Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Penfield Homunculus: Difference between revisions
→24 May 2024: - |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
:<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
:<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
What are you doing? Its so ridiculous.. [[User:Mucchia|Mucchia]] ([[User talk:Mucchia|talk]]) 13:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Revision as of 13:12, 24 May 2024
The Penfield Homunculus
The Penfield Homunculus (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Penfield Homunculus/Archive.
22 April 2024
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
Identical edits to what blocked user was doing with their previous sock accounts (registered and IP) Fred Zepelin (talk) 03:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Closing without action as the IP has not edited since April 21. Mz7 (talk) 08:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
24 April 2024
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
Same edits as before, obviously same blocked user Fred Zepelin (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Closing without action as the IP has not edited since April 24. Mz7 (talk) 08:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
06 May 2024
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- A Crocodile in Bed (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Same edits as sockmaster and his previous socks, new account from 1 May Fred Zepelin (talk) 02:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed to El Caganer plus Omphebra (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). 
Blocked and tagged. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 08:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
22 May 2024
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Déu-n'hi-do (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
This sock has the same style of edit summaries/writing as the sockmaster, the same interests (FC Barcelona/Catalonia) and at the FC Barcelona page "Déu-n'hi-do" restored the version of the sockmaster. This sock is one of the user's many during the last 1,5 months (following Pròssia, ONLY-BARCELONA, A Crocodile in Bed, Omphebra, Blow.ofmind78, and possibly many more). This new sock also seems to understand that by making small edits, one can easily rack up the amount needed to edit certain semi-protected articles, such as the FC Barcelona one (achieved by making small edits such as these: [1], [2]). Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 12:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comment: I'm familiar with a couple of the socks of this account, and after perusing the edits, I agree: the behavior is the same. Absolutely a sock of the same person. Fred Zepelin (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). I'm afraid that's the best I can do here. Behavioural evidence needs evaluating and I'll leave that to another admin. --Yamla (talk) 13:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
24 May 2024
– This SPI case is open.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Mucchia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
A relatively new account with the same writing style (very similar edit summaries for example), same interests (e.g., FC Barcelona) as the sockmaster and previous socks. Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 13:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
What are you doing? Its so ridiculous.. Mucchia (talk) 13:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)