Talk:History of LSD: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:02, 7 May 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of LSD article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 years

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Altered States of Consciousness Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of altered states of consciousness on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Altered States of ConsciousnessWikipedia:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessTemplate:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessAltered States of Consciousness
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Drug Policy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs

Bicycle Day

I removed the subsection titled "Bicycle day" as it was highly tangential. There is already an appropriate reference to "Bicycle Day" in the section titled "Discovery and history". TR166ER (talk) 15:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Roberts should be cited as he coined this phrase Turkeyphan^t 02:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

last paragraph claims ingestion was on the 16th - which conflicts with first paragraph which states original event was on 19th § — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:8A9:6700:4A1:EA70:CD8:C3DA (talk) 09:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"inventing a word"? Rhetorically, Is it patented, copyrighted?

More erudition. Perhaps "coined" 98.144.238.191 (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not "promoting" an idea. It is "promulgating".

Lack of erudition is appalling. 98.144.238.191 (talk) 14:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Opening image

Change from blotter paper to an image of bottle of Rx Delysid. This is "History" Of LSD reddit. 98.144.238.191 (talk) 14:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Research in Czechoslovakia

I contributed a paragraph on the use in Czechoslovakia, but it got deleted completely. I believe it is very relevant because it was one of the few countries that produced it's own LSD and the research done for military, medical and experimental purposes was quite extensive and is well documented, for which I provided 4 different sources from reliable media, and certainly more could be found in literature I don't currently have access to. This was argued by User:WikiLinuz who deleted the text to not in fact be reliable sources, but I disagree with that judgement. Furthermore, I also disagree with the judgement of it being WP:UNDUE as I think it's comparable in significance and extent to e.g. the mkultra research and my text had comparable volume and I consider the judgement of it being undue to be an instance of Americentrism. My paragraph was free of opinion claims, it only provided a summary of events. I would thus like it to return the text in some form. Please tell me in more detail how it should be modified so that it's more acceptable. Barvinek (talk) 10:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The MIT press source the only reliable source on your addition. I'm not against adding the material about Czechoslovakia, but it should be properly sourced. The MIT source is mainly about LSD's application in psychedelic therapy (which I have no problem with), but significant amount of the content you added is about military usage (which the MIT source doesn't talk about). So you should add reliable sources particularly regarding LSD experimentation in the military (and by the communists). --WikiLinuz (talk) 11:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, do I understand it correctly, if I provide sources that you would consider more reliable, you would find the text itself acceptable? Or do you also see other issues with it? Barvinek (talk) 12:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 [[User:Barvinek|Barvinek]] ([[User talk:Barvinek|talk]]) 10:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 :The [https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/an-untold-story-of-lsd-psychotherapy-in-communist-czechoslovakia/ MIT press] source the only reliable source on your addition. I'm not against adding the material about Czechoslovakia, but it should be properly sourced. The MIT source is mainly about LSD's application in [[psychedelic therapy]] (which I have no problem with), but significant amount of the content you added is about military usage (which the MIT source doesn't talk about). So you should add reliable sources particularly regarding LSD experimentation in the military (and by the communists). --[[User:WikiLinuz|<span style="font-family:Optima;color:#292928;">'''Wiki'''<span style="color:red;">'''''Linuz'''''</span></span>]] ([[User_talk:WikiLinuz|<span style="font-family:Optima;">talk</span>]]) 11:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
-::So, do I understand it correctly, if I provide sources that you would consider more reliable, you would find the text itself acceptable. Or do you see other issues with it? [[User:Barvinek|Barvinek]] ([[User talk:Barvinek|talk]]) 12:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
+::So, do I understand it correctly, if I provide sources that you would consider more reliable, you would find the text itself acceptable? Or do you also see other issues with it? [[User:Barvinek|Barvinek]] ([[User talk:Barvinek|talk]]) 12:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)