Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 March 15: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Luxury real estate: edit reply to SportingFlyer |
→Luxury real estate: Reply to ping |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*It's a correctly closed seven-year-old discussion, what exactly are you asking us to do here? [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 13:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC) |
*It's a correctly closed seven-year-old discussion, what exactly are you asking us to do here? [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 13:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
*:{{smalldiv|1=...Reinstate the article? Er. I was told by {{ping|Thryduulf}} over at RfD that this was the proper method of getting a previously-deleted-by-AfD article reinstated. Did I screw up here? [[User:Lunamann|𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱]] ([[User talk:Lunamann|talk]]) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)}} |
*:{{smalldiv|1=...Reinstate the article? Er. I was told by {{ping|Thryduulf}} over at RfD that this was the proper method of getting a previously-deleted-by-AfD article reinstated. Did I screw up here? [[User:Lunamann|𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱]] ([[User talk:Lunamann|talk]]) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)}} |
||
*::I hadn't looked closely enough at the AfD to realise it was that old and assumed it was recent. I have no further opinion on the merits or otherwise of overturning the decision. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 14:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:05, 15 March 2024
Little to any actual policy-based reasoning was used in this discussion, nor had any discussion taken place concerning the actual contents of the article-- the nominator simply compared the name of the article and proposed redirect target with the names of another article and redirect, and of the only two participants, one merely gave a WP:PERNOM vote, while the other participant suggested that a mention within the new target article would suffice. Closing admin performed a WP:BLAR as per nom, without adding anything to the new target article as per the second participant. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 13:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's a correctly closed seven-year-old discussion, what exactly are you asking us to do here? SportingFlyer T·C 13:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- ...Reinstate the article? Er. I was told by @Thryduulf: over at RfD that this was the proper method of getting a previously-deleted-by-AfD article reinstated. Did I screw up here? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- I hadn't looked closely enough at the AfD to realise it was that old and assumed it was recent. I have no further opinion on the merits or otherwise of overturning the decision. Thryduulf (talk) 14:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)