User talk:Jtrrs0

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message. If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I am watching it. If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the 'watch' tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist.

Archives (Index)

2020 1 2021 1 2022 1 2023 1 2024 1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Request to allow me to remove a section that is not neutral from an article

Hi. A couple of months ago you left a message on my talk page in which you reverted the changes I made to an article. I made the changes because I thought that the particular section was not neutral. Furthermore the news article it linked to was an opinion piece. The article is very long and needs a cleanup. Therefore I think the section should be removed. It is unnecessary and not neutral. Furthermore it doesn't fit with the articles tone. So kindly allow me to remove it. Thanks Knightknight12345 (talk) 14:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for getting in touch. If you mean the edits you made to Tourism in Pakistan then please discuss them in the Article's Talk page so other interested users can contribute. As far as I can remember the article you wanted to remove seemed relevant to me, but please discuss it on the Talk page. It would be helpful if you could explain why you think it is biased. I don't think it's an opinion piece. It's a Long Read which just means it's a longer investigative piece. Jtrrs0 (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

About the article,think it's not neutral and too sensationalist. Actually, the whole section is. It is too off the tone. It all seems a little extra. Plus the page needs a cleanup and it is too long. What if I remove the whole section(image and influencers). Would it break rules. I am experienced editor now. I have contributed to many articles.Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

When I read it back then the section and the article seemed fine to me. If you disagree, I would prefer if you discussed it in the Article's Talk Page because there may be other editors who are interested and experienced there. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Ok thanks for your time Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

ps. will I have to make a request in the talk page. Will other editors immediately respond to me? Knightknight12345 (talk) 17:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

I do think you should make a request there. It is how we deal with disputed material. People often put pages they are interested in on their watchlist and so editors who are interested will be notified. It is unlikely that they will respond immediately but it should not take too long to get some responses. Jtrrs0 (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the help Knightknight12345 (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

• News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections

• Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?

• Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24

• In the media: Deadnames on the French Wikipedia, and a duel between Russian wikis

• Op-Ed: Wikidata to split as sheer volume of information overloads infrastructure

• Comix: Generations

• Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)