User talk:Jtrrs0

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message. If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I am watching it. If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the 'watch' tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist.

Archives (Index)

2020 1 2021 1 2022 1 2023 1 2024 1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"

• Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"

• In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record

• Obituary: Vami_IV

• Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday

• WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Jtrrs0! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
3. Paste {{Frs user|Jtrrs0|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Princess Charlotte of Wales (born 2015) on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Photo gallery added to a problematic article

Hi, was there a reason for re-adding this [1]? Thank you, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

No! I'm really sorry, that was a mistake on my part. Thanks for letting me know. Your edits, were quite good actually. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks and cheers. I'm about to drop a COI notice at the user's talk page. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Sounds good! Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sir Charles Trevelyan, 1st Baronet on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Jtrrs0 (talk) 11:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

request for allowing me to remove unnecessary info

I removed an article as it indicated a specific agenda and also because i felt it was not relevant to the section tourism in pakistan the particular wikipedia article is supposed to be only about pakistan tourism not about its political and economic state and also the guardian article author made it clear that she was telling her opinion only yet it was being treated as a fact. There were a lot of conspiracy theories included too. The opinions of people were treated as mere fact this type of bias is not seen in other tourism pages then why only here. The info was useless too like how does tourism distract from the political and economic state never seen anyone being distracted or say the countrys issues dont exist also there were things in the original news article not specifically about the wikipedia article yet they were manipulated to show as if they were about the article. Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for getting in touch. I've had another quick look at the information you want to remove and in my opinion the information is relevant and from a cursory look the sources seem to support it. If you want to discuss it further I would encourage you to go to the article's talk page. Thanks. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Knightknight12345, please see the message I left on your talk page and please don't remove things, even your own comments from my Talk page without discussing it with me first. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

ok thanks but can you remove our conversation from your talk page i promise i will not bother you again Knightknight12345 (talk) 19:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

You weren't bothering me, we just don't agree on something. Can I ask why you want me to remove the conversation from the talk page? My talk archives automatically fairly often and I would prefer to not disturb that process if possible. Jtrrs0 (talk) 22:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)