User talk:Jtrrs0

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message. If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I am watching it. If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the 'watch' tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist.

Archives (Index)

2020 1 2021 1 2022 1 2023 1 2024 1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Princess Charlotte of Wales (born 2015) on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

request for allowing me to remove unnecessary info

I removed an article as it indicated a specific agenda and also because i felt it was not relevant to the section tourism in pakistan the particular wikipedia article is supposed to be only about pakistan tourism not about its political and economic state and also the guardian article author made it clear that she was telling her opinion only yet it was being treated as a fact. There were a lot of conspiracy theories included too. The opinions of people were treated as mere fact this type of bias is not seen in other tourism pages then why only here. The info was useless too like how does tourism distract from the political and economic state never seen anyone being distracted or say the countrys issues dont exist also there were things in the original news article not specifically about the wikipedia article yet they were manipulated to show as if they were about the article. Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for getting in touch. I've had another quick look at the information you want to remove and in my opinion the information is relevant and from a cursory look the sources seem to support it. If you want to discuss it further I would encourage you to go to the article's talk page. Thanks. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Knightknight12345, please see the message I left on your talk page and please don't remove things, even your own comments from my Talk page without discussing it with me first. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 18:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

ok thanks but can you remove our conversation from your talk page i promise i will not bother you again Knightknight12345 (talk) 19:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

You weren't bothering me, we just don't agree on something. Can I ask why you want me to remove the conversation from the talk page? My talk archives automatically fairly often and I would prefer to not disturb that process if possible. Jtrrs0 (talk) 22:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

so i may not get messages from trolls Knightknight12345 (talk) 18:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I don’t see why you’d get messages from trolls? Jtrrs0 (talk) 20:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

• Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year

• Interview: Interview on Wikimedia Foundation fundraising and finance strategy

• Special report: 19-page PDF accuses Wikipedia of bias against Israel, suggests editors be forced to reveal their real names, and demands a new feature allowing people to view the history of Wikipedia articles

• Op-Ed: Wikipedia in the age of personality-driven knowledge

• Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors

• News and notes: Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter ratified

• In the media: "For me it’s the autism": AARoad editors on the fork more traveled

• Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune

• Humour: Letters from the editors

• Comix: Layout issue

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

My mistakes.

Hello, you told me that my edits made to the Markos Botsaris page have been reverted, due to them not being constructive. I am sure that you must be talking about the fact that I labeled him as an Arbanite, and changed his name to the Albanian way (Marko Boçari). You call my edits unconstructive, but you and many other editors make his page so that he may seem like he was a Greek, but when you look st what he was, it says that he was a Suliote. The first sentence when I opened that page was: "The Souliotes were an Orthodox Christian Albanian tribal community in the area of Souli in Epirus from the 16th century to the beginning of the 19th century, who via their participation in the Greek War of Independence came to identify with the Greek nation.". He was a Suliote, and Suliotes were an Albanian tribal community. Now this is enough evidence that you have made a mistake reverting my edits on the page of Markos Botsaris, I hope you will anwser. Andi Atdhetari (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello. First of all, I have no interest or desire in making it seem that he was a Greek or anything else. Frankly, I don’t care one way or the other. Please don’t assume that other editors are being malicious.

I have reviewed the edits I reverted and read the article’s Talk page and I am convinced I did the right thing in reverting your edits. You should not make changes that are contrary to the consensus in the Talk Page of an article. In my view, the consensus is that the current version of his name is correct. If you really think this is wrong I’d encourage you to try and convince other editors of your point of view with good, reliable sources. Jtrrs0 (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Removal Of My Comment.

Hello.

Whilst I somehwat agree I did not phase it in the nicest way possible my point still stands so may I re add it nicer. Regent001 (talk) 13:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi. If you do please make sure your comments adhere to the policy on being neutral and that they don’t constitute Vandalism Jtrrs0 (talk) 14:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Closure

Hello Jtrrs0, I hope you are doing well. I'm not particularly experienced with rfc closures, that's why I'm reaching out to you. If I'm not mistaken, an editor who opens an rfc is normally capable of closing it as well. As we discussed at the talkpage, an rfc closure might be the best solution at the moment considering that no major dispute arose prior to it, and this discussion could (re-)open old or newer disputes. Piccco (talk) 00:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)