history and you have made a habit of leaving negative feedback.
{| class="wikitable"
|This article '''is an [[Wikipedia:Orphan|orphan]], as no other articles [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&target=Benjamin_Djulbegovic&namespace=0 link to it]'''. Please [[Help:Link|introduce links]] to this page from [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=1&search=Benjamin+Djulbegovic&fulltext=Search&ns0=1&title=Special%3ASearch&advanced=1&fulltext=Benjamin+Djulbegovic related articles]; try the [https://edwardbetts.com/find_link?q=Benjamin_Djulbegovic Find link tool] for suggestions. ''(February 2024)''
|}
It is linked, if you do a search, you will see at least 5 pages that have cited this research and I have linked to many existing pages in the edits which also cite some of this Scientist's work.
{| class="wikitable"
|This article '''contains content that is written like [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion|an advertisement]]'''. ''(March 2024)''
|}
That is your assumption and not truth, Good intent would be respectfully adding concerns to the talk page, where they could be addressed with collegiality and respect. What you have done lands as bullying and lands as offensive. I have checked other pages you have interacted with and I see the same patterns.
{| class="wikitable"
|This article '''is an [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|autobiography]] or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject'''. ''(March 2024)''
|}
That is a false assumption, and you need to remove this, thank you, [[User:AmyEBHC|AmyEBHC]] ([[User talk:AmyEBHC|talk]]) 03:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:27, 12 March 2024

Draft about Mohammed Sultan Al-Buriahi

Hello,


You've rejected our Mohammed Sultan Al-Buriahi article. I understand your message:

I am very concerned about this page. He has an astonishingly high h-factor for someone who finished their PhD in 2019 and a huge publication rate (~400 total in Google Scholar), 29 in 2024 up to Feb 19. If there were awards from major organisations that recognize him then I would acknowledge him as a rising star. Neither the "Rising Star" nor top 2% judge him in the context of his peers. Without this acknowledgement I think we must wait.

It can be seen in the provided Research.com link in the article, he has been selected to "Best Rising Stars of Science in Turkey 2023 Ranking" list in 7th place. They gathered that information from "Microsoft Academic Graph on 21-12-2022.". I really don't understand why you rejected this.

This "Top 2% Scientists Worldwide 2023 by Stanford University" published on Elsevier by Stanford University." is also a question in my mind. In Elsevier page, there is a downloadable huge Excel database which shows literally top 2% scientist. Mohammed Sultan Al-Buriahi's name is also in this list.

As of the message I'm sending to you now, he has "10331" citations. What do you suggest me to do in order to make the editors and you accept this article?

Waiting for your response.

Have a good day. Ugurbaskin (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, he needs a major awards from the international scientific community that recognizes him. Neither the local Turkish ranking nor the Stanford list are international peer recognition. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Djulbegovic page and unjustified use of template

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages). I corrected the issues and removed the template. You put the template back without checking for corrections or modifying the template.. It also could have been discussed on the talk page as Wikipedia suggests. This is not what you did.

This article needs attention from an expert in Medicine. The specific problem is: There were three fake sources to statements in this article; it would be good to have an expert read this over to check that these were just minor mistakes.. (February 2024)

I fixed all references before you put this up again. No one should have to deal with sock puppets and then this lack of concern or respect. As editors, it is appropriate to be respectful and not make spurious assumptions. On checking your own page, there are problems and dead links. I am an expert in medicine. I earned my doctorate from Oxford. and I am a BMJ research editor. I have checked your history and you have made a habit of leaving negative feedback.

This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (February 2024)

It is linked, if you do a search, you will see at least 5 pages that have cited this research and I have linked to many existing pages in the edits which also cite some of this Scientist's work.

This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (March 2024)

That is your assumption and not truth, Good intent would be respectfully adding concerns to the talk page, where they could be addressed with collegiality and respect. What you have done lands as bullying and lands as offensive. I have checked other pages you have interacted with and I see the same patterns.

This article is an autobiography or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject. (March 2024)

That is a false assumption, and you need to remove this, thank you, AmyEBHC (talk) 03:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]