Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangiahua railway station: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:36, 31 March 2024

Rangiahua railway station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A station that never saw a single passenger. The line it was built for never opened. A cursory before search found zero. This is quite simply not a notable subject and the article never should have been created. Article was previously PRODed and then dePRODed with a rationale of "you have to prove it's not notable" while providing zero evidence otherwise. At best this should be a redirect to Okaihau Branch. According to that article, "The Rangiahua section was essentially complete: the line wound downhill to the settlement and a station yard complete with platform was built, though the station building itself was not erected."

So, we are dealing with a station that wasn't even completed. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and New Zealand. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment what I actually said when deprodding was "If sources to expand this cannot actually be found (rather than just assumed not to exist) then it should be merged or redirected not deleted", based on an PROD rationale that appeared to based only the content of the article. I do not appreciate the misrepresentation. I do not assert that this is notable, just that if it is not it should be redirected not deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 12:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Okaihau Branch; that would appear to be the logical thing to do given that it had been built. Schwede 66 19:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Non-notable, unused station. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Comment''' what I actually said when deprodding was "If sources to expand this cannot actually be found (rather than just assumed not to exist) then it should be merged or redirected not deleted", based on an PROD rationale that appeared to based only the content of the article. I do not appreciate the misrepresentation. I do not assert that this is notable, just that if it is not it should be redirected not deleted. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 12:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 *'''Redirect''' to [[Okaihau Branch]]; that would appear to be the logical thing to do given that it had been built. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color: #000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color: #FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 19:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
+*'''Redirect''' as above. Non-notable, unused station. [[User:ARandomName123|ARandomName123]] ([[User talk:ARandomName123|talk]])<sup><span class="tmp-color" style="color:Green"><small>Ping me!</small></span></sup>  20:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)