Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:Great! That’s a pass. <span style="text-shadow:#000000 0px 1px 2px;">[[User:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">'''48JCL'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">contribs</span>]])</span> 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC) |
:Great! That’s a pass. <span style="text-shadow:#000000 0px 1px 2px;">[[User:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">'''48JCL'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/48JCL|<span style="color:#000000">contribs</span>]])</span> 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
* b (citations to reliable sources): |
* b (citations to reliable sources): {{icon|ga}} sources are reliable! Gov websites are working. |
||
* c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): |
* c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): |
||
It is broad in its coverage. |
It is broad in its coverage. |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Overall: {{icon|NRY}} |
Overall: {{icon|NRY}} |
||
Pass/Fail: {{icon|NRY}} |
Pass/Fail: {{icon|NRY}} |
||
===Source Check=== |
|||
Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing! |
|||
Revision as of 17:00, 18 May 2024
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am excited to review this article.
It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
- Fixed. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Great! That’s a pass. 48JCL (talk • contribs) 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- b (citations to reliable sources): sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
- c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy. Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.: Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
Overall: 
Pass/Fail:
Source Check
Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!