User talk:Richard001: Difference between revisions
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Thanks for doing that. Wikipedia still has way too many claims without references, we should attempt to not add new stuff unless well referenced. Good of you to go to that effort. [[User:MadMaxDog|MadMaxDog]] 10:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
:Thanks for doing that. Wikipedia still has way too many claims without references, we should attempt to not add new stuff unless well referenced. Good of you to go to that effort. [[User:MadMaxDog|MadMaxDog]] 10:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
::On a further note, the link you provided to me needs a password. But I think I can assume that what you say is correct. After all, not all references need to be available online. [[User:MadMaxDog|MadMaxDog]] 10:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Question== |
==Question== |
Revision as of 10:34, 12 April 2007
Geneticist
I saw that you helped edit the geneticist page. I have been working on it for a class and I was wondering if you had any other suggestions or helpful ideas on anything that could be added or changed on the page. Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nichschn (talk • contribs) 17:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC).
I was wondering if you could help me add a picture, I am new to wikipedia and I am not sure how to do this. Thanks for all of your help Nichschn 15:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I completely agree with your comment on the lewis structure article; the majority of the information too, doesn't fit with the text -- in the formal charges section, there are partial charges used in the initial example, which generally make it more confusing for those reading the article for the first time. I'm always wary of those who edit in things such as "consider", "imagine" or "suppose" because it's in a tone which some people can't derive meaning. Minestrone Soup 13:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Pā (Māori)
Can you please provide references for your change? Thank you. MadMaxDog 23:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing that. Wikipedia still has way too many claims without references, we should attempt to not add new stuff unless well referenced. Good of you to go to that effort. MadMaxDog 10:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- On a further note, the link you provided to me needs a password. But I think I can assume that what you say is correct. After all, not all references need to be available online. MadMaxDog 10:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Question
I would like to place the text at User:Badgettrg/death into the Medicine subsection of the death article following causes of death / autopsy. Does this seem appropriate? - Badgettrg 00:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)