Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment

Wikipedia articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FL				1			1
GA			3	12			15
B	9	7	14	21		1	52
C	5	32	43	62			142
Start		15	72	160			247
Stub				11			11
List	2	1	7	6		1	17
Category					115		115
Disambig					3		3
File					47		47
Project					174		174
Redirect		1	7	42	94		144
Template					38		38
NA					3		3
Other					34		34
Assessed	16	56	146	315	508	2	1,043
Total	16	56	146	315	508	2	1,043
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 2,055			Ω = 4.40

Welcome to the assessment department of the Wikipedia WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia-related articles (for scope, see the WikiProject page). While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Wikipedia articles by quality and Category:Wikipedia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

See also the general assessment FAQ

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.

2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?

Just add {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.

3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?

Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).

4. Who can assess articles?

Any member of WikiProject Wikipedia is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.

5. How do I rate an article?

Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.

6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

7. What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale.

8. Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

9. What if I have a question not listed here?

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Wikipedia articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Wikipedia articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Wikipedia articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Wikipedia articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Wikipedia articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Wikipedia articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Wikipedia articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Wikipedia articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Wikipedia articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Wikipedia pages)		Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Wikipedia pages)		Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Wikipedia pages)		Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Wikipedia pages)		File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Wikipedia pages)		Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Wikipedia pages)		Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Wikipedia pages)		Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Wikipedia pages)		Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Wikipedia pages)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Wikipedia articles)		???

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	30 years war
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Wikimedia Foundation
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wikitravel
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Bellevue School District
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Geographical bias on Wikipedia
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of Wikipedias
Category	Any category falls under this class.	Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area.	Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized.	Category:Wikimedia
Disambig	Any disambiguation page falls under this class.	The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title.	Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title.	Wikipedia (disambiguation)
File	Any page in the file namespace falls under this class.	The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content.	Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited.	File:Wiki.png
Portal	Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class.	Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics.	Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date.	N/A
Project	All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class.	Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development.	Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project.	Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia
Redirect	Any redirect falls under this class.	The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location.	Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles.	Wikipedia:List of media personalities who have vandalised Wikipedia
Template	Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes.	Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles.	Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information.	Template:Wikipedia
NA	Any non-article page that fits no other classification.	The page contains no article content.	Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified.	N/A

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Wikipedia|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Wikipedia articles)		Top
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Wikipedia articles)		High
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Wikipedia articles)		Mid
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Wikipedia articles)		Low
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Wikipedia articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Wikipedia articles)		???

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Wikipedia.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

WikiProject article importance scheme

Importance	Criteria	Example
Top	Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field.	Wikipedia
High	Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent.	Wikimania
Mid	Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area.	Polish Wikipedia
Low	Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article.	Malayalam Wikipedia
NA	Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc.	Category:Wikipedia
???	Subject importance has not yet been assessed.	Magnus Manske

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

• Requesting reassessment of HP Spectre (currently Start but I think it deserves an upgrade) --Privateeih (talk) 00:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
• Requesting reassessment of Christian LeBlanc. Feebs592 (talk) 22 May 2024 (UTC)
• Requesting reassessment of Lake freighter --Wannabefirefly (talk) 02:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
• Requesting reassessment of Stein Valley Nlaka'pamux Heritage Park Mrfoogles (talk) 00:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
• Requesting reassessment of Jamath Shoffner Joeykai (talk) 23:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
• Requesting reassessment of Lexi Missimo Joeykai (talk) 23:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
• Requesting reassessment of Hillary Beall Joeykai (talk) 23:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
• Requesting assessment of Cornelius Williams (American football). TarheelBornBred (talk) 10:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @TarheelBornBred, assessed as C. Added WikiProjects to the talk page. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Jim Corrigan (basketball). TarheelBornBred (talk) 3:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @TarheelBornBred, assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Eugene Harris (basketball). TarheelBornBred (talk) 3:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @TarheelBornBred, assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Im Si-wan. Klorofil (talk) 07:23, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @Klorofil, upgraded assessment from Start to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Sandra Paños Joeykai (talk) 13:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

   Partly done @Joeykai, upgraded assessment from Stub to C. Please address the notices I added where citations are needed and then reply here and I will upgrade to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @Joeykai, upgraded to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Bernard Barrow, a stub I've expanded. Feebs592 (talk) 18 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @Feebs592, upgraded assessment from stub to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Águia de Marabá Futebol Clube. LucasMRB (talk) 20:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @LucasMRB upgraded assessment from Stub to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Patrizia Panico Joeykai (talk) 20:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @Joeykai upgraded assessment from Stub to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Jisaburō Ozawa. Meeepmep (talk) 06:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @Meeepmep upgraded assessment from Start to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting an initial assessment of Abigail Klein. Feebs592 (talk) 17 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start @Feebs592. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting an initial assessment of Victory Salute (statue). SammySpartan (talk) 17 May 2024 (UTC)

   Already done by @Johnsoniensis, who assessed as B, @SammySpartan. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of 1997 Prairie Dell-Jarrell tornado.MemeGod ._. (My talk page, my contributions and my creations!) 18:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

   Already done assessed as C @MemeGod27 Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks, but something I noticed was that it was assessed as “low” class for weather. It’s one of the most well-known tornadoes of all time, and the outbreak article is assessed as mid-class solely because of the tornado. MemeGod ._. (My talk page, my contributions and my creations!) 21:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done upgraded importance to Mid from Low @MemeGod27. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Silas Demary Jr.. TarheelBornBred (talk) 3:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @TarheelBornBred, assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Justin Hill (basketball). TarheelBornBred (talk) 3:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @TarheelBornBred, assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Terry Roberts (basketball). TarheelBornBred (talk) 3:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @TarheelBornBred, assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Noah Thomasson. TarheelBornBred (talk) 3:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @TarheelBornBred, assessed as Start. I added several citation needed notices that need attention. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Gahanna-Lincoln High School. I don't even know how long it's been since it's been rated, but it was made in 2007, has been heavily expanded, and is honestly pretty long now. I think it has been start class for 8+ years now. MemeGod ._. (My talk page, my contributions and my creations!) 00:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

   Not done as there are not enough inline citations verifying statements made in the article. @MemeGod ._. please add citations or remove content that can not be verified. Then re-request assessment. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Western Collegiate Lacrosse League. It's initial assesment was in 2010, and I have added roughly 26,000 bytes in the last 2 years. SammySpartan (talk) 8 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @SammySpartan, assessed as C. Please address the notice on the page regarding the need for more inline citations. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Hello, I am wondering if someone could offer an assessment of the stub I have expanded, Literary fragment. Thanks for your time. Alsonamedbort15 (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

   Already done by @Patrick Welsh, who assessed as Start. @Alsonamedbort15, please be aware that there is a notice on the article regarding the verifiability of the lists. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting a first assessment of Democracy in Asia. HudecEmil (talk) 20:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @HudecEmil, assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• It's my first time requesting a reassessment of any article, so please do pardon me if I make some informal requests but I think Gupta–Hunnic Wars deserves more than a C rating. Can't it be upgraded to B, GA or even an A rating? Jonharojjashi (talk) 16:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

   Not done @Jonharojjashi there are numerous issues that must be addressed before any re-assessment can take place. The lead is much too long. There are far too many statements that lack inline citations. There is also an issue with the neutrality of the article. Only after these things are addressed can we re-assess this article. Please re-request once these are fixed. Thanks. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Kyah Simon Joeykai (talk) 05:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done upgraded assessment from Start to C. @Joeykai. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Minnesota State Highway 36. NotDragonius (talk) 00:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

   Already done by @Imzadi1979, who assessed as B @NotDragonius. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting a first assessment of Anglo-German Payments Agreement. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 13:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Done @,AbsoluteWissen, assessed as B.Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Patricia Guijarro Joeykai (talk) 15:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Done @Joeykai, upgraded assessment from Stub to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Wikipedia and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the article has been significantly expanded since its assessment in December 2023. Isi96 (talk) 01:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @Isi96: Upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Midge Purce Joeykai (talk) 22:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

   Done @Joeykai assessed as C. Very good article. Could use some more expanding. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of George W. Minns. It's initial assesment was in 2007, and I have added roughly 10,000 bytes in the last few months. SammySpartan (talk) 2 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done SammySpartan upgraded assessment from Stub to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Jaedyn Shaw Joeykai (talk) 22:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done @Joeykai, assessed as C. Expand more throughout the Early life and career sections if possible to get up to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Requests from 2024, January to April

➡ Requests from April 2024: ⬇ 🔵 30 of 31 requests done: 96.8% complete Requesting reassessment of Patrick_Troughton. It's been "Start Class for a while, but I feel it is at least a C if not a B. Rankersbo (talk) 12:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)  Done assessed as B @Rankersbo Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Regina's historic buildings and precincts. It's currently rated a "B" class, but I think that's way over-rated, for reasons discussed on the Talk page. I'm not familiar with how assessments work and would like a new pair of eyes looking at it. I will try to improve it, but I think it needs a new baseline to start with. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of ICIMOD. I have completely rewritten this page over September 2022 - April 2024, added several sections and categories to it. Its existing assessment was done in 2006. The article stands significantly improved, and is of interest to several Wikiprojects in addition to those originally visible on its talk page. (talk) 28 April 2024  Done upgraded assessment to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Mount Scenery. I've added 10,000+ bytes (three new sections, references, images). Last assessment was Stub. Wondering if now C or B. Thank you! CareAhLine (talk) 01:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment to B. @CareAhLine Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Money Money 2020. I've added over 4,000 bytes to the article, an entirely new section, added citations for almost all claims on the article and generally cleaned it up a lot. I no longer believe it should be classed as a stub. Beachweak (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment to Start @Beachweak Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting a re-assessment of Meralgia paraesthetica. I have added 10,000 bytes, doubling the article size, and my edits are so extensive that I now have 80% authorship of the content. Snake playing a saxaphone (talk) 07:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)  Done Upgraded assessment to B @Snake playing a saxaphone Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment for Orbital (1991 album). I've updated the page significantly and replaced unreliable sources with more reliable ones. Also, I think this page was last assessed in 2009, and I think there has been plenty of new information added since then, not just from me. Tedster41 (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)  Done Upgraded from Start to C assessment. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment for Transvaal Park. I've added over 6,000 bytes of information since it's initial review. – ReaganMc101 20:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded from Start to C. I would suggest adding a citation at the end of the lead. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment for Yelabuga drone factory. I've added about 10,600 bytes since its initial assessment of Stub Class. Thank you! – Primium (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment for Movement of the First. I've added over 15,000 bytes of information since it's initial review. – Primium (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)  Done Upgraded assessment to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassesment for Shahed drones. I've added about 30,000 bytes since its previous review, which scored it at Stub Class. Rater predicts B or higher with 93.2% confidence. – Primium (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)  Done Upgraded assessment to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for 2018–19 Point Loma Nazarene Sea Lions men's basketball team. JTtheOG (talk) 08:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)  Done Assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for 321 Coffee, which was added to the mainspace on April 12 but has undergone significant revisions. Currently ranked at Start-class, but I believe it should be C- or maybe even B-Class. Dallasoliver (talk) 19:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Amie Parnes, which was just added to the mainspace yesterday. Currently ranked at Start-class, but Rater is predicting a rating of B-Class or higher with 93.9% accuracy. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assesment for Draft:Hirohara Shrine. A user with the name User:WC gudang inspirasi disregarded WP:AFCREVIEW and moved the page from Draftspace to Mainspace. Reverted back but assesment scale still asses it as 'redirect', halting the review process. the same user have done the same unauthorized moves with other draft articles and moving it to Mainspace. Kaliper1 (talk) 02:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC) Retracted, Fixed! Requesting an assessment for Minia Biabiany. I have updated its sources, which appeared to be its main issue. User:ScorpioSunLibraMoon (talk) 9:50, 21 April (EST)  Done User:ScorpioSunLibraMoon, upgraded assessment from Start to C. Requesting an assessment for Community gardens in New York City. It has been expanded upon since its original assessment in 2019. 9H48F (talk) 02:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment to B @9H48F Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Tone_(linguistics), it has been significantly expanded upon and reliable sources have been added with greater detail. Justanotherinternetguyt@lk 13:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)  Done @Justanotherinternetguy upgraded assessment from Start to C. This could be a B article, though there is a need for more inline citations. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for George Robert Carruthers which I have significantly modified and expanded. Physhist (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)  Done Assessed as B-class. Great effort. Make sure to verify anything without a citation - it looks like that honorary doctorate may have been fabricated. Reconrabbit 18:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Pottawatomie Park, which I have just created. Dan • ✉ 06:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as C by @Slgrandson Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Thomas Baker (Alaska politician). I have expanded the article significantly Sipik06 (talk)  Done upgraded assessment from Stub to Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Botswana after re-reading, adding sources, updating data and images, adding context, and paragraphs. I would like to know if it is B-class worthy. 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as B by @48JcL48 Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Diocese of Churches for the Sake of Others, which has been completely rewritten after COI editing and copyvios. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment from Start to Stub. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Ralph Brazelton Peck which I've updated and expanded. D McParland (talk) 23:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)  Done @D McParland, upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Carson Beck. I believe that the article should be assessed higher than start class following updates and expansions.--BullDawg2021 (talk) 21:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)  Done @BullDawg2021, upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for 1955 riots at the Pakistani embassy and consulates in Afghanistan, the page has been gone through enough changes so i put it up for assessment. Rahim231 (talk) 15:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded from Start to C @Rahim231 Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Swim School, it has undergone some improvements by me & another editor and want an opinion! :) Georgeykiwi (talk 23:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)  Done assessed as B-class. Still needs some copyedits here and there but overall, great work! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of S. L. Rose. The page has been expanded greatly since it was originally ranked a stub when I first created it, and it definitely merits more than a stub in its current state. TarheelBornBred (talk 02:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)  Done assessed as C-class; consider expanding the Business subsection. Requesting assessment of Dirty Epic. It used to be a redirect but I have turned into a page and I would like to get it assessed as it has not been done so yet. Tedster41 (talk) 09:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as C by @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Carl Bunch. Originally ranked as a stub, I've expanded the page significantly. Rater predicts the article could be considered as B or higher with 86% accuracy. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 19:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)  Done assessed as C @Pac-Man PHD. To get to B, it will need more independent sources and more information in each section. Go into more detail please. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Remembrance Day (Hong Kong), which I created and expanded, for C class. CanonNi (talk) 07:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)  Not done @CanonNi, as it is still Start. To get to C, the article will need more inline citations and more information. After reading, I am left wanting more on the topic. Please do this and re-request assessment. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC) ➡ Requests from March 2024: ⬇ 🔵 16 of 16 requests done: 100% complete Requesting reassessment of Conservative Congregational Christian Conference. Significantly improved, currently start class.Dirkwillems (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)  Done @Dirkwillems upgraded assessment from Start to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Higher education in Norway Recently added multiple sections to the article Kjedsomstudent (talk) 29 March 2024  Already done by @Ipigott, who assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting for The Romans in their Decadence, recently finished translating from FR. Orchastrattor (talk) 20:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded from Stub to Start @Orchastrattor Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of the Second Shehbaz Sharif ministry page, currently assessed as a stub it has been significantly re-written and expanded in the past week. Canned Knight (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)  Done @Canned Knight. I upgraded the assessment from Stub to B. Please nominate this article for GA for further assessment. Very well put together. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Maya Higa. It is rated as a start class on 6 April 2021, it has been significantly improved for the last 3 years. Http iosue (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)  Done @Http iosue, upgraded assessment from Start to B. Great work! Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of James Maddison, which was assessed back in 2016 as start-class and has been significantly expanded upon. Pksois23 (talk) 01:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting re-assessment of St Philip's Hospital, Sheffield Street, improvements have been made today and it (should) no longer be stub class. Rater claims it to be C class. CommissarDoggoTalk? 18:55, 20 March 2024 (UTC)  Done @CommissarDoggo upgraded assessment from Stub to Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Transgender people in Nazi Germany, which has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.13tez (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)  Already done; assessed to B-class by @Hilst on March 19. CanonNi (talk) 08:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment/reassessment of Dee D. Jackson, which has been significantly expanded upon, cited to a greater extent and brought up to a more encyclopedic state of existence compared to its previous assessment as a stub-class article. TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 17:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)  Done upgradded assment from Stub to Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Thank you very much! ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 01:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment/reassessment of Tiziana Rivale, which has been significantly expanded upon, cited to a greater extent and brought up to a more encyclopedic state of existence compared to its previous assessment as a stub-class article. TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 17:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)  Done to C-class. TheMysteriousShadeheart consider adding sources to the discography section, which is completely unsourced at the moment. Especially the rankings should be sourced. Broc (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC) Greatly appreciated! Shall source right away. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC) Requestig Assessment of Talkata yet to be assessed ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ (talk) 18:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)  Already done by @Reconrabbit, who assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Omnichord, a stub class article that has recently been expanded. InDimensional (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)  Done to B-class. InDimensional Very interesting topic, and it inspired me to do a little research myself. I found information on how the Omnichord has been used as a form of musical therapy, which I think will add a lot to the page. Anyway, this was well written and cited, though I wish there were more reputable/non-primary sources out there. I had to remove one of your in-line citations however as it didn't provide any information. I looked for a suitable source to replace it but I was unable to find anything, so keep that in mind when looking on how to improve the article. Cheers, Pac-Man PHD (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Thanks for taking the time and for the edits, I went through your changes and took some mental notes for the future. Agreed on the primary resources but there was some conflicting info about years of releases so they'll do for now. I will have to check out that article. Cheers. InDimensional (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Uvula (band). It was assessed to be a stub on 17 April 2023, but has undergone much expansion since then. Dubna8 (talk) 06:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment from Stub to Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Battle of Batumi. It is rated as a start class, although it has been significantly improved recently. Bailer99 (talk) 04:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Note user is a confirmed sockpuppet of @ArsenalAtletico2017 and has been blocked. CanonNi (talk) 08:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting re-assessment of Willy's Chocolate Experience. Originally rated as start class on the 28th last month, I believe it's since been improved a whole bunch and WP:RATER now estimates it's at B class. I concur with this, but an unbiased opinion would be appreciated. CommissarDoggoTalk? 17:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)  Already done @Voorts Assessed this last night, now B class. CommissarDoggoTalk? 11:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Maarjamäe, which I expanded on majorly recently. Would the future addition of images (planning to take in spring-summer) affect the assessment? Many thanks. MartinusK (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC) It would definitely be at least a C class, the Evad37/rater prediction is saying "B or higher" with 90.5% accuracy. I want to also point out the transport section has no sources. Shadow311 (talk) 00:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)  Done @MartinusK assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC) ➡ Requests from February 2024: ⬇ 🔵 52 of 52 requests done: 100% complete Requesting assessment of Dylan Cartlidge, which I created last year and has yet to be assessed. WidgetKid (talk) 22:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done begocc questions? 08:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Chris Holmes (DJ and musician), which I recently created and has yet to be assessed. WidgetKid (talk) 22:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)  Done, Assessed at start class, although article feels a bit POV, it reads ok. nice job! begocc questions? 08:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Landed (Ben Folds song), which I recently created and has yet to be assessed. WidgetKid (talk) 22:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)  Done,Assessed as start class, article has a bit too many quotes from folds, though. begocc questions? 08:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Dan Goodwin, which I created years ago and has yet to be assessed. WidgetKid (talk) 22:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done Shadow311 (talk) 00:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Kangaroo Route, It has not been assessed since 2007 when it was 6 sentences long and many editors (including myself) have put significant build out in the last 17 years towards the B Class checklist :). DigitalExpat (talk) 07:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)  Done, Assessed as B class, great work! CanonNi (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Many thanks for your time and fair assessment @CanonNi, there were/are a lot of great contributors over the years! DigitalExpat (talk) 05:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Sault Ste. Marie Museum, I have expanded it greatly from its "stub" status. FUNgus guy (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)  Done, @Fungus Guy: assessed as B class and added some minor corrections. Broc (talk) 07:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Hester Street, since I have recently edited it to provide a much more detailed, up-to-date picture of its subject matter. Loneclaire (talk) 18:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)  Done, upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessments of Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody and City of L.A. Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart I've created both of these pages and they have yet to be assessed. Tinfoilhat8001 (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)  Done Shadow311 (talk) 19:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of George S. Gaadt, which I spent yesterday rounding out and improving. Thanks in advance! Puppies937 (talk) 03:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)  Done @Puppies937, upgraded assessment from Stub to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Brian Barnhart which I assisted on in October 2022. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  23:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)  Done @GhostOfDanGurney, upgraded assessment from Stub to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Battles for Vilnius (1918-1919).Its been on mainspace for 3 months and i have expanded it since.  Already done Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Please rate the Talk:Egov.Press article. Please rate the EgovPress article. If possible, corrected it to category B. Zzremin (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC) Note user is a confirmed sockpuppeteer and has been blocked. CanonNi (talk) 08:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)  Not done as page does not exist. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Banque de l'Indochine Building, Shanghai Daftation 🗩 🖉 12:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done @Daftation by @DoubleGrazing, who assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of the Wargasm (band). I have expanded the article over the last few months. Georgeykiwi (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC) @Georgeykiwi  Done content-wise it's a B-class in my opinion, I rated it "C" only because many of the references are dead, making verification difficult. If you rescue them, please ping me and I'll up the rating. Broc (talk) 11:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) @Broc i have fixed all of the dead links! thank you :) George (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of the Parasram Maderna, which was initially a stub. I have expanded the article a few days ago. $arthakP (talk) 12:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done by @Begocc who assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Rohan Bopanna, I have added many sources and expanded the article in last few weeks. PrinceofPunjabTALK 06:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done by @Begocc, who assessed as B. @PrinceofPunjab Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Mexia Supermarket‎, I spent most of my day creating the page on a whim so it'd be nice to get it assessed as I'm thinking of potentially putting it in for a DYK. CommissarDoggoTalk? 19:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)  Done I fixed some minor style issues and rated it B-class as the article is well sourced and detailed; if you want additional feedback let me know. Broc (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Tapir! - I gave it an assessment of C class myself, but I'd like an independent review to see if it hits B class (I think it does, but I might be biased since I wrote it). Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 08:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done, assessed as GA by @Tails Wx. Congratulations. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Paradox of Tolerance. I spent a lot of time expanding this a few weeks ago and requested an assessment via the Philosophy WikiProject, but following the changes to the assessment process I'm resubmitting my request here. Thanks! Ddevault (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done by @Begocc who assessed as B @Ddevault Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Chachmei Lublin Yeshiva. Article assessed as stub class in WikiProject Poland, and start class in Wikiproject Judaism. Expansions were made, along with some recent note-worthy content. It has been greatly expanded over the past 17 years. NeverBeGameOver (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as C by @Begocc @NeverBeGameOver Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Zen of Python. Article is assessed as stub class and I have made some improvements since then [[1]] Erictleung (talk) 19:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)  Done Broc (talk) 13:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Capital punishment in Georgia (country). Article was assessed as stub class in 2008 and contained only one paragraph back then, but now I have added much more content.Srguan (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done by @Begocc who assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Parliament of Georgia. Article was assessed as start class in 2009, but it has undergone many changes since then and has been upgraded significantly.Srguan (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done by @Begocc who assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Conservative Party of Japan. Article was made last year and still doesn't have an assessment. Anime King 🎌 (💬) (talk) 13:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC) @Anime King  Done. Small suggestion for improvement: add translations of the Japanese titles in the references. You can use |trans-title= in {{Cite web}}. Broc (talk) 10:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of 2024 Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) leadership election. Article was made last year and still doesn't have an assessment. Anime King 🎌 (💬) (talk) 13:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done Shadow311 (talk) 00:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment for Li Yundi. It was last assessed 17 years ago in 2007. I believe it fits the criteria for B-class. Also, I would like a reassessment of its importance. I believe it fits the criteria high, as the page is about a world-renowned pianist. Thanks EleniXDD (talk) 09:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Wow, thanks for the assess of biography. That’s quick. Is it possible to also assess the two related wiki projects and evaluate their importance. Thanks a lot EleniXDD (talk) 09:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done Assessed as B and Mid importance. Article is currently a GA nominee. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Sydney van Hooijdonk. It is currently rated Stub, and has been since 2019 despite major work on it since. I believe it fits the criteria for C-class, but would like an outside opinion on this, and if not C-class, which class it currently sits in. Christhecoolboy (talk) 16:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)  Done @Christhecoolboy upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Tyler1. To the best of my knowledge it has not had an assessment since the article was first created in 2018. I believe it is a B class or close to it, and I would appreciate feedback to better understand the criteria for BLP articles like this. Mokadoshi (talk) 23:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)  Done @Mokadoshi upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Brownies & Downies. CommissarDoggoTalk? 02:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)  Done I think Start class makes sense here because the majority of the article is specifically about the South African branch which no longer exists. I also believe extraneous detail should be removed. For example, a whole paragraph on Schultz's fiancé is not significantly relevant to a business with over 50 locations. With more English sources about the overall business this article would be greatly improved. I understand the frustration since there aren't many English sources. As an aside, it's worth mentioning that the article relies heavily on references to TimesLive which is on the Usable but be cautious list. I also fixed a minor duplicated reference. Mokadoshi (talk) 07:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC) Thanks, I actually put in a request on WikiProject Netherlands out of a hope that some people there could grab some more info from Dutch sources just to make sure I don't mess up on some translation, but I'll probably end up just doing it myself. As for the fiancé situation I forgot to put in what actually made it a problem, the fact that the business was under threat. That being said, I don't think it was ever really specified why the business was under threat because of her being barred from the country so I'll probably just remove that para entirely. CommissarDoggoTalk? 10:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Nikos Goumas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done Shadow311 (talk) 19:22, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Dimitris Volonakis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Michalis Simigdalas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Spyros Pomonis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Andreas Theodoropoulos article which I created.BEN917 10:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done - by @Begocc on 2 February 2024. Assessed as Start. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 11:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Babis Psimogiannos article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Nikos Stathopoulos article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Spyros Stefanidis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done - by @Begocc on 2 February 2024. Assessed as Start. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 10:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Giorgos Skrekis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC) @BEN917  Done rated as Start but the article has major sourcing issues, most of the statements in the page are unsourced. Please reach out if you need help with referencing. Broc (talk) 13:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Lazaros Papadopoulos (footballer) article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Not done I left some questions regarding the sources on the talk page. Lets discuss more there. Mokadoshi (talk) 07:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Apostolos Toskas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Dionysis Tsamis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Done Broc (talk) 13:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Giannis Mousouris article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Michalis Tzirakis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Tagged with needing more sources. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Spyros Thodis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Tagged with needing more sources. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Stavros Letsas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as Start. Ktkvtsh (talk) 05:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Panagiotis Stylianopoulos article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Done - @BEN917, assessed as Start-class for now. Can be C-class article. JoeNMLC (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Giorgos Peppes article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Done - @BEN917, assessed as Start-class. JoeNMLC (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Stavros Stamatis article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Done - @BEN917, assessed as Start-class. JoeNMLC (talk) 20:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Kostas Vasiliou article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Done - @BEN917, assessed as Start-class. "Honours" section need references, otherwise can be a C-class article. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 10:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the Dimitris Pittas article which I created.BEN917 10:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Done - @BEN917, assessed as Start-class. JoeNMLC (talk) 10:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Srettha Thavisin, which has been significantly updated and expanded over the past weeks. Thanks! Bossza007 Here (talk) 02:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)  Done assessed as B-class. CanonNi (talk) 08:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC) ➡ Requests from January 2024: ⬇ 🔵 31 of 31 requests done: 100% complete Requesting a reassessment of Bertram Fletcher Robinson, which has been significantly updated and expanded over the past few months and which, now also includes new original material and images. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksamil (talk • contribs) 16:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Ktkvtsh, assessed as GA. – Primium (talk) 17:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Bruno Gaido, which I have been working on for a while and is now far more comprehensive than it was at its last assessment in January 2022 Wasianpower (talk) 17:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)  Done. Rated B-class. Good job! – Primium (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment for Émile Pouget, which I've significantly expanded and which was previously Stub class. --Aleksamil (talk) 22:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by asilvering, assessed as GA. – Primium (talk) 17:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment for Irish folklore, last assessed in 2018 and is much more detailed since then. Splatterxl – talk 00:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Begocc, assessed as C. – Primium (talk) 17:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for the 1993 in Georgia (country) article which I created.Srguan (talk) 08:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Begocc, assessed as Start. – Primium (talk) 18:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Donuts (album). It was last assessed in 2007 and has improved since then. मल्ल (talk) 04:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Begocc, assessed as C. – Primium (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Old Ironsides (trophy) as it has previously surpassed its current start-class designation. Dionysius Millertalk 14:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Begocc, assessed as C. – Primium (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting re-assessment of Globe effect, which is no longer a stub.Merlitz (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)  Done I confirm Begocc C-class rating, I only made minor stylistic corrections. Broc (talk) 20:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting re-assessment(last was 2012) of Dalit literature, I've since added region and language specific content Rater says B or higher (91.4%) --Miximon (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Deficit 83 Lines. (AlphaBetaGammsh (talk) 02:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC))  Already done by North8000. In addition to North8000's questions / suggestions for improvement, the table notes need citations. – Primium (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of article Chechen Revolution - wrote an article about the event. Previously was a redirect. Relahs (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Begocc. Two notes from my side, @Relahs: have a look at WP:SRF for instructions on how to cite the same work multiple times with different pages, and add more wikilinks :) Broc (talk) 15:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment 3D-Jury after I've worked on improving this former stub status article, the status of which I've removed. Thanks for your review! Erictleung (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Begocc shown here here Erictleung (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of both the Tui T. Sutherland and Wings of Fire (novel series) pages. With deepest gratitude offered to all those involved, I have led the charge in undertaking major overhauls of the entirety of the content of the aforementioned articles, respectively commencing these efforts in August 2022 and January 2023. Seeing as to how these pages have changed exponentially since these efforts were launched, it appears that a quality assessment is again in order. Considering the interdisciplinary output of the affiliated WikiProjects these pages are related, coupled with my consistent presence on these pages (simultaneously preventing vandalism/fancruft and holistically improving sections), an "outsider's" perspective would be most welcome at this time. As always, feedback is welcome and greatly appreciated; I thank you in advance for your time and consideration! ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 05:43, 23 January 2024 (UTC)  Done assessed both as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Thank you very much! ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 01:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment on List of chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh, which I have worked on the leads of the article and the sub sections along with reformatting the tables with a better version and I think it deserves more than a list rating. 456legendtalk 15:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)  Not done as it still qualifies as a list.Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment on both History of the Aurès and Talkata Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ⵟⵓⵔⴽⵉⵙⵀⴽⴰⴱⵢⵍ (talk • contribs) 14:56, 18 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Johnsoniensis. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Downtown Rail Extension which is the most complete article I've created and has had contributions from a plurality of editors. -MJ (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Begocc. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Open Source Tripwire which I expanded from stub yesterday. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by Deltaspace42. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a newer assessment of Clueless, which has had its Production and Release sections expanded. Thank you. Spectrallights (talk) 07:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment to B @Spectrallights. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Jews in Madagascar is for sure not a stub anymore. Zanahary (talk) 10:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Rating already updated by Generalissima. Thanks :) Broc (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC) With the recent ICJ filing the Palestinian genocide accusation article is much more important. Perhaps its importance should be updated, if needed? Scientelensia (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC) The ‘Mid’ tag on the Abu Haggag Mosque article is probably justified, but the article is no longer a stub. Scientelensia (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)  Done@Scientelensia: I can't judge the importance, but I updated the rating to C-class. I also tagged a couple dead links, there is space for further improvement to the article. Broc (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Thank you so much! Scientelensia (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Bob Orders has, in my estimation, proper citations and improved organization which place it around C-class as opposed to start class. Given the minor shift from start to C as the request this is very low priority. Dionysius Millertalk 13:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)  Done@Dionysius Miller: I upped it to C. In my opinion it could even be a B-rated article, but the lead needs some work following MOS:CITELEAD. Broc (talk) 13:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC) @Broc Thanks a bunch! I was completely unaware of the standards for citations in non-BLP leads. I changed those a bit and cleaned it up visually. Dionysius Millertalk 14:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Old Sydney Town, was previously a start article and I've done a lot of work to re-write and cite information. Thank you!! Cheers, GossieGoodTimes (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done was rated as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Bertram Fletcher Robinson. I have added fully referenced and original photographs and content to this article over the past few months and I now believe it fulfils the standard required for GA standard. Therefore, please can I request a reassessment and/or feedback about how to achieve a GA rating for this article. Thanks so much in anticipation of assistance with this request.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.214.91 (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Nubian ibex. I've added a lot of content over the last several months, bringing it from Start-Class to C-Class. Following further edits with in-depth citations, I would like to get the article to B-Class (and ideally GA when possible). Thank you, Bbreslau (talk) 17:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Indian Summer (EP). Created this article and would like it to be assessed. Thank you! 49p (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done by MusicforthePeople Broc (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of Thailand. Major cleanup tags were removed, in addition to some content rewrite, which might need a quality reassessment from external observers for impartiality.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kornkaobat (talk • contribs) 13:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)  Already done assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of History of fantasy. Massive swathes of unsourced or questionably relevant information, all written in a partisan, essayist style. Recently merged with another article so I can only hope the issues were a result of that because there is no way an article this bad should have slipped forward to B-class. Some of the sources are also derived directly from modern authors like Moorcock which seems like it could easily lead to biased writing - Fantasy is a form of genre fiction first and foremost, a work simply having supernatural elements does not warrant inclusion here without strong corroboration. Orchastrattor (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)  Done downgraded from B to C @Orchastrattor Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting a re-assessment of 2023 Azerbaijani offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh. It is currently listed as C-class but I believe I've improved it enough to make it B-class. Hoping to turn this page into a GA one day. Ken Aeron 20:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)  Done following improvements. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a re-assessment of Emblem of Andhra Pradesh. It was in a stub category on the mainspace with start class assessment on it's talk page when I first took up the task to improve it. I have left some considerable amount of time after my development of the article to consider any more user requests and other consideration and everything seems to be fine now. 456legendtalk 08:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)  Not done @456legend: the article lacks clarity. There are too many foreign words without explanation or links, which makes it almost impossible to understand for a casual reader. If clarity is improved, it could be upped to C-class. Ping me if you need help. Broc (talk) 16:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC) @Broc I apologize for not addressing this earlier. I have now rectified the issue and provided clarification for the words. Could you please review the article now? 456legendtalk 03:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)  Done 456legend upped to C-class following improvements. Broc (talk) 07:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting a re-assessment of Circa (company), I added some more details to it, some more references and pushed it past what I would see as a stub - looking for some eyes on it to see whether I'm right on that. Thanks in advance. CommissarDoggoTalk? 19:09, 1 January 2024 (UTC)  Done - CommissarDoggo, I updated from Stub to Start-class along with a few suggestions at Talk page, Assessment section. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Requests from 2023

➡ Requests from December 2023: ⬇ 🔵 31 of 31 requests done: 100% complete Requesting a re-assessment of Liquid consonant, which I have restructured and to which I have added significantly more information. I hope this is also an improvement. Thank you! IlmarisenVasara 22:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @Teangacha upgraded from start to C. To improve assessment, ensure that every statement has a citation. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Thank you si much! IlmarisenVasara 17:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a re-assessment of Kamikaze Hearts, which I had initially assessed as C on 10 December 2022, but I feel that significant improvements have been made since then. Thanks! ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 21:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC) @HelenDegenerate: nice article! I found two issues with sources which I tagged with {{cn}} and {{failed verification}}, once they are solved I would rate it B-class. Broc (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)  Not done @HelenDegenerate as no change was made since the note by @Broc. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of article on the Oesterdam. I have overhauled this as it was previously just a redirect link to the main Delta Works article. I've made it into an article on this dam (the longest in the Delta Works) in its own right. Thanks. D McParland (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)  Already done by @Ruud Buitelaar, who assessed as B. @D McParland Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of articles on Delhi Transport Corporation and Delhi Ring Railway, which I have improved a lot over the past few weeks. Thank you. Kool Nerd 123 (talk) 07:35, 25 December 2023 (UTC)  Done Delhi Ring Railway upgraded assessment from Start to C. Delhi Transport Corporation assessed by @Miximon as C. @Kool Nerd 123. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Kia ora, requesting an assessment of Crate Day, I've updated it to include more background about its origins and related events but not sure if it falls under Start or C now. Cheers. Dudsud (talk) 12:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)  Done Upgraded to C-class; good work Dudsud! It looks like another editor had already bumped it to start-class. For images you may want to check: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Beer_crates Something lacking in the current article is a description of the celebration: to what degree is it a joke, to what degree is it celebrated, how widely, how is it (aside from the becoming drunk part) celebrated. Some parts cited to primary sources on Facebook like "mainstream rock radio station The Rock started The Rock National Crate Day" should be cited to secondary sources if possible. Rjjiii (talk) 05:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Police jury. This is largely a rewrite of an article that did not originally cite sources. Thanks in advance, Rjjiii (talk) 16:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)  Done, Updated to Start class, article needs a tad bit more referencing, but with a few general improvements it will probably become a C-class, Nice job! Begocci (talk) 09:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting an updated assessment of The Patriots (TV series) which is no longer categorised as a stub. I have made minor improvements to the article, but it seems to be above Stub level. Reader781 (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @Reader781: I rated it Start. It would need at least a synopsis to make it to C-class. --Broc (talk) 14:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting an updated assessment of Rudolph Glossop which I have expanded and added a number of citations too. Thank you! D McParland (talk) 21:55, 20 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @D McParland, details at Talk; assessed as C-class and with a few improvements definitely B-class article. Cheeers, JoeNMLC (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC) That's great, thank you D McParland (talk) 13:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC) I kindly request that these articles are assessed. Ọjà and Firewood in Nigeria. Thanks. --Olugold (talk) 10:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)  Already done, assessed as Start by Begocc and assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of No Pants Day which I have improved from a stub. I did not add pants. Cheers! BBQboffingrill me 05:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Rashmika Mandanna that I completely rewrote and added reliable sources to, along with the addition of her work that was uncovered previously. Thank you! Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 13:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Already done, assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:36, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of INS Mahendragiri that I started a few months ago. Thanks!Davidindia (talk) 05:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Not done @Davidindia: it's a rather short page (194 words), which still gets categorized as a stub per WP:STUBDEF. I haven't changed the rating, but feel free to ping me once you expand the article further! I added a couple tags to the article, and made some style changes. Broc (talk) 14:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Thanks a lot! My first article on war ships, so wanted a senior editor to check. Thanks and regards! Davidindia (talk) 15:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)  Done - Davidindia, changed article from Stub to Start-class per Rater assessment tool prediction. JoeNMLC (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Karnataka Motor Sports Club. Thanks! Davidindia (talk) 05:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)  Done assessed as Start. Recommend creating a History section instead of having such a long lead. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Sequence analysis in social sciences. The article exists in its present form since over two years. It was prepared by a group of people from the Sequence Analysis Association but has not been assessed so far. We would appreciate any external opinion on this page. Thank you. --Yensaa (talk) 14:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)  Done assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Automotive industry in China. I have almost rewritten the article and I'm hoping someone could give me opinions on how to improve it by reclassifying it. Thank you! Infinty 0 (talk) 11:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)  Done Upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of North–South Corridor, Singapore. I believe I have significantly expanded the original content and should not be a stub-class any more. Would like someone to help give their opinions on how it could be reclassified. Thank you! Chee Cheong Fun (talk) 08:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)  Done Upgraded assessment from Start to C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Odonestis pruni, which was originally a stub. I think it could be start-class now, but I could really use a fresh set of eyes to assess where it's ended up. Many thanks GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)  Done@GreenLipstickLesbian: upped to C-class. Good job :) Broc (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of a page I made significant updates to: Ecological empathy Thank you! Zen Buddhista (talk) 15:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @Zen Buddhista upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Thank you! Do you have any recommendations on how I could improve it further to achieve GA status? Zen Buddhista (talk) 18:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Adding a historical background section would provide readers with context on the development of this concept. Source quality is crucial; ensure all statements are backed by reliable sources and add citations where needed. Enhance the measurement section by detailing the tools used to assess ecological empathy and discussing their application in research. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of a page I made significant additions to: Cue reactivity Thank you!! Galaxywest (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)  Already done Was assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of a new page Personality neuroscience created by me. Thank you! AbyssMoon124 (talk) 20:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)  Already done Shadow311 (talk) 19:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of a new page I made: Ecological empathy. Thank you! Zen Buddhista (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @Zen Buddhista - assessed to C-class article for now. See Talk "Article assessment" for details. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 17:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC) Thanks for all the additions you made to my article, @JoeNMLC! I love all the Wikilinks you put in. I added a more substantial summary to the lead section (thank you for that suggestion!) and added more Wikipedia links throughout the article. Is it possible to have a reassessment? Thanks for your help with my article! Zen Buddhista (talk) 21:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting a new assessment of Yoshito Hori-assessed as a "Start" back in 2019. I significantly overhauled it since and this biography might qualify as a B. Much appreciated! Furoba (talk) 03:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @Furoba. Upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Remembrance Day (Hong Kong), which I recently created by translating the article in Chinese and would appreciate any feedback. Thank you! CanonNi (talk) 23:57, 7 December 2023  Done @CanonNi - I've assessed this as Start class for now. The main problems are the quality of references. Looking specifically at the Origins section, one of the references is permanently dead, and the citation at the end of the 2nd paragraph only seems to provide a reference to that last sentence and nothing before it (but I can't tell for certain). Lastly, the last sentence in the article has a reference to photos on Facebook, which makes me think this is original research. I'm assuming you can find some English references to the history portions of the article - there is no requirement for English references, but it makes assessment easier. If you improve this further, please submit another request, and feel free to ping me directly to get a quicker response if you want. Mokadoshi (talk) 02:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting a new assessment of Guy Lombardo-now assessed as a "Start". New sections, reference citations, audio links, and additional content has been added & this musician's biography might qualify as a B or GA (a nomination has been posted). Since Lombardo was known as "Mr. New Year's Eve" a speedy review might be useful just in time for the Holiday! Enjoy!. Ciao160.72.80.178 (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)NHPL  Done upgraded assessment from Start to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Portal hypertension, I updated this for a class & would appreciate any feedback. Thank you. Skam1279 (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2023 (UTC)  Done upgraded assessment from C to B @Skam1279 Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Utopian thinking, I created this page mainly summarizing social psychological research on it. I would appreciate any feedback. Thank you! --- Kiwimiho (talk) 19:06, 4 December 2023‎  Done - Kiwimiho (student editor). Asssessed as Start-class, a few "citation needed" tags & plus additional categories. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 23:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Friendship, I added two sections (evolutionary approach and friendship jealousy) and made major changes to the Non-human friendship section (formerly Inter-species friendship). Thank you! --NRodbruin (talk) 16:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)NRodbruin  Done @NRodbruin, upgraded assessment from C to B. This is a very good article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Ecocide, any feedback on specific improvements that can be made really appreciated. John Cummings (talk) 07:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @John Cummings upgraded assessment from C to B. This article looks very good and could possibly pass GA. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Rome Statute, any feedback on specific changes that can be worked on very much appreciated (thinking about trying to get it to FA). Thanks John Cummings (talk) 07:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)  Already done @John Cummings it is rated as C. Work on making sure every statement made has a citation with it. There are very many that need citations in this article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of International Criminal Court, any feedback on specific changes that can be worked on very much appreciated (thinking about trying to get it to FA). Thanks John Cummings (talk) 07:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)  Done @John Cummings, upgraded assessment from C to B. I would recommend working on the citations and ensuring they are properly placed. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Outgroup Favoritism, a psychological bias contrasting ingroup favoritism. Lcupal (talk) 12:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)  Already done Shadow311 (talk) 19:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC) ➡ Requests from November 2023: ⬇ 🔵 16 of 16 requests done: 100% complete Requesting an assessment of Marineros de Ensenada, a Mexican minor league baseball team. JTtheOG (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)  Already done Begocci (talk) 10:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Sinus tarsi syndrome, which I have done my best to improve to bring it up to A class with the input of the peer review. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)  Not done as more expanding and explaining could still be done on the article. It is fairly short as well. @Pear1020 Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of 2023 Micronesian constitutional referendum, which has been overhauled over the last month and is definitely not a stub anymore. Wherethetacos (talk) 04:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @Wherethetacos: Assessed at C class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Intimate relationship following a recent rewrite and overhaul. A.mollusk (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @A.mollusk: Assessed at B class, only because higher classes need more than one person's input. This article has really come a long way! Left my feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Good luck with your GA nomination! Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks so much for your feedback! A.mollusk (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Request reassessment of Susan Schulz. Hopefully my edits have taken it from Stub-class to Start-class.LowellMillGirl (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @LowellMillGirl: Assessed at Start class like you asked. I left some feedback in the edit summary - very good work considering you're a new editor. If you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Thank you @Pear1020. I really appreciate the feedback! LowellMillGirl (talk) 16:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Request reassessment of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow. Article is currently rated Start class, but has substantial sourcing. I have shortened the plot summary and cut down an EXAMPLEFARM to bring it in line with current standards and policy. Hopefully, the newly overhauled article rates at least C Class by now. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @Just Another Cringy Username: Article reassessed at B class by Nick Moyes, though I'm sure you're already aware. Posting this here for record keeping purposes. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Elizabeth Greenfield following an expansion; hopefully no longer Start Class. Rubystaramaryllis (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @Rubystaramaryllis: Assessed at C class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Michael Kremer following a recent rewrite; hopefully no longer Start Class. RegMonkey (talk) 16:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @RegMonkey: Assessed at B class. I didn't have anything to say - the article is pretty much flawless from my perspective. If you have any questions let me know. Good luck with the GA nomination! Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Carl Værnet following a recent overhaul. Zenomonoz (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @Zenomonoz: Assessed at B class. Good job fleshing out the article. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 18:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Neil Robinson (baseball) Onagtruk (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @Onagtruk: Assessed as C-class. See talk page for details. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 04:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Statistical system of Bosnia and Herzegovina AriTheHorse 05:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @AriTheHorse: Assessed as B class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 18:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Mexican actor Jorge Russek. JTtheOG (talk) 02:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @JTtheOG: Assessed as C class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 18:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC) The article MegaCon has been overhauled in the past couple months from a starter class article reading like incomplete tidbits of info into an informative read with much cited research done into the event's history. I'd say this could be a B or even GA class article now. ShadowDragon343 (talk) 01:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @ShadowDragon343 Assessed as C class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 18:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC) I edited both Battle of Cynoscephalae and Pee curl a whole bunch in order to fix some issues (distinct lack of citations (template had been there since 2015) and other historical issues that came with it on Battle of Cynoscephalae - issues in translation, citations and additionally just fleshing out the article on pee curl) and was wondering whether both could potentially be assessed. CommissarDoggo (talk) 14:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)  Partly done @CommissarDoggo: Battle of Cynoscephalae assessed at B class. Thank you for improving the article's sourcing! I left some feedback in the edit summary. Pee curl still has significant issues with the amount of citations (as detailed in the maintenance template), so I have left it at C class. Please let me know if you have any questions. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 18:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC) No questions, just glad they've been looked at and proper pleased that the battle was re-assessed, I just wish I could've found more citations for it than I did. Thanks! CommissarDoggoTalk? 19:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)  Not done as no effort was made to improve citations for Pee curl, it will remain assessed as C. Please re-request assessment once improvements are made please. Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC) I have updated the Marcus Rediker page. It's definitely not stub class anymore. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC) @Pac-Man PHD:  Done Reassessed as B-class. Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 21:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Thank you very much. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 09:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC) I also updated Newborough, Anglesey, this is no longer a start class article. Cltjames (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)  Done @Cltjames: Assessed as B-class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 01:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC) ➡ Requests from October 2023: ⬇ 🔵 16 of 16 requests done: 100% complete Another article I've edited, Aberffraw, Anglesey is no longer a start class because of my additions and needs a better rating. But more importantly, Talk:Aberffraw is listed as Wikiproject city, which it is not, it's a village, and in the talk rating, it is also listed as a Celts project, not too sure about that either, maybe the House of Aberffraw, perhaps a review is needed of the article interests. Cltjames (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC) Please take a look at the descriptions of each WP:PROJECT, "towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia" are under the coverage of WP:CITIES, and "modern day Celtic nations" are under the coverage of WP:CELTS. Hope this helps and hope you get a reassessment soon~ ^^ - azpineapple | T/C 09:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Done. Titus Gold (talk) 01:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Also, requesting Hughes-Hunter baronets article which I've slightly improved, it's no longer a stub. Cltjames (talk) 03:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Cltjames Assessed as Start class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 14:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Also, requesting a connected article, Ellis-Nanney baronets reassessment from the start class, a lot of work was conducted by myself on the article a month ago, and it hasn't been assessed since.Cltjames (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Cltjames: Assessed as B-class. Good job fleshing it out. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 14:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for that assessment. It was originally a redirect, and I felt there I'd written a sufficient article for Hugh Ellis-Nanney to separate into 2. Although both are relatively small, the information about the person and his baronetcy is much improved, and also correctly structured for readers to enjoy learning his biography and peerage. Cltjames (talk) 14:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Hugh Ellis-Nanney please, worked on it a few years ago and fine-tuned the article over the past few months. Cltjames (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Cltjames: Assessed as B-class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 14:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting reassessment of West Point, New York. I've worked on it for a while, and I'm just curious where my contributions got it to. Thanks! ‍ ‍ Relativity ‍ ‍ 03:09, 24 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Relativity: Assessed as B-class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 15:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting (re)assessment of Flyover (Apple Maps). Have added a considerable amount since it was AFC accepted, and I would like to know if the article is C-class yet, or if it still needs more work to get there. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 12:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @47.227.95.73: Assessed as C-class. Good job on improving the article! I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 15:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Request reassessment of Tom Ripley. Article is currently rated as Start class, but has substantial RS. I have also removed a good deal of fluff and original research, resulting in a tighter, more substantive article. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 04:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)  Done Reassessed as C Class by Nick Moyes. Posting this for record-keeping. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Hello, I am requesting an assessment check of Adolf, King of Germany to see if it is B-class worthy. It would be much appreciated by the Holy Roman Empire Task Force. Thank you. User:Momgamer09 (User talk:Momgamer09)  Not done @Momgamer09: While the article is very fleshed out, there simply aren't enough citations to bring it up to B class. Please let me know if you have any questions. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 15:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC) I don’t have any questions. I’ll help work on adding more citations. Thanks for the feedback. Momgamer09 (talk) 13:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC) Hi, I am requesting an assessment of Rubina Yadav, please. Much appreciated! Davidindia (talk) 17:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Davidindia  Done OP reassessed as Start class. Posting here for record keeping purposes. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 15:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Hello—I'm requesting a re-assessment of Saskatoon Valkyries, please. I appreciate it! Other justin (talk) 02:07, 10 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Other justin: Assessed as C-class. Great job fleshing it out. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 15:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC) I would like to request a re-assessment of Konecranes. It has a stub assessment but I added content to it and is now much larger. In my opinion it does not fit that assessment anymore. Yökyöpeli (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Yökyöpeli, Changed from Stub to Start class article. See assessment details here on Talk page. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC) Thank you! Yökyöpeli (talk) 19:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Xujing. Currently unassessed and I have just expanded it recently. - azpineapple | T/C 07:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Azpineapple, Assessed as start-class. See assessment details here on Talk page. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 02:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Thank you! I'll definitely work on this article further once I have time :) - azpineapple | T/C 08:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Cool cool, I should also let you know I recovered two of the sources with IABot after my assessment, so the dead links are no longer an issue. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 00:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC) It appears stats.gov.cn had just decided to move these to a different subdomain. I've found the updated links and added them to the article so all good in that respect now :) - azpineapple | T/C 08:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC) I am requesting an assessment for Exercise Cambrian Patrol, it is currently Start-class but I have improved it massively. Dolphinwaxer (talk) 22:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)  Not done @Dolphinwaxer: The article has no citations and is quite short, making it not qualify for C class at this time. Please let me know if you have any questions. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 15:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV. I have expanded it significantly, and does not fit into the start-class category. I would say this article belongs well into either the B- or C-Class category QuattrostagioniIV (talk) 08:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)  Not done @QuattrostagioniIV: While the article is well written and cited, it is still quite short and therefore does not quite qualify for C class at this time. Please let me know if you have any questions. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 15:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Armenians in Azerbaijan. It's currently rated as stub-class, but definitely doesn't fit in that category. I'm not the one who expanded it, I've just come across it. Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 22:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Sawyer-mcdonell: Assessed as C-class. Good catch! I left some feedback in the edit summary for anyone who is interested, though I know CTOPs are more difficult to fix up. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 15:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC) I would like to request a re-assessment of Weak (AJR song). The article is now much larger than the previous stub assessment. Thanks. Koopastar (talk) 04:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC)  Done @Koopastar: Assessed as C class by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, though I'm sure you're already aware. Posting this here for record-keeping purposes. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC) ➡ Requests from September 2023: ⬇ 🔵 15 of 15 requests done: 100% complete Greetings, requesting an assessment for Lafayette L. Foster's article, which I have recently expanded. Aquabluetesla (talk) 18:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Aquabluetesla: Assessed as C class by Demt1298, though I'm sure you're already aware. Posting this here for record-keeping purposes. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Please can I request an assessment for Bertram Fletcher Robinson, which has been significantly improved since its last assessment some fourteen years ago. Thanks in advance. Prspiring (talk) 12:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)  Not done @Prspiring: While the article is so close to A class, there are some sections missing citations that make it just fall short. A few more citations and it is an easy A class. Frankly there's nothing that couldn't be ironed out in the GA nomination, if you're willing to go that route. Please let me know if you have any questions. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of K-Meleon, after rewrite. Thanks in advance, Rjjiii(talk) 08:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Rjjiii: Assessed as B-class. Agree with the peer reviewer, pretty close to GA. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 20:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Facundo Torres, which I have greatly expanded upon, mostly back in July. Thanks! :) ~~ Raskuly (talk) 02:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Raskuly: Assessed as B class. Great work! I left some feedback in the edit summary, though I had really nothing to say, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask.Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Burn the House Down (song), which has received a high amount of expansion from me. Thank you. Koopastar (talk) 06:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Koopastar: Assessed as start-class. A few statements are unsourced, and the lead could use some work. A few of your sources (youtube, imdb, twitter if possible) also need to be replaced with more reliable ones. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 20:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC) i request that someone assess Gunggari people, which i've been expanding recently. thanks. Yainsley (talk) 01:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Yainsley: Assessed as C-class. Some of the statements are unsourced. History6042 (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC) I am formally requesting that the articles Mel Carnahan and 2000 United States Senate election in Missouri be re-evaluated. I have made significant edits to them, and I believe their current ratings are outdated. Thank you. FountofInterestingInfo (talk) 19:15, 11 September 2023 (UTC)  Done Mel Carnahan: Assessed as C-class. Some simple feedback on article talk page. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 19:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC) Reassessed as B-class following completion of suggested edits. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 19:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC) Choose Love (film) has recently been expanded, mostly by me, following the film's release. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 21:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @CopperyMarrow15: Assessed as C class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC) Pear1020, I have added a citation as you suggested. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 18:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC) @CopperyMarrow15: Good job! I went ahead and reassessed it as B class. Great work on the article. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 14:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of De Olde Molen. This article has been expanded significantly and would benefit from an assessment to ensure it meets Wikipedia's standards. Thank you. Kallmemel (talk) 15:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Kallmemel: Assessed as B class. Good work here, I know these relatively obscure subjects are difficult to source so well. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 16:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Jonathan Allen (journalist). JoeNMLC believed that the article was worthy of being assessed by people more familiar with the subject and/or political journalism. The WP:RATER tool shows "Class B, or better" at 95 percent prediction. I would just like to improve this article as much as I can. Thank you. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Pac-Man PHD: Assessed as B class by ClydeFranklin, though I'm sure you're already aware. Posting this here for record-keeping purposes. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Significant changes to these articles have been made: J. Sai Deepak, India at the 2023 World Athletics Championships, Raid of Ahmednagar (1657), Kingdom of Kaikan, Siege of Ramsej. These articles have not been assessed. I would like these to be assessed, please. Matarisvan (talk) 09:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Matarisvan J. Sai Deepak: Assessed as B class. India at the 2023 World Athletics Championships: Assessed as Start class. Raid of Ahmednagar (1657): Assessed as Start class. Arab conquest of Kaikan: Assessed as Start class. Siege of Ramsej: Assessed as Stub class. I'm surprised so many articles went unrated. I left some feedback in the edit summaries for each, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Thank you, I did not think the assessment would ever get done after looking at the backlog and receiving no response. I'm trying to improve the latter 4 articles to at least C class. I will be using primary sources and details important to history military for the last 3, while for the sports one I'm working on the individual athletes' details as you pointed out. Thanks once again. Matarisvan (talk) 09:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC) I have made significant changes to the articles: Tachlowini Gabriyesos and Dominic Lokinyomo Lobalu. I would like an assessment of them, please.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ViveLaSuisse (talk • contribs) 10:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @ViveLaSuisse: Both articles assessed as C class. I left some feedback in the edit summaries for each, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:28, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Jonathan Allen (journalist). I made several changes to the article (such as adding images and rewording sentences to make them less redundant) since it was initially assessed.Pac-Man PHD (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)  Done - Upgraded from class Start to class C. See article's Talk for assessment details. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 15:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of2023 MTV Video Music Awards. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 [ᴛᴀʟᴋ] 12:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Vestrian24Bio: Assessed as B-class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for Moshe Sanbar. It has been unassessed since 2007 and no longer a stub. Thank you. Wierzba (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)  Done @Wierzba: Assessed as B-class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC) @Pear1020, thank you for your time. I will look into expanding them in the near future.Wierzba (talk) 20:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC) ➡ Requests from August 2023: ⬇ 🔵 14 of 14 requests done: 100% complete Requesting an assessment of Martian dust devils which has been recently revised. MacArthur44 (talk) 01:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as C-class. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 00:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC) I have made lots of edits to Giambattista Busi and I'd like to have it assessed. GarethBaloney (talk) 19:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)  Done @GarethBaloney: Assessed as Start class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC) I made substantial edits to Axon terminal and would be grateful for a reassessment. Millencolin (talk) 10:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)  Done - Assessment remains Class Start, needing a few improvements for upgrade to Class C level. See article's Talk for details. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Alfred Saunders. --TheSwamphen (talk) 01:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as Start-class. TheBritinator (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC) Requesting a reassessment of Josef Hoop. -- TheBritinator (talk) 00:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC)  Done @TheBritinator: Reassessed as B class with failed GA nomination status, though I'm sure you're already aware. Posting this here for record-keeping purposes. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Sumazau. Previously unassessed. dyneowo? 20:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as Start-class. BorgQueen (talk) 23:48, 18 August 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Adhila Nasarin v. State Commissioner of Police. I have recently expanded this stub, I don't think it is a stub anymore.Wiki6995 (talk) 23:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as C-class. BorgQueen (talk) 14:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Sreeja S v. Commissioner of Police. I have recently expanded this stub, I don't think it is a stub anymore. Wiki6995 (talk) 23:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as C-class. BorgQueen (talk) 14:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Chinmayee Jena v. State of Odisha. I have recently expanded this stub, I don't think it is a stub anymore. Wiki6995 (talk) 23:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as C-class. BorgQueen (talk) 14:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of 2023 Premier Lacrosse League Season. I've recently done a string of improvements to the article that I think puts it at C-class. It's difficult for me to assess the article myself as I've never assessed an article before and the leagues size makes it difficult to compare to similar articles like that of the NFL. I plan to continue revising the article but I would like to know where it currently stands. Thank you. Jsfxmn(talk) 4:28, 5 August 2023 UTC  Done @Jsfxmn: Assessed as C class. I left some feedback in the edit summary, if you would like me to further elaborate feel free to ask. Pear 2.0 (say hi!) 17:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of Smallhythe Place after a campaign of improvements. I think it's B-class, but having never self-assessed before I'd appreciate an expert opinion. Thank you.Isaksenk (talk) 18:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)  Done @Isaksenk: sorry for the long wait :) I only fixed a couple style issues and upped the rating to B-class, good job! Broc (talk) 15:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Amazing, thanks @Broc for the guidance! Isaksenk (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment of the page The Rebellion (MLS supporters association). I based it on the other pages for Major League Soccer fan clubs but I'm not entirely sure where it stands and would like someone else's opinion. Thank you! User talk:EmperorQuingus 04:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as Start. @EmperorQuingus Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Obturator hernia my group has made substantial edits to the page, including citations of systematic reviews that are relevant to date and would like to be reassessed for a C-Class or B-class article. Thank you. User: immanueltjahjadi (talk) 11:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)  Already done by CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath, who assessed as C. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC) The Supremes discography I've made substantial changes to this over the past few years and believe it's no longer "start class". Eventually aiming for GA-Class/FL-Class and would greatly appreciate any suggestions to get it to that standard. Many thanks JonathanLGardner (talk) 02:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)  Done assessed as B. @JonathanLGardner Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC) ➡ Requests from July 2023: ⬇ 🔵 7 of 7 requests done: 100% complete HIV disease–related drug reaction is in the process of being revised and should be considered for a reassessment. W.Wu UCSFPharm (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)  Done - @W.Wu UCSFPharm]], article should easily upgrade to B-Class. For now, on the article Talk, I added the B-class article checklist to begin the review. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Tilaka requesting a reassessment from it's current rating as a start class article. Some clean up and copyediting was done to the article. Chilicave (talk)  Done - @Chilicave, The article had a mixed-class of C and Start so I updated to C-class for all WP. In addition on article Talk, I added the B-class article checklist to begin the review. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Romeo's Daughter (album) I have worked on this article and believe it's no longer a stub – presumably now a C-Class article? Skyrack95 (talk) 12:14, 18 July 2023 (UTC)  Done BorgQueen (talk) 12:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Jamie Muscato I've expanded upon the article and made revisions. I would like to see if it would still remain in C-Class standards. Arsoniel (talk) 13:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)  Done - @Arsoniel - See the article's Talk for improvement details. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Surinder Singh Sodhi It has not been assessed yet, but I feel it is A worthy. I have been suggested to take it here per another editor on the talk page. CanadianSingh1469 (talk) 06:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)  Done - @CanadianSingh1469, for now, I gave a C-class initial assessment. The Rater assessment tool predicts 90-percent as B-Class article. On article's Talk, I added the "B-class review" checklist to start that evaluation. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 12:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting reassessment for 1990 Mindanao crisis. I lately added content so that it would stop looking like a stub. Borgenland (talk) 04:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC) Borgenland, the Rater assessment tool predicts this as B-Class article. On article's Talk, I added the "B-class review" checklist to start that discussion. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 19:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)  Already done marked as B.Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Ed Bodin, in the time since it was last accessed the article has heavily increased in quality. DvcDeBlvngis (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as Start-class, rather than C-class as a lot of information about his life is not covered/known. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC) ➡ Requests from June 2023: ⬇ 🔵 7 of 7 requests done: 100% complete Requesting an assessment for New York City Police Department Strategic Response Group; I just rewrote the article from scratch - it has been unassessed since its creation in 2015 and was almost devoid of RS. Thank you! Best, TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 17:15, 29 June 2023 (UTC)TheTranarchist  Done - @TheTranarchist, the Rater assessment tool predicts the article as B-Class or higher, so for now rated as C-Class; and recommend article be submitted for B-Class article review. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 19:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting an assessment for NCERT textbook controversies, edited it long back and was a fresh new article back then but has since then expanded quite a bit. Thanks a lot! Justlookingforthemoment (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)  Done - Article remains Class-Start, mainly because of "Overly detailed" tag that I added, and the "factual accuracy" and " neutrality" tags. @Justlookingforthemoment, with updates to resolve these issues the article can be C-Class. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment of Deep diving. Expanded and referenced. Was assessed C-class in September 2009. Alfie↑↓© 12:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)  Not done @Alfie66: there are too many sourcing issues, including a section completely unreferenced. I would suggest you to focus on those rather than further expansion, as the content is there. Once the issues are solved, the article could be upped to B-class. Broc (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC) @Alfie66:, the B-Class review from 30 November 2016‎ mentions the unsourced section (Dealing with depth). Possibly find a published instruction book/manual to cite, or remove that content. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 16:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Requesting a first assessment for Homosexuality and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Thank you! Pastelitodepapa (talk) 05:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)  Already done as it appears to already be assessed as B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Pastelitodepapa, is this assessment still pending? Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC) It is it seems. I haven't seen an updated rating on the page in the last 10 months the request has been up. Thank you! Pastelitodepapa (talk) 19:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC) I've expanded the plot summary and intro for The Last Time I Lied. Like the novel above it, it has yet to be assessed.Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 01:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)  Done Reassessed as C Class by Nick Moyes. Posting this for record-keeping. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC) I've added a full plot summary to The House Across the Lake (novel) and I'm submitting it for its first assessment. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 04:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as C-class Nick Moyes (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC) I am requesting a review of sections 2-7 of Chinese Legalism. I am not requesting a review of sections beyond this, as I have not much worked on and reviewed the sections beyond this, they are older. I am only requesting a review of the writing, concept, the content, the organization. As to the sourcing, the sourcing should be there, but my sources have become disjointed in places with rewriting, I am working on reconfirming and properly organizing them, which can be seen in some places. And I would of course have to introduce additional source content.FourLights (talk) 16:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)  Done Upgraded assessment from C to B. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC) Assessment requested by FourLights, and article history shows considerable updates. JoeNMLC (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC) I do not specifically require one unless you only wish to review small content. The article is under construction. I have not worked as much last week, I am under the weather. I must gradually make a complete review of the concept of wuwei.FourLights (talk) 19:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC) ➡ Requests from May 2023: ⬇ 🔵 4 of 4 requests done: 100% complete Prunus salicina Revised significantly, and expanded on; no longer start-class, maybe B or C class. Would appreciate assessment or feedback. --Kai Retter (talk) 22:58, 21 May 2023 (UTC) ​ Done Assessed as C-class. Recommend copyediting (e.g. WP:GOCE) for further improvement. Vaticidalprophet 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Thank you for the assessment! Is there any specific copyediting you'd recommend? Kai Retter (talk) 13:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Barnaparichay Revised by adding multiple sections and probably no longer "stub". User:Prinaki•talk)1:47, 17 May 2023 ​ Done Assessed as C-class. Needs inline (rather than general) citations and copyediting. Vaticidalprophet 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC) I've put a lot of content in multi-agent reinforcement learning and I'd like you to re-assess it please. cool-RR (talk) 16:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC)  Done now C-class and feedback given at Talk:Multi-agent reinforcement learning. — Bilorv (talk) 13:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC) Abd Al Aziz Awda Revised significantly in April 2023; probably no longer "start class" (has been listed as such since 2006-7). Eithersummer (talk) 20:15, 8 May 2023 ​ Done Assessed as B-class. Vaticidalprophet 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC) ➡ Requests from April 2023: ⬇ 🔵 10 of 10 requests done: 100% complete Assessment requested for Pusheen. Several users (including myself) have made cleanup edits and slight expansions to the article over the past several months. I just noticed that the article is still showing up as a Stub. Top5a (talk) 23:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)  Done already, it looks like User:Ipigott assessed the article a few months back bumping it from stub to C class. It's definitely well past a stub. Thanks for improving the article Top5a! C class seems appropriate. Several sentences are not cited (B-class criteria 1), and the article is not quite at Criteria 2 for coverage. See The Yellow Kid for an example of types of coverage going beyond the popularity and merchandising. Good luck, Rjjiii (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for 1984 New York City Subway shooting, which was recently promoted to GA status.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 21:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)  Done GA status is the current assessment and seems correct. FA status requires an FA review. One issue to be addressed before an FA review or project-specific A-class review, is that the article uses a great number of duplicated citations and sometimes includes lower quality sources like Fox News when the higher qualities sources in the same grouping of 2-5 citations likely cover the material. Rjjiii (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC) Both Harmony (operating system) and Thoth (operating system) were created about three years ago, and haven't been assessed yet. I would appreciate someone taking a look at either, or both.Kumboloi (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC) ​ Done Harmony assessed as C-class, Thoth as B-class. I left the default importance ratings -- if they're inaccurate, feel free to fix them. Vaticidalprophet 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Denials of Atrocity Crimes Against Indigenous Nations Thank you. Magonz (talk) 10:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)  Already done - @Magonz - Article was moved on 16 December 2023‎. Upgraded to B-Class (Rater assessment tool) on 22 December 2023‎. See article's Talk History for details. JoeNMLC (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Wind power in Kenya Thank you! 1namesake1 (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)  Done - @1namesake1, Assessed as C-class for now. See article's Talk for details. JoeNMLC (talk) 22:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Thank you! 1namesake1 (talk) 16:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Cashierless store Thank you! 1namesake1 (talk) 21:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as C-class Nick Moyes (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Sports engineering Thank you! 1namesake1 (talk) 21:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)  Done - @1namesake1, At article Talk I added WP Engineering, WP Sports. The Rater assessement tool shows ORES prediction of 73.1% for Class-B. For now, I set at Class-Start level. Anyone else here is welcome to re-evaluate and possibly upgrade. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC) Thank you! 1namesake1 (talk) 16:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting reassessment for stable theory. I think it's at least B class now. JoelleJay (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)  Done on 26 January 2024‎ - @JoelleJay - see article's Talk History for Class-B upgrade details. JoeNMLC (talk) 00:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Eric Harroun I gave this page a glowup, I'd argue it meets Good Article standards imo. The article is pretty complete in terms of info; there's not much more reliable info available on him outside of what's currently included. There's also no copyright-free photos of him, based on some searching. I included several general relevant images Toobigtokale (talk) 03:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC) ​ Done Assessed as B-class. I agree it's pretty close to GA. As he's deceased, you can use a fair use image without worrying about copyright. Vaticidalprophet 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Thanks, didn't know about the deceased fair use thing! toobigtokale (talk) 01:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC) ➡ Requests from March 2023: ⬇ 🔵 2 of 2 requests done: 100% complete Once Upon a Sesame Street Christmas has been significantly improved during the course of an AfD and should be reassessed for a promotion to start-class. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC) ​ Done Assessed as start-class. Vaticidalprophet 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Night in the woods,I am pretty sure it could qualify for at least A-Class Starman2377 (talk) March 9 2023.  Done Assessed by someone else as B-class back in March 2022. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC) ➡ Requests from February 2023: ⬇ 🔵 4 of 4 requests done: 100% complete Requesting reassessment for Nikki Budzinski. This was the version assessed as start-class in May. I think it has improved in quality, perhaps to a C-class, with edits from myself and others, but more importantly it is not low-importance anymore: there are 17 US representatives from Illinois. Heavy Water (talk) 00:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)  Done - @Heavy Water, article remains at Class-Start for now. See article's Talk for assessment for details. JoeNMLC (talk) 21:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Hi there - I am in the process of updating and revising Nursing in Australia and while there is still much to achieve, I feel it is of a higher status than a "start" article. Could someone please have a look, rate, and provide advice. Thanks Adamm (talk • contribs) 01:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessment remains Class Start, needing improvements for upgrade to a Class C level. See article's Talk for details. JoeNMLC (talk) 02:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC) I've updated ASM International (society) significantly in December/early January and would appreciate an assessment/feedback regarding it. (First larger set of changes to an article). Referencer12 (talk) 04:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)  Done Assessed as only just scraping through to merit C-class. Still insufficient content based on independent sources. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Kevin Laland has been expanded and a name change has been documented. Would like to request a new assessment and also seek advice on changing the title of the page. FlybellFly (talk) 16:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC) ​ Done Assesssed as start-class. Vaticidalprophet 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC) ➡ Requests from January 2023: ⬇ 🔵 3 of 3 requests done: 100% complete Robert William Johnstone has been greatly expanded since the last assessment. A new assessment would be appreciated. Papamac (talk) 20:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC) ​ Done Assessed as C-class. Vaticidalprophet 00:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Requesting assessment for Living building material, which is currently unrated. François Robere (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)  Done - @François Robere, added 3 wikiprojects as none on Talk page. Rater assessment tool ORES prediction of Class-B, but went with Class-C for this first go-round. JoeNMLC (talk) 18:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC) Requesting reassessment for Krystyna Kersten following substantial revision. I would say B-class but that might be overly hopeful. Thank you! Kazamzam (talk) 16:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC)  Done - @Kazamzam, upgraded from Stub to Start-class with two CN tags. See article's Talk for assessment details. JoeNMLC (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Requests from 2022

Requests from 2022: ⬇ Requesting assessment for Political editing on Wikipedia. The previously-assessed version was a WP:STUB, and that's no longer the case. With thanks. François Robere (talk) 08:12, 21 October 2022 (UTC)  Already done by a different editor. Assessed as list class. (Article was moved) ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 19:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC) Donald Cline - (Project: Lowest quality high-popularity articles). Article currently unassessed. Added stub tag and expanded article. This article can still be expanded but should now be sufficient to classify. Thanks. Wikijenitor (talk) 19:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)  Done though not by me. According to the talk page, this article has been assessed as B-class. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC) Jenn Colella — extensively revised and expanded. Self-upgraded from 'Start' to 'C' class on March 11th, but with work now substantively complete, would appreciate an objective opinion for the article's current grade. Thank you. ~ OldBeeg (talk) 10:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)  Done @OldBeeg, belated assessment details here at article Talk page. Remain Class-C for now. JoeNMLC (talk) 10:04, 25 October 2023‎ (UTC) The article The Benza was first ranked in 2019 and has been expanded on since then greatly. If someone has time, a reassessment would be appreciated. Thank you!-Craft777 (talk)14:18, 5 January 2022 (UTC)  Done Assessed as C-class. Season plot sections are a bit long, and the "Plot" section was a copyvio which I removed. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 20:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

January 12, 2025

Assessed

• Draft:Soma Kh (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

January 10, 2025

Renamed

• Abraham Weintraub – Wikipedia controversy renamed to Abraham Weintraub–Wikipedia controversy.

Assessed

• Abraham Weintraub–Wikipedia controversy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day 2023 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia holidays (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia reliability (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

January 9, 2025

Reassessed

• Saterland Frisian Wikipedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Wikimedia Portugal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• WP:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/2016 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• WP:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/2017 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia history (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

January 8, 2025

Reassessed

• Doraemon (2014 TV series) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• WP:Press coverage 2023 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• WP:Press coverage of health information (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Tibetan Wikipedia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Venda Wikipedia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia-derived encyclopedias (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day 2010 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day 2012 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day 2013 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day 2019 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day 2020 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day 2021 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia Day 2022 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• WP:Wikipedia Takes America (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Draft:Wikipedia Incident of January 2, 2025 (talk) removed.

January 7, 2025

Renamed

• Draft:Doraemon (2014 TV series) renamed to Doraemon (2014 TV series).

Reassessed

• Threats of violence and suicide on Wikipedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Dominic McDevitt-Parks (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Pages using WikiProject Wikipedia with unknown parameters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• WP:Press coverage 2017 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Redirects from Wikipedia domain names (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Top-importance Wikipedia articles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Websites which use Wikipedia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wiki concepts (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikimedia Foundation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia 10 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia 15 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia 15 events (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia 16 events (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia 17 events (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia 18 events (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Wikipedia incident of December 16, 2024 (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia people (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• WP:Wikipedians/Technical Communicators (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

January 6, 2025

Renamed

• Abraham Weintraub–Wikipedia controversy renamed to Abraham Weintraub – Wikipedia controversy.

Assessed

• Abraham Weintraub – Wikipedia controversy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:MediaWiki:Blockly (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia awards (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)