Jump to content

The Lazarus Effect (2015 film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
}}
}}


'''''The Lazarus Effect''''' is a 2015 American [[science fantasy]] [[horror film]] directed by [[David Gelb]] and written by [[Luke Dawson]] and [[Jeremy Slater]]. The film stars [[Mark Duplass]], [[Olivia Wilde]], [[Donald Glover]], [[Evan Peters]], and [[Sarah Bolger]]. The film was released on February 27, 2015, by [[Relativity Media]]. It received negative reviews from critics but was a box office success, grossing $38 million worldwide against a budget of $3 million.<ref name="mojo" /><ref name="Cunningham" />
'''''The Lazarus Effect''''' is a 2015 American [[science fantasy]] [[horror film]] directed by [[David Gelb]] and written by [[Luke Dawson]] and [[Jeremy Slater]]. The film stars [[Mark Duplass]], [[Olivia Wilde]], [[Donald Glover]], [[Evan Peters]], and [[Sarah Bolger]]. The film was released on February 27, 2015, by [[Relativity Media]]. It received negative reviews from critics but was a box office success, grossing $38.4 million worldwide against a budget of $3 million.<ref name="mojo" /><ref name="Cunningham" />


==Plot==
==Plot==
Line 77: Line 77:


==Reception==
==Reception==
''The Lazarus Effect'' received generally negative reviews from critics. On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], 15% of 110 reviews were positive, with an [[Weighted arithmetic mean|average rating]] of 4/10. The site's consensus reads "''The Lazarus Effect'' has a talented cast and the glimmer of an interesting idea, but wastes it all on insipid characters and dull, recycled plot points."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/the_lazarus_effect/ |title=The Lazarus Effect |publisher=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=October 29, 2022}}</ref> On [[Metacritic]], the film has a [[Weighted arithmetic mean|weighted average]] score of 31 out of 100, based on 29 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://metacritic.com/movie/the-lazarus-effect|title=The Lazarus Effect Reviews|work=[[Metacritic]]|publisher=[[CBS Interactive]]|access-date=March 5, 2015}}</ref> Audiences polled by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film a grade of "C−" on an A+ to F scale.<ref>{{cite web |last1=D'Alessandro |first1=Anthony |title=Will Smith’s ‘Focus’ Lower In Actuals With $18.69M Opening – Box Office Update |url=https://deadline.com/2015/03/will-smith-focus-weekend-box-office-opening-lazarus-effect-1201383452/ |website=Deadline Hollywood |date=2 March 2015 |quote=Lazarus Effect got a C- CinemaScore }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=McClintock |first1=Pamela |title=Box Office: Will Smith’s ‘Focus’ Opens to Muted $19.1M But Still No. 1 |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/box-office-will-smiths-focus-778282/ |website=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |date=27 February 2015 |quote=It received a C- CinemaScore, not unusual for a horror title.}}</ref><ref name="mojo0301" />
''The Lazarus Effect'' received generally negative reviews from critics. On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], 15% of 109 reviews were positive, with an [[Weighted arithmetic mean|average rating]] of 4/10. The site's consensus reads "''The Lazarus Effect'' has a talented cast and the glimmer of an interesting idea, but wastes it all on insipid characters and dull, recycled plot points."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rottentomatoes.com/m/the_lazarus_effect/ |title=The Lazarus Effect |publisher=Rotten Tomatoes |access-date=October 29, 2022}}</ref> On [[Metacritic]], the film has a [[Weighted arithmetic mean|weighted average]] score of 31 out of 100, based on 29 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://metacritic.com/movie/the-lazarus-effect|title=The Lazarus Effect Reviews|work=[[Metacritic]]|publisher=[[CBS Interactive]]|access-date=March 5, 2015}}</ref> Audiences polled by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film a grade of "C−" on an A+ to F scale.<ref>{{cite web |last1=D'Alessandro |first1=Anthony |title=Will Smith’s ‘Focus’ Lower In Actuals With $18.69M Opening – Box Office Update |url=https://deadline.com/2015/03/will-smith-focus-weekend-box-office-opening-lazarus-effect-1201383452/ |website=Deadline Hollywood |date=2 March 2015 |quote=Lazarus Effect got a C- CinemaScore }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=McClintock |first1=Pamela |title=Box Office: Will Smith’s ‘Focus’ Opens to Muted $19.1M But Still No. 1 |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/box-office-will-smiths-focus-778282/ |website=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |date=27 February 2015 |quote=It received a C- CinemaScore, not unusual for a horror title.}}</ref><ref name="mojo0301" />


Frank Scheck of ''[[The Hollywood Reporter]]'' gave the film a negative review, saying "The film squanders whatever potential it had, not to mention the talents of such performers as Duplass and Wilde who clearly deserve better."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://hollywoodreporter.com/movie/lazarus-0/review/777986 |title='The Lazarus Effect': Film Review |work=The Hollywood Reporter |date=2015-02-26 |access-date=2015-04-26 |first=Frank |last=Scheck}}</ref> James Rocchi of ''[[The Wrap]]'' gave the film four out of five stars, saying "''The Lazarus Effect'' doesn't exactly break new ground, but it nonetheless finds plenty to relish in the mouldering bits it stitches together as it gives classic themes about death, life and the soul a literal and figurative shot in the arm."<ref>{{cite web|author=James Rocchi|url=https://thewrap.com/the-lazarus-effect-review-olivia-wilde-mark-duplass-donald-glover/ |title='The Lazarus Effect' Review: Olivia Wilde, Mark Duplass Learn That Sometimes, Dead is Better |publisher=TheWrap |date=2015-02-25 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref> Geoff Berkshire of ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' gave the film a negative review, saying "Mark Duplass and Olivia Wilde struggle to breathe life into a recycled thriller about the horrors of reanimation."<ref>{{cite news|author=Geoff Berkshire |url=https://variety.com/2015/film/reviews/film-review-the-lazarus-effect-1201441663/ |title='The Lazarus Effect' Review: It Lives (But Barely) |publisher=Variety |date=2015-02-26 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref> Mick LaSalle of the ''[[San Francisco Chronicle]]'' gave the film one out of four stars, saying "This is an 83-minute movie that feels a half hour longer and, if it weren't for the loud crescendos, it would put people to sleep."<ref>{{cite news|author=Mick LaSalle |url=http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/Lazarus-Effect-revives-corpses-but-puts-6103378.php |title=Review: 'Lazarus Effect' revives dead, but puts audiences out |publisher=SFGate |date=2015-02-26 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref> Claudia Puig of ''[[USA Today]]'' gave the film two and a half stars out of four, saying "Absorbing, well-crafted and appropriately tense, with a smart cast that raises it a notch above average."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2015/02/26/lazarus-effect-review/24032785/ |title='Lazarus' rises above the horror pack |publisher=Usatoday.com |date=2015-02-27 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref> Peter Keough of ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' gave the film a negative review, saying "There are lessons to be learned from this minimalist thriller. The first is that scaring people requires more than just tossing furniture around, turning the lights off and on, and basically sneaking up from behind and shouting "Boo!"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/movies/2015/02/26/lazarus-effect-cannot-raised-from-dead/cj5RliqHWj0DKhzX0zN9LJ/story.html |title='Lazarus Effect' cannot be raised from the dead - Movies |publisher=The Boston Globe |date=2015-02-26 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref>
Frank Scheck of ''[[The Hollywood Reporter]]'' gave the film a negative review, saying "The film squanders whatever potential it had, not to mention the talents of such performers as Duplass and Wilde who clearly deserve better."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://hollywoodreporter.com/movie/lazarus-0/review/777986 |title='The Lazarus Effect': Film Review |work=The Hollywood Reporter |date=2015-02-26 |access-date=2015-04-26 |first=Frank |last=Scheck}}</ref> James Rocchi of ''[[The Wrap]]'' gave the film four out of five stars, saying "''The Lazarus Effect'' doesn't exactly break new ground, but it nonetheless finds plenty to relish in the mouldering bits it stitches together as it gives classic themes about death, life and the soul a literal and figurative shot in the arm."<ref>{{cite web|author=James Rocchi|url=https://thewrap.com/the-lazarus-effect-review-olivia-wilde-mark-duplass-donald-glover/ |title='The Lazarus Effect' Review: Olivia Wilde, Mark Duplass Learn That Sometimes, Dead is Better |publisher=TheWrap |date=2015-02-25 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref> Geoff Berkshire of ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' gave the film a negative review, saying "Mark Duplass and Olivia Wilde struggle to breathe life into a recycled thriller about the horrors of reanimation."<ref>{{cite news|author=Geoff Berkshire |url=https://variety.com/2015/film/reviews/film-review-the-lazarus-effect-1201441663/ |title='The Lazarus Effect' Review: It Lives (But Barely) |publisher=Variety |date=2015-02-26 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref> Mick LaSalle of the ''[[San Francisco Chronicle]]'' gave the film one out of four stars, saying "This is an 83-minute movie that feels a half hour longer and, if it weren't for the loud crescendos, it would put people to sleep."<ref>{{cite news|author=Mick LaSalle |url=http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/Lazarus-Effect-revives-corpses-but-puts-6103378.php |title=Review: 'Lazarus Effect' revives dead, but puts audiences out |publisher=SFGate |date=2015-02-26 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref> Claudia Puig of ''[[USA Today]]'' gave the film two and a half stars out of four, saying "Absorbing, well-crafted and appropriately tense, with a smart cast that raises it a notch above average."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2015/02/26/lazarus-effect-review/24032785/ |title='Lazarus' rises above the horror pack |publisher=Usatoday.com |date=2015-02-27 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref> Peter Keough of ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' gave the film a negative review, saying "There are lessons to be learned from this minimalist thriller. The first is that scaring people requires more than just tossing furniture around, turning the lights off and on, and basically sneaking up from behind and shouting "Boo!"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/movies/2015/02/26/lazarus-effect-cannot-raised-from-dead/cj5RliqHWj0DKhzX0zN9LJ/story.html |title='Lazarus Effect' cannot be raised from the dead - Movies |publisher=The Boston Globe |date=2015-02-26 |access-date=2015-04-26}}</ref>

Revision as of 09:07, 5 May 2024

The Lazarus Effect
The right side of a woman's face with fully black eyeballs with scarring all around that same eye. The words "The Lazarus Effect" are at the bottom right in white, 5 cast member names above the title, and the tagline "Evil Will Rise" at the bottom middle.
Theatrical release poster
Directed byDavid Gelb
Written by
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyMichael Fimognari
Edited byMichael N. Knue
Music bySarah Schachner
Production
companies
Distributed by
Release date
  • February 27, 2015 (2015-02-27)
Running time
83 minutes[2]
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$3.3 million[3][4]
Box office$38.4 million[4]

The Lazarus Effect is a 2015 American science fantasy horror film directed by David Gelb and written by Luke Dawson and Jeremy Slater. The film stars Mark Duplass, Olivia Wilde, Donald Glover, Evan Peters, and Sarah Bolger. The film was released on February 27, 2015, by Relativity Media. It received negative reviews from critics but was a box office success, grossing $38.4 million worldwide against a budget of $3 million.[4][3]

Plot

At a university, medical researchers Dr. Frank Walton and his fiancée, Dr. Zoe McConnell, developed a serum, code-named "Lazarus". Although intended to assist coma patients, the serum can bring the dead back to life. Videography student Eva documents their project.

Assisted by their colleagues Niko and Clay, they run a successful trial on a recently euthanized dog, Rocky. However, the revived Rocky displays several unusual psychological and physical phenomena: cataracts formerly present in his eyes abruptly dissolve, he loses his appetite, and he displays increased aggression. Tests reveal that the serum, instead of dissipating, is concentrated within Rocky's brain and causes new synapses to be constructed.

The university dean learns of their underground experiments and shuts down their project. In addition, a major pharmaceutical company has bought out the company that funded their research and confiscated everything associated with the project.

Desperate to prove their ownership of the serum formula, Frank and his team sneak into their lab to replicate the experiment. During their attempt, Zoe is fatally electrocuted. Despite the others' warnings, a distraught Frank uses the serum on her. Initially, the revival is a success, but the team soon realizes that something is wrong with Zoe. She claims that when she died, she went to her version of Hell, which was a nightmare originating from her childhood: during a fire in her apartment building, she witnessed trapped neighbors burning to death. She also demonstrates unusual psychic abilities.

They realize that the serum causes brains to "evolve" rapidly, giving Zoe superhuman abilities such as telekinesis and telepathy. It also causes increased aggression and insanity. Zoe eventually finds Eva and shows her the nightmarish Hell she experienced. It is revealed that Zoe was the one causing the fire in the building, and she went to Hell when she died. Zoe kills Rocky and then attempts to seduce Niko. When he refuses, she telekinetically throws him into a locker and crushes it, killing him. Zoe cuts the power to the entire lab. When Clay demands to know where Niko is, she kills him by lodging an e-cigarette into his throat. Later, Zoe kills Frank after he attempts to inject her with poison. Zoe then injects herself with an entire bag of the serum, strengthening her abilities.

Eva, who is still alive and trying to locate Zoe to inject her, is left in the dark. Zoe eventually finds Eva, who is apparently able to escape and inject Zoe with the syringe, but it turns out to be an illusion; Zoe then kills Eva. Zoe then injects Frank with her own serum-saturated blood, successfully bringing him back from the dead.

Cast

Release

On December 17, 2013, it was announced that the film (then titled Lazarus) would be released on January 30, 2015, with Lionsgate distributing the film.[5] On November 4, 2014, Relativity Media acquired U.S. distribution rights to the film from Lionsgate, which retained international distribution and sales rights, and set the film's release date for February 20, 2015.[1] In December 2014, it was then announced that the film would be retitled The Lazarus Effect, and be released a week later than previously planned, on February 27, 2015.[6]

Marketing

The first still of the film was released on January 5, 2015, along with the theatrical poster.[7]

Box office

In North America, the film opened to number five in its first weekend, with $10,203,437, behind Focus, Kingsman: The Secret Service, The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water, and Fifty Shades of Grey.[8][9]

Reception

The Lazarus Effect received generally negative reviews from critics. On Rotten Tomatoes, 15% of 109 reviews were positive, with an average rating of 4/10. The site's consensus reads "The Lazarus Effect has a talented cast and the glimmer of an interesting idea, but wastes it all on insipid characters and dull, recycled plot points."[10] On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 31 out of 100, based on 29 critics, indicating "generally unfavorable reviews".[11] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film a grade of "C−" on an A+ to F scale.[12][13][9]

Frank Scheck of The Hollywood Reporter gave the film a negative review, saying "The film squanders whatever potential it had, not to mention the talents of such performers as Duplass and Wilde who clearly deserve better."[14] James Rocchi of The Wrap gave the film four out of five stars, saying "The Lazarus Effect doesn't exactly break new ground, but it nonetheless finds plenty to relish in the mouldering bits it stitches together as it gives classic themes about death, life and the soul a literal and figurative shot in the arm."[15] Geoff Berkshire of Variety gave the film a negative review, saying "Mark Duplass and Olivia Wilde struggle to breathe life into a recycled thriller about the horrors of reanimation."[16] Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle gave the film one out of four stars, saying "This is an 83-minute movie that feels a half hour longer and, if it weren't for the loud crescendos, it would put people to sleep."[17] Claudia Puig of USA Today gave the film two and a half stars out of four, saying "Absorbing, well-crafted and appropriately tense, with a smart cast that raises it a notch above average."[18] Peter Keough of The Boston Globe gave the film a negative review, saying "There are lessons to be learned from this minimalist thriller. The first is that scaring people requires more than just tossing furniture around, turning the lights off and on, and basically sneaking up from behind and shouting "Boo!"[19]

A.A. Dowd of The A.V. Club gave the film a C−, saying "Like too many horror films, this one seems targeted at a hypothetical audience using only 10 percent of its brainpower."[20] Joe Neumaier of the New York Daily News gave the film two out of five stars, saying "The Lazarus Effect, clocking in at a brief 86 minutes, doesn’t go far enough, isn’t scary enough and has mad scientists who just aren’t mad enough. You watch it hoping it revives itself, but that dream is dead and buried."[21] Michael O'Sullivan of The Washington Post gave the film one out of four stars, saying "It staggers, zombielike, from one jump-scare to another before petering out, a scant 83 minutes after rising from the slab."[22] Bruce Demara of the Toronto Star gave the film two out of four stars, saying "While The Lazarus Effect isn't the worst scary movie film you'll see this year, it is probably one of the most predictable and lazily plotted."[23] James Berardinelli of ReelViews gave the film two out of four stars, saying "The Lazarus Effect begins with an intriguing premise then proceeds to squander all the early goodwill through a slow, inexorable descent into cheap horror gimmicks."[24] Kevin C. Johnson of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch gave the film two out of four stars, saying "The Lazarus Effect boasts nothing special. It's not going to provide much relief for horror-starved audiences."[25] Keith Staskiewicz of Entertainment Weekly gave the film a C−, saying "I would have loved to see more from the filmmakers, daring to fail while staking out some new terror incognita instead of just going through the motions of an experiment for which we already have the results."[26]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Blumhouse's 'Lazarus' Gets February Release Date With Relativity Buy - Deadline". Deadline. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  2. ^ "AMC Theatres: The Lazarus Effect". amctheatres.com. Retrieved February 25, 2015.
  3. ^ a b Todd Cunningham. "'Lazarus Effect' to Test Jason Blum Effect of Turning Low-Budget Thrillers Into Box-Office Hits". Thewrap.com. Retrieved February 28, 2015.
  4. ^ a b c "The Lazarus Effect (2015)". Box Office Mojo. February 3, 2015. Retrieved May 11, 2015.
  5. ^ McNary, Dave (December 18, 2013). "Lionsgate Dates Olivia Wilde's 'Lazarus' for 2015 Super Bowl Weekend". Variety. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  6. ^ "David Gelb's Lazarus with Olivia Wilde, Mark Duplass & Evan Peters Retitled 'The Lazarus Effect', Release Date Pushed to February 27th". Final Reel. Retrieved December 12, 2014.
  7. ^ Kenji Lloyd (January 5, 2015). "First Poster & First Look at Olivia Wilde in The Lazarus Effect, Jason Blum Hopeful for a Sequel". finalreel.co.uk. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
  8. ^ "Weekend Box Office Results for February 27-March 1, 2015". Box Office Mojo. March 1, 2015. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  9. ^ a b Ray Subers (March 1, 2015). "Weekend Report: 'Focus' Pulls Off Minor Heist at the Box Office". Box Office Mojo. They awarded the movie a "C-" CinemaScore, which is pretty standard for this genre.
  10. ^ "The Lazarus Effect". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved October 29, 2022.
  11. ^ "The Lazarus Effect Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved March 5, 2015.
  12. ^ D'Alessandro, Anthony (March 2, 2015). "Will Smith's 'Focus' Lower In Actuals With $18.69M Opening – Box Office Update". Deadline Hollywood. Lazarus Effect got a C- CinemaScore
  13. ^ McClintock, Pamela (February 27, 2015). "Box Office: Will Smith's 'Focus' Opens to Muted $19.1M But Still No. 1". The Hollywood Reporter. It received a C- CinemaScore, not unusual for a horror title.
  14. ^ Scheck, Frank (February 26, 2015). "'The Lazarus Effect': Film Review". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  15. ^ James Rocchi (February 25, 2015). "'The Lazarus Effect' Review: Olivia Wilde, Mark Duplass Learn That Sometimes, Dead is Better". TheWrap. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  16. ^ Geoff Berkshire (February 26, 2015). "'The Lazarus Effect' Review: It Lives (But Barely)". Variety. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  17. ^ Mick LaSalle (February 26, 2015). "Review: 'Lazarus Effect' revives dead, but puts audiences out". SFGate. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  18. ^ "'Lazarus' rises above the horror pack". Usatoday.com. February 27, 2015. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  19. ^ "'Lazarus Effect' cannot be raised from the dead - Movies". The Boston Globe. February 26, 2015. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  20. ^ A.A. Dowd (February 26, 2015). "Review: You won't need 100 percent of your brain to dismiss The Lazarus Effect". Avclub.com. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  21. ^ "'The Lazarus Effect" review: Dead on arrival". New York: NY Daily News. February 26, 2015. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  22. ^ O'Sullivan, Michael (February 26, 2015). "'The Lazarus Effect' fails to reanimate tired monster movie cliches". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  23. ^ "The Lazarus Effect contains an old plot best left buried: review | Toronto Star". Thestar.com. February 26, 2015. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  24. ^ James Berardinelli (February 26, 2015). "Lazarus Effect, The | Reelviews Movie Reviews". Reelviews.net. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  25. ^ "Harmless 'The Lazarus Effect' mostly flatlines : Entertainment". Stltoday.com. February 27, 2015. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
  26. ^ Staskiewicz, Keith (February 27, 2015). "'The Lazarus Effect': EW review". EW.com. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_Lazarus_Effect_(2015_film)&oldid=1222320116"