User talk:Jtrrs0: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jtrrs0/Archives/2024 1. (BOT) |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:::::ps. will I have to make a request in the talk page. Will other editors immediately respond to me? [[User:Knightknight12345|Knightknight12345]] ([[User talk:Knightknight12345|talk]]) 17:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
:::::ps. will I have to make a request in the talk page. Will other editors immediately respond to me? [[User:Knightknight12345|Knightknight12345]] ([[User talk:Knightknight12345|talk]]) 17:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::::I do think you should make a request there. It is how we deal with disputed material. People often put pages they are interested in on their watchlist and so editors who are interested will be notified. It is unlikely that they will respond immediately but it should not take too long to get some responses. [[User:Jtrrs0|Jtrrs0]] ([[User talk:Jtrrs0#top|talk]]) 19:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
::::::I do think you should make a request there. It is how we deal with disputed material. People often put pages they are interested in on their watchlist and so editors who are interested will be notified. It is unlikely that they will respond immediately but it should not take too long to get some responses. [[User:Jtrrs0|Jtrrs0]] ([[User talk:Jtrrs0#top|talk]]) 19:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::::Thanks for the help [[User:Knightknight12345|Knightknight12345]] ([[User talk:Knightknight12345|talk]]) 11:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:29, 10 May 2024
| Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message.
If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I am watching it. If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the 'watch' tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist. |
 | Jtrrs0 uses the Wikibreak Switch template, and plans to update this notice if a wikibreak is taken. |
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 | Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him! |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Israel–Hamas war on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Djong (ship) has an RfC
Djong (ship) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Talk:Djong (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment-- your comment would be greatly appreciated Merzostin (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics, and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
Request to allow me to remove a section that is not neutral from an article
Hi. A couple of months ago you left a message on my talk page in which you reverted the changes I made to an article. I made the changes because I thought that the particular section was not neutral. Furthermore the news article it linked to was an opinion piece. The article is very long and needs a cleanup. Therefore I think the section should be removed. It is unnecessary and not neutral. Furthermore it doesn't fit with the articles tone. So kindly allow me to remove it. Thanks Knightknight12345 (talk) 14:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for getting in touch. If you mean the edits you made to Tourism in Pakistan then please discuss them in the Article's Talk page so other interested users can contribute. As far as I can remember the article you wanted to remove seemed relevant to me, but please discuss it on the Talk page. It would be helpful if you could explain why you think it is biased. I don't think it's an opinion piece. It's a Long Read which just means it's a longer investigative piece. Jtrrs0 (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- About the article,think it's not neutral and too sensationalist. Actually, the whole section is. It is too off the tone. It all seems a little extra. Plus the page needs a cleanup and it is too long. What if I remove the whole section(image and influencers). Would it break rules. I am experienced editor now. I have contributed to many articles.Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- When I read it back then the section and the article seemed fine to me. If you disagree, I would prefer if you discussed it in the Article's Talk Page because there may be other editors who are interested and experienced there. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for your time Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- ps. will I have to make a request in the talk page. Will other editors immediately respond to me? Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do think you should make a request there. It is how we deal with disputed material. People often put pages they are interested in on their watchlist and so editors who are interested will be notified. It is unlikely that they will respond immediately but it should not take too long to get some responses. Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help Knightknight12345 (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do think you should make a request there. It is how we deal with disputed material. People often put pages they are interested in on their watchlist and so editors who are interested will be notified. It is unlikely that they will respond immediately but it should not take too long to get some responses. Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- ps. will I have to make a request in the talk page. Will other editors immediately respond to me? Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for your time Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- When I read it back then the section and the article seemed fine to me. If you disagree, I would prefer if you discussed it in the Article's Talk Page because there may be other editors who are interested and experienced there. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- About the article,think it's not neutral and too sensationalist. Actually, the whole section is. It is too off the tone. It all seems a little extra. Plus the page needs a cleanup and it is too long. What if I remove the whole section(image and influencers). Would it break rules. I am experienced editor now. I have contributed to many articles.Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)