Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cumbey: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:11, 13 April 2005

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with ~~~~~}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 08:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC). This page was reverted by User:Mark, ~~without adequate explanation~~ upon request of User:Kc9cqj who was working on the RfC but requested reversion. I have now reverted it at: --SqueakBox 16:37, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC), and suggest the 48 hours start from now

(Cumbey | talk | contributions)

Statement of the dispute

Cumbey is engaging in personal attacks off of the Wikipedia site, has been known to blank user pages, and violates the 3RR policy on a consistent basis, within the Javier Solana article. Although she may or may not be responsible, the following IP addresses also exhibit Cumbey-like behavior.

Description

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Evidence of disputed behavior

(provide diffs and links)

[1]Shows Cumbey's off-site blog where SqueakBox and One Salient Oversight are named by username. Identical to her user page accusing SB and OSO of vandalism.
Blanked this RfC entirely as shown here as user 68.61.150.80.
Deleted this comment on Chris 73's userpage written by SqueakBox.
Cumbey accuses SqueakBox and One Salient Oversight of vandalism here.

Applicable policies

{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

No personal attacks.
Complete blanking of an RfC.

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

One Salient Oversight has attempted to resolve the dispute by a post to Cumbey's blog here. After his/her comment to Cumbey's original comment regarding Wikipedia, OSO and SqueakBox were both mentioned in Cumbey's next blog comment.

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

SqueakBox 17:44, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{inuse}}
-In order to remain listed at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the ''same'' dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: <tt>{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)</tt>. This page was reverted by [[User:Mark]], without adequate explanation. I have now reverted it at: --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 16:37, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC), and suggest the 48 hours start from now
+In order to remain listed at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the ''same'' dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: <tt>{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)</tt>. This page was reverted by [[User:Mark]], <s>without adequate explanation</s> upon request of [[User:Kc9cqj]] who was working on the RfC but requested reversion. I have now reverted it at: --[[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 16:37, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC), and suggest the 48 hours start from now
 ----
 *([[User:Cumbey|Cumbey]] | [[User talk:Cumbey|talk]] | [[Special:contributions/Cumbey|contributions]])