Talk:Table-oriented programming: Difference between revisions
Girth Summit (talk | contribs) →Hoax?: new section |
→This page should not be speedy deleted because...: new section |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{u|Uncle G}} - a blast from the past. You looked into this in the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Table-oriented programming|deletion discussion in 2006]]. I just declined a G4 speedy on this because it's substantially different from the deleted version, but if this subject isn't a thing... [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span> <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 11:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC) |
{{u|Uncle G}} - a blast from the past. You looked into this in the [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Table-oriented programming|deletion discussion in 2006]]. I just declined a G4 speedy on this because it's substantially different from the deleted version, but if this subject isn't a thing... [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span> <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 11:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
== This page should not be speedy deleted because... == |
|||
This page should not be speedily deleted because ... I was wondering if deletion would be reconsidered in light of the historical section (which I doubt was present on the previous edition, though I'm happy to be proved wrong); I was hoping that the historical section would indicate greater notability than previously assumed. I'd be happy with a "rename" (or even merge) consensus, but thought that, whether the name is right or not, at least the page content should be retained. Thanks! --[[User:TimNelson|TimNelson]] ([[User talk:TimNelson|talk]]) 22:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:52, 12 May 2024
 | This article was nominated for deletion on August 21, 2006. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Hoax?
Uncle G - a blast from the past. You looked into this in the deletion discussion in 2006. I just declined a G4 speedy on this because it's substantially different from the deleted version, but if this subject isn't a thing... Girth Summit (blether) 11:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because ... I was wondering if deletion would be reconsidered in light of the historical section (which I doubt was present on the previous edition, though I'm happy to be proved wrong); I was hoping that the historical section would indicate greater notability than previously assumed. I'd be happy with a "rename" (or even merge) consensus, but thought that, whether the name is right or not, at least the page content should be retained. Thanks! --TimNelson (talk) 22:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)