User talk:SMargan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:38, 23 March 2024

ICCPR article

I apparently intruded on a series of edits-in-progress you were making to this article as explained here. Please do look at that explanation, as it voices the concerns which the intrusion grew out of. As I explained there, I'm just going to back out of the way at this point rather than possibly conflict my edits with yours. This note is to let you know that you may need to re-edit the bits which I touched during your series of edits. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Margan [SMargan] - Thanks for your message. That was me! I am not sure how to correspond with you so I hope you get this message. I am researching the cases concerning the covenant, but was unable to find the particular rights in the list I was adding information about. It seemed to enumerate the rights up until a certain point and then stop. It also had a few sentence construction errors, but I assume it was because you were in the middle of editing that section. I was intending to provide further cases on the rights I had added. If this is a problem let me know. I am new to logging in and using Wikipedia so bare with me. Up until now my additions have been unanimous. Therefore, in summary, feel free to touch up any of the edits I make. I am hoping they will have some use, so that they do not just get deleted.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, SMargan! I am Ajbpearce and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Ajbpearce (talk) 19:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Why Hyena Has Short Back Legs concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Why Hyena Has Short Back Legs, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Why Hyena Has Short Back Legs

Hello, SMargan. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Why Hyena Has Short Back Legs".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Why Hyena Has Short Back Legs}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex marriage

Please do not make disruptive edits such as the one you made on Same-sex marriage. The article was protected specifically to prevent the addition of Australia before any legislation is enacted since the vote was not binding. Yes Malcolm Turnbull wants same-sex marriage to be legislated before christmas, but that is not confirmation so please do not present it as such in articles. Bennv3771 (talk) 02:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SMargan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding an edit war at List of Dora the Explorer home video releases

Hi SMargan,

thank you very much for maintaining the List of Dora the Explorer home video releases. I see there has been quite some frustration with an editor who refuses to discuss. I also notice that you have correctly used the list's talk page to discuss these changes, but have been ignored. When you are in such a situation, please still keep the edit warring policy in mind. I personally recommend the following essay: Wikipedia:Responding to a failure to discuss.

Thanks again and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ToBeFree,

Your thanks are much appreciated, as were your actions to resolve this matter! You are correct when you say that I had some frustration in editing. I made what I thought were some innocuous formatting changes and Region 4 addition changes in the table on List of Dora the Explorer home video releases. It was frustrating when my changes were apparently continually being undone, and my approaches to 66.65.97.10 in order to discuss his views on the page, i.e. 1) to see if there could not be some compromise way forward or 2) another resolution (perhaps even educating me as to where I was in error), where being ignored. The whole "editor war" storm seemed to develop out of nowhere. I admit that, whilst I had no overt intention of getting into that situation, as someone in that friction with another editor, I may have been equally to blame. Even though I knew there is an elected Disputes Team, I did not know who to approach, or how to approach them. I will definitely keep the edit warring policy in mind and I will review the essay that you have suggested, i.e. Wikipedia:Responding to a failure to discuss.

Your response and actions were much appreciated. SMargan (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, you're welcome – and thank you very much for the kind feedback.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

SMargan, re: your edits at List of Dora the Explorer home video releases, you have to be careful not to involve yourself in edit-warring, because you can wind up sanctioned as well. You did the right thing by opening a discussion on the talk page. I notified the IP that they should participate in discussion. If they don't, after a fashion, (I sometimes let these things go for 2 weeks or so) you can try restoring the content. If they remove it again, don't revert, rather take it to the edit-warring noticeboard. Nobody's going to die if the wrong information is in that article for a while. As part of our Bold, Revert, Discuss process, if an editor is stonewalling change by reverting and failing to discuss, that is a behavioural problem, and the editor can be sanctioned for that. Don't get dragged into the drama. Please keep cool. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To Cyphoidbomb,

Thank you again for taking the time to deal with this matter. Apologies again on my part, as it undoubtedly takes two to start a "editor war".

You are right, that I was not sure about the correct procedure. I did not know about the "Email Warring Alert Notice Board" (edit-warring noticeboard). However, now that I do know about it, I will use that if a future such incident arises straightaway. You are correct, that ordinarily 'appropriate time' should have be given for 66.65.97.10 to respond.

I knew that trying to open a dialogue with 66.65.97.10 was the first step. I made several attempts to do this, but 66.65.97.10 seemed completely oblivious. I was not sure whether 66.65.97.10 was just unfamiliar with the technical process of Wiki communicating, or was just being deligerant. I felt that if I could somehow open a dialogue, then a editor conflict could have been averted before it escalated like it did. Indeed, whilst a large amount of 66.65.97.10's action have been regressive and harmful, some edits have been helpful to the page.

As you know, a few days ago 66.65.97.10 was warned about continually undoing content. Back then, as now, I was glad that there was some unsolicited arbitrator intervention, as then I would not have know how to contact the arbiter. At that stage, I gave my position both here and to User talk:ToBeFree, whilst 66.65.97.10 did not take part in that process. A 24-hour ban on editing that page was imposed on 66.65.97.10.

After the 24 hour ban was lifted, 66.65.97.10 seemed to continue unabated. I was not sure how to proceed. I undid 3 edits, which were literally undoing undo edits he had undone many times previous. I thought the comments I was putting with those undo changes might have been the overtures that were needed to encourage 66.65.97.10 to start a discussion. I was a bit reluctant on bringing it to an arbiter board straight away, as I am aware the arbiters must get millions of these type of conflict issues. Indeed, because of the time difference, when 66.65.97.10 did this, it was in the middle of the night here so my immediate responses were limited.

The whole thing is so embarrassing, as the dispute just seems so petty. I was not sure that taking it to an arbiters straight away might not just seem a waste of arbiter time. Indeed, I am still a little bit unsure of what the fresh-hold would be for taking a editor conflict to this forum would be. However, in future, now that I know of the existence of the "Email Warring Alert Notice Board" (edit-warring noticeboard), I will err on the side of caution and take something like this there immediately.

Once again thank you!

SMargan (talk) 07:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In cases like these when we encounter editors who try to take ownership of articles and fail to communicate, they typically wind up blocked rather quickly. Regards, Cyphoidbomb 22:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MINOR

Hey there, re: this, just so you know, the minor edit tickbox is intended for small, cosmetic changes like typo fixes, grammar improvements, reversion of obvious vandalism, spelling improvements, and things of that nature, i.e. things that couldn't possibly be the subject of a dispute. It'd be appreciated if you'd please keep this in mind. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To Cyphoidbomb,

Now that I know that, I will keep that in mind!

I was classifying minor changes as anything that did not majorly structurally change the direction of the page. In hindsight, I have been ticking that "Minor Edit" box a little too frequently. That has meant I have been erroneously including "the addition of references to already existing text", and other similar edits that might be considered major edits, as "minor edits". I will tick the "minor edit" box sparingly in future.

Thanks for the advice yet again.

SMargan (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Also, generally speaking, I don't normally see line divisions like yours between talk page comments. I suppose you're free to do what you want on your own talk page, but you might avoid doing that on other discussion pages. We typically just indent as I've done below. Not admonishing you, just trying to educate you on some of our community norms. I'll go away now.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To Cyphoidbomb,

Thanks for the advise! Keep those pointers coming! I am going through my comments now and removing any "line divisions" that I find.

SMargan (talk) 23:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Dora the Explorer home media releases, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paramount (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To: DPL bot

I am not sure what this error refers to. Can you give me more information? I will keep on reviewing that particular "List of Dora the Explorer home media releases" page and see whether there is anything I can do to remedy the error you have raised.

SMargan (talk) 23:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Bennv3771 found the problem and remedied it before I could. I have publically thanked that editor, and now I also send a big 'thank you' to you (even though you are an automated bot arbiter) for notifying me of this problem, even though I was not personally able to remedy this error in time.

SMargan (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Octonauts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sea pig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To DPL bot,

Thanks for posting this automated "Disambiguation link" notification, thus bringing to my attention an accidental minor error that I created in my prior edit. I have remedied the The Octonauts Wiki Page that you referred to, by fixing the existing inaccurate "Sea Pig" Wiki Link reference, away from the disambiguation pointer to "Sea Pig", which did not exist as a page, to the more accurate page title of "Scotoplanes", via the Wiki Link Sea pig.

SMargan (talk) 07:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AIV entry re Paw Patrol vandal

Hi there, spotted your mention of me at AIV when reporting User:173.66.187.26 - don't worry, I'd already reported them over there :) Just so you know, entries are auto-removed once an admin picks them up and bans the relevant user. Thanks very much for your vigilance, you're helping make Wikipedia a better place! Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 11:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To Naypta,

It was my pleasure! Thank you for being so vigilant, in your spotting of this vandalism. I had no idea that there were such vandals who openly worked to do such destructive edits, even to the point of tagging their own vandalism with credit messages. I had assumed everyone was accessing this Wikipedia medium with altruistic intentions. SMargan (talk) 12:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of The Octonauts DVD Releases has been accepted

List of The Octonauts DVD Releases, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Java Hurricane 11:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Octonauts DVD releases moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of The Octonauts DVD releases, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. We don’t need more links to sites selling the DVDs. We do need more links to independent reviews dis us ding thevDVDs as a whole to demonstrate their WP:NOTABILITY. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of PJ Masks DVD releases (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at PJ Masks. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of PJ Masks DVD releases and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of PJ Masks DVD releases, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ILGA

Hello. I added ILGA to the pedophile advocacy category because they at one time contained the North American Man/Boy Love Association, which is a pro-pedophile organization. I was trying to be objective and not engage in "homophobic vandalism" but I can easily see why some people would be offended by my highlighting the connection between the two organizations. Djodjo666 (talk) 19:21, December 19, 2020 (UTC)

SK2242 (talk) 08:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SMargan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SK2242 (talk) 08:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So many wonderful contributions to the List of LGBT awareness periods page!

I have that page on a watchlist and I saw all the additions you made there and I'm grateful you did that. I don't think we would cross editing paths, even though I edit a good deal of LGBTQ pages (mostly relating to characters and history of characters in animation) based on the stuff you have on your user page, but its good to have passionate people like you on here. Hope you have a good day! --Historyday01 (talk) 19:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To Historyday01, I am glad you like my contributions! Thanks also for reaching out! I am sure there is a large Wikipedia editor's community, but I rarely get feedback from other editors. It is great to hear from other people like yourself, who edit similar pages.

My Wikipedia work has been often focussed on children's animation, as I often look after my sister's kids and watch those show with them. As I visited those pages, a made updates and improvements as I went. I find that these type of children's animation pages are often poorly researched, not generally updated that regularly, and often prone to vandalism, so they keep me busy.

Recently, I had to do some research into "List of LGBT awareness periods", as part of my work with ILGA Oceania (UN NGO for LGBTI people). I am glad someone put a list like the "List of LGBT awareness periods" together. However, I noticed a few improvements that could be made. Therefore, as with my visits to the Children's animation pages, I made updates and improvements, as I went. That is why you probably have not seen me around, as this is not my traditional area of editing. However, I am sure we will see each other around in the future. SMargan (talk) 00:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, its my pleasure. Yeah I don't get feedback on my editing much either. Its true that pages like that are often poorly researched, which is really unfortunate, so that's great you are working on that. I keep expanding my area of interest (somehow I started editing pages about mature animations and then space pirates, ha), but it definitely covers children's animation, at least in some capacity. I'm sure we will see each other around in the future too! In terms of LGBTQ children's animations, I am excited for the final season of Carmen Sandiego as there is a high possibility we may end up with a lesbian romance at the end (if not, the show still has been pretty good), the next season of The Owl House, Port of the Sea (made by the same person who created Nomad of Nowhere) and a bunch of others (S.A.L.E.M.: The Secret Archive of Legends, Enchantments, and Monsters), well and the upcoming Lumberjanes series too. 2020 has been a boon for series like that, with Hilda (British-Canadian series), Recorded by Arizal, Victor and Valentino, Cleopatra in Space the upcoming Villainous. Some other series I love are Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure (I just finished in 2020), Mysticons, and Sherwood (its a British-Canadian series which premiered in 2019 and no one remembers it). Of those, The Owl House, Nomad of Nowhere, the SALEM series, Lumberjanes, Victor and Valentino (as secondary characters), Cleopatra in Space (as one-off characters), Mysticons (lesbian couple), and Nomad of Nowhere all have canon LGBTQ characters, while Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure has hints of lesbian attraction. I just thought I'd share that, so you are aware of this wonderful shows too. Thanks again, so much, for your work on here. Historyday01 (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of PJ Masks DVD releases

Hello, SMargan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of PJ Masks DVD releases".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giuliano Zaccardelli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for John Cornell

On 23 July 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Cornell, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 17:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Dora the Explorer home media releases

added a link pointing to Paramount

List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (W)

added a link pointing to Grand Prix

List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (Z)

added a link pointing to City News

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (O)

added a link pointing to Israeli

List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (S)

added a link pointing to Turkish

List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (W)

added a link pointing to Grand Prix

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red links

In this edit, you described two red links you removed as "broken" and redirected them to other targets. I have no opinion in this case of the appropriateness of the targets you chose, but you should be aware that there is nothing wrong with red links, and that they serve a valuable purpose: see the guideline WP:Red link. --JBL (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To JBL (talk) - Apologies for the confusion! I should have phrased that with greater clarity. What I meant is that I believed that the link that was in red actually correlated to an actual page, and that I was realigning the link so that it no longer appeared red, and linked the word highlighted to a relevant Wikipedia page. The only reason that I would generally remove a red link, without trying to fix it, is if I thought there was not likely to be a Wikipedia ever created for such a specific keyword or thing.

I hope that clarifies things! Thanks for leaving a comment on my page. I appreciate your commitment to Wikipedia editing, and in particular your efforts to liaise with other Wikipedia editors. SMargan (talk) 14:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yash Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AIAI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (S)

added links pointing to Director, Italian, Producer and Iranian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited François Achille Bazaine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ponts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2007 Scream Awards

added a link pointing to Jane Thomas

Scream Awards

added a link pointing to Paramount

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2010 Scream Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pound of Flesh, Drug Dealer and Horror.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Merrimac State High School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Voice and Chris Black.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zach Avery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deadline and News 24.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Varsity College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross country.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (B)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (B), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (H)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (H), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (O)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (O), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ticket to Ride (board game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 396: / Line 396: @@
 ([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 18:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
+== More problems with your first edit to Ticket to Ride (board game) on 18 March ==
+You introduced a number of red error messages.   Please go over your work and make the necessary corrections to ensure they disappear. [[Special:Contributions/31.55.242.67|31.55.242.67]] ([[User talk:31.55.242.67|talk]]) 16:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC)