Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Woods (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Merge or keep |
Hydrangeans (talk | contribs) Keep |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Delete''' not notable character. [[User:Indagate|Indagate]] ([[User talk:Indagate|talk]]) 13:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' not notable character. [[User:Indagate|Indagate]] ([[User talk:Indagate|talk]]) 13:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge''' to, I guess, [[List of Doctor Who supporting characters]] or '''keep'''. I don't quite agree that ''Gender and the Quest...'' "doesnt seem great either", and we have the short reception section already, so I am on the fence about notability as long as I don't get more input about ''Women in Doctor Who'' or additional sources. In any case, even if this character should ''not'' be notable in it's own right, we still ''have'' this reception section based on secondary sources which should be [[WP:PRESERVE]]d, not lost in deletion. No advantage for the reader whatsoever there. |
*'''Merge''' to, I guess, [[List of Doctor Who supporting characters]] or '''keep'''. I don't quite agree that ''Gender and the Quest...'' "doesnt seem great either", and we have the short reception section already, so I am on the fence about notability as long as I don't get more input about ''Women in Doctor Who'' or additional sources. In any case, even if this character should ''not'' be notable in it's own right, we still ''have'' this reception section based on secondary sources which should be [[WP:PRESERVE]]d, not lost in deletion. No advantage for the reader whatsoever there. |
||
*'''Keep''', based on Daranios finding coverage in two books published by the reputable [[McFarland & Company]] press. There is also [https://www.proquest.com/docview/1709256474?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses coverage of the character in this PhD dissertation]. [[User:Hydrangeans|Hydrangeans]] ([[She (pronoun)|she/her]] | [[User talk:Hydrangeans#top|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Hydrangeans|edits]]) 08:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:28, 29 April 2024
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Courtney Woods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable character, incredibly minor side character who appears as in three episodes. Fails WP:NCHARACTER and GNG Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fictional elements, and Science fiction and fantasy. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Questions Not so sure, there are some sources. Would this publication count as a reliable source? Likewise the character appears in Women in Doctor Who: Damsels, Feminists and Monsters, but I cannot see the extent. Can anyone else? There's also Gender and the Quest in British Science Fiction Television, pp. 186, 206-207, [1] and [2]. Daranios (talk) 09:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- That pdf appears to be a student paper, so I would say no. What Culture is unreliable and that Digital Spy listicle is just a basic plot summary. The second book doesnt seem great either. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 11:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not notable character. Indagate (talk) 13:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to, I guess, List of Doctor Who supporting characters or keep. I don't quite agree that Gender and the Quest... "doesnt seem great either", and we have the short reception section already, so I am on the fence about notability as long as I don't get more input about Women in Doctor Who or additional sources. In any case, even if this character should not be notable in it's own right, we still have this reception section based on secondary sources which should be WP:PRESERVEd, not lost in deletion. No advantage for the reader whatsoever there.
- Keep, based on Daranios finding coverage in two books published by the reputable McFarland & Company press. There is also coverage of the character in this PhD dissertation. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 08:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)