Talk:Bob Shop: Difference between revisions
Bubba hotep (talk | contribs) comment |
AndyHiggins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:One pertinent policy you may not have read up on is [[:WP:COI]]. I think, in the circumstances, you need to read this quite closely. [[User:Bubba hotep|Bubba]] [[User talk:Bubba hotep|hotep]] 15:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC) |
:One pertinent policy you may not have read up on is [[:WP:COI]]. I think, in the circumstances, you need to read this quite closely. [[User:Bubba hotep|Bubba]] [[User talk:Bubba hotep|hotep]] 15:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
Yes. You do have a valid point of course. I just wanted to start the article as I truly do believe it is note worthy (and fits in with other articles already on Wikipedia). I am sure other users will contribute from now on so it will be neutral (I really did try my utmost to start it off as neutral as possible with pure simple facts). I hope this is acceptable. If it is not I will specifically ask neutral people to contribute immediately. |
|||
Revision as of 16:29, 11 April 2007
Citations have been added to the article. These citations are from the Online Publishers Association of South Africa (http://www.opa.co.za), which is a respected national body for the online industry in South Africa).
More citations will be added soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyHiggins (talk • contribs)
- One pertinent policy you may not have read up on is WP:COI. I think, in the circumstances, you need to read this quite closely. Bubba hotep 15:15, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes. You do have a valid point of course. I just wanted to start the article as I truly do believe it is note worthy (and fits in with other articles already on Wikipedia). I am sure other users will contribute from now on so it will be neutral (I really did try my utmost to start it off as neutral as possible with pure simple facts). I hope this is acceptable. If it is not I will specifically ask neutral people to contribute immediately.