Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JOM Charity Award: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:59, 18 May 2024

JOM Charity Award

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, non notable Award. Sources number 2 and 3 are same PR puffery published within a month of each other and the contents bear striking similarity and that cannot be taken as a coincidence. Source number 4 from The Sun (Nigeria) is a press release from the JOM Award itself but masked as a news story. Source number 5 from Vanguard (Nigeria) is very similar to sources number 2 and 3 in headlines and in the body and tone of the writing. The headline of the source number 5 says the JOM Award is one of the top 5 charity organisations in the UK but no single UK media outlet is cited in the article – a PR puffery at its best. All other sources cited are similar and unreliable due to their PR puffery LocomotiveEngine (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards, Organizations, and Nigeria. LocomotiveEngine (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jom Charity: Best option for WP:ATD. There are some sources that aren't PR. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- It has enough sources to meet notability for stand alone article.[1],[2],[3],

[4], [5], [6], [7]. Calyx2s (talk) 04:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, nothing has changed since the nomination and what you presented are sources that were in the article when it was nominated. Notability is NOT about the number of sources in an article but their reliability. The sources are PR advertorial puffery. They do not count for notability. LocomotiveEngine (talk) 13:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Nigerian Tribune, Vanguard, Daily Times Nigeria are all reliable and reputed newspapers of Nigeria. If we ignore a couple of references that reported based on the press releases, the article seems to have WP: SigCov. I go for Keep and develop!
Comment, your statement is not based on policy issues raised in this AFD because you have not pointed out a single source that informed your decision on this. It is very clear that the issue is about the PR articles not the news platforms where they are published. Please, take a moment to study what RS is all about before commenting in AFD as it is not about number of votes but the merit of policy arguments.LocomotiveEngine (talk) 12:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Just as Safari Scribe and Davidindia mentioned there are some sources that are not PR . The above sources meet Notability except the one from PM News I feel might be PR.Wasilatlovekesy (talk) 14:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *'''Keep''' The Nigerian Tribune, Vanguard, Daily Times Nigeria are all reliable and reputed newspapers of Nigeria. If we ignore a couple of references that reported based on the press releases, the article seems to have WP: SigCov. I go for Keep and develop!
 *:'''Comment''', your statement is not based on policy issues raised in this AFD because you have not pointed out a single source that informed your decision on this. It is very clear that the issue is about the PR articles not the news platforms where they are published. Please, take a moment to study what RS is all about before commenting in AFD as it is not about number of votes but the merit of policy arguments.[[User:LocomotiveEngine|LocomotiveEngine]] ([[User talk:LocomotiveEngine|talk]]) 12:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' - Just as Safari Scribe and Davidindia mentioned there are some ''sources'' that are not PR . The above sources meet Notability except the one from PM News I feel might be PR.[[User:Wasilatlovekesy|Wasilatlovekesy]] ([[User talk:Wasilatlovekesy|talk]]) 14:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)