Jump to content

Selca dialect: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: template type. Add: issue, journal. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BorgQueen | Category:Language articles without speaker estimate | #UCB_Category 208/526
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
| fam5 = [[Western South Slavic]]
| fam5 = [[Western South Slavic]]
| fam7 = [[Upper Carniolan dialect group]]
| fam7 = [[Upper Carniolan dialect group]]
| ancestor3 = Upper Carniolan dialect plane
| ancestor2 = Southern Slovene dialect
| ancestor = Southeastern Slovene dialect
| fam6 = [[Slovene language|Slovene]]
| fam6 = [[Slovene language|Slovene]]
| fam4 = [[South Slavic languages|South Slavic]]
| fam4 = [[South Slavic languages|South Slavic]]
Line 21: Line 18:
| dia2 = Eastern (tonal) microdialects
| dia2 = Eastern (tonal) microdialects
}}
}}
{{South Slavic languages sidebar}}


This article uses [[Slovene national phonetic transcription#Logar and Ramovš transcription|Logar transcription]].
This article uses [[Slovene national phonetic transcription#Logar and Ramovš transcription|Logar transcription]].

Revision as of 06:53, 19 May 2024

Selca dialect
Native toSlovenia
RegionSelca Valley, Upper Carniola
EthnicitySlovenes
Dialects
  • Western (non-tonal) microdialects
  • Eastern (tonal) microdialects
Language codes
ISO 639-3
     Selca dialect

This article uses Logar transcription.

The Selca dialect (Template:Lang-sl [séːwʃkɔ naˈɾéːt͡ʃjɛ],[1] Template:Lang-sl[2]) is a Slovene dialect very close to the Upper Carniolan dialect, but showing some features of the Rovte dialect group. It is characterized by extensive syncope, monopthongization of diphthongs, and shortening of long close vowels. It is spoken in the Selca Valley in the Upper Carniola region. It borders the Upper Carniolan dialect to the north and northeast, the Škofja Loka dialect to the southeast, the Poljane dialect to the south, the Cerkno dialect to the southwest, and the Bača subdialect of the Tolmin dialect to the west.[3] The dialect can be split further to the western, non-tonal dialects and eastern, tonal dialects. The dialect belongs to the Upper Carniolan dialect group, and it evolved from the Upper Carniolan dialect base.[3][4]

Geographical distribution

The dialect extends across a small area between the Upper Carniolan dialect and the Rovte dialects. It is present in the Selca Valley along the Selca Sora, up to around Praprotno, where it transitions into the Škofja Loka dialect. To the north, it is bounded by Ratitovec and Jelovica and to the south by the Škofja Loka Hills. The dialect is spoken west to Podporezen and Petrovo Brdo, south to Davča and Zapreval, east to Praprotno and Strmica, and north to Dražgoše and Zgornje Danje. The border between its subdivisions is between Podlonk and Železniki. Notable settlements include Železniki, Zgornja Sorica, Zali Log, Studeno, Dražgoše, Selca, Dolenja Vas, and Praprotno.[3]

Accentual changes

The dialect still retains length distinctions, except for and , which became significantly shorter than other long vowels, and short *-ì and *-ù turned into schwa (ə).[5] Eastern microdialects also retain pitch accent. The microdialects in Slovenski lingvistični atlas show a rather clear divide between the tonal and non-tonal dialects;[6] however, Matej Šekli is rather vague when discussing which microdialects are tonal, saying only that some are tonal and some are not.[7] It has undergone only the *ženȁ*žèna accent shift.[8]

Phonology

The dialect is rather poorly studied, and the only microdialect covered in detail is the Selca microdialect, which this section focuses on.

The phonology is similar to that of the Upper Carniolan dialect. It evolved from the southern proto-dialect, which was characterized by early lengthening of non-final vowels, which are now represented by the same sound.[7] The dialect lacks diphthongs for the most part, which is a rarity for Slovene dialects, but common for the Upper Carniolan dialect. Generally, all long e-like sounds turned into ẹː and all long o-like sounds turned into ọː. *e and *o that became stressed after the *ženȁ*žèna shift are open-mid and , respectively. One of the key differences that distinguishes it from the Upper Carniolan dialect is the shortening of long *ī and *ū because of the influence of the Rovte dialects. Stressed syllabic *ł̥ turned into oːu̯ and * turned into ər. Long *ə̄ turned into .[9]

There is extensive syncope and a many short vowels were reduced, to an even greater extent than in the Upper Carniolan dialect. Short stressed *, *, and *-ě̀ have all turned into ə; the same holds true most of the time for their unstressed counterparts. If these sounds are adjacent to l, m, or n, they often turn into syllabic , , and . Ukanye (ou) is present for initial *o-. The most commonly omitted vowel is *i, which is often omitted in final position, and sometimes also medially. Omissions of *ə, *ě, and *u are also common.[5]

However, consonants did not experience as much simplification as in the Upper Carniolan dialect. Most of the dialects lack shvapanye (*ł). Secondary palatalization of velars before front vowels and spirantization of stops is not particularly common; however, these features vary from dialect to dialect.[7] The cluster *šč, at least in the Selca dialect, has simplified into š, and palatal *ĺ and *ń depalatalized and merged with *l and *n, respectively. Initial o- received a prosthetic or v.[10] Final obstruents still retain voicing.[11] In Sorica in the westernmost part of the dialect, alveolar *s, *z, and *c merged with post-alveolar *š, *ž, and *č, respectively. This is a feature more common in the Bača subdialect.[12]

Morphology

Little is known about the morphology. The ending -om in o-stem nouns turned into -am, and nouns ending in -l̥ have an -n- infix before the ending. The infinitive does not have the ending -i; however, too little research has been done to accentually determine whether the infinitive is short or long. There is masculinization of neuter nouns,[5][13] but it is unknown whether feminization also occurs in the plural.

References

  1. ^ Smole, Vera. 1998. "Slovenska narečja." Enciklopedija Slovenije vol. 12, pp. 1–5. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga, p. 2.
  2. ^ Priestly, Tom S. 1984. "O popolni izgubi srednjega spola v selščini: enodobni opis," Slavistična revija 32: 37-47.
  3. ^ a b c "Karta slovenskih narečij z večjimi naselji" (PDF). Fran.si. Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša ZRC SAZU. Retrieved June 8, 2020.
  4. ^ Šekli (2018:335–339)
  5. ^ a b c Benedik (1995:56–58)
  6. ^ Škofic, Jožica; et al. (2016). SLOVENSKI lingvistični atlas. 2, Kmetija [Kartografsko gradivo] (in Slovenian). Ljubljana: Založba ZRC. pp. 12–15. ISBN 978-961-254-879-7.
  7. ^ a b c Šekli (2018:333)
  8. ^ Šekli (2018:311–314)
  9. ^ Benedik (1995:55)
  10. ^ Benedik (1995:57–58)
  11. ^ Toporišič, Jože. 1992. Enciklopedija slovenskega jezika. Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba, pp. 52–53.
  12. ^ Logar (1996:3)
  13. ^ Logar (1996:9)

Bibliography

  • Logar, Tine (1996). Kenda-Jež, Karmen (ed.). Dialektološke in jezikovnozgodovinske razprave [Dialectological and etymological discussions] (in Slovenian). Ljubljana: Znanstvenoraziskovalni center SAZU, Inštitut za slovenski jezik Frana Ramovša. ISBN 961-6182-18-8.
  • Šekli, Matej (2018). Legan Ravnikar, Andreja (ed.). Tipologija lingvogenez slovanskih jezikov (in Slovenian). Translated by Plotnikova, Anastasija. Ljubljana: Znanstvenoraziskovalni center SAZU. ISBN 978-961-05-0137-4. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)