Jump to content

Talk:Individualist anarchism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m top: Fixed/removed unknown WikiProject parameter(s) and general fixes per WP:Talk page layout
top: broken anchor fixed
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Controversial-issues}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Anarchism}}
{{WikiProject Anarchism}}
Line 6: Line 7:
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=mid}}
}}
}}
{{Controversial-issues}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(180d)
| algo = old(180d)
Line 18: Line 17:
}}
}}
{{archives|age=180}}
{{archives|age=180}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>[[past and present anarchist communities#Modern Times (1851 to late 1860s)|Modern Times]]</nowiki> The anchor (Modern Times (1851 to late 1860s)) [[Special:Diff/672926197|has been deleted]]. <!-- {"title":"Modern Times (1851 to late 1860s)","appear":{"revid":46621334,"parentid":46209306,"timestamp":"2006-04-02T18:16:34Z","removed_section_titles":["Albemarle (1640's-1663)","Libertatia (1670's to 1690's)","Utopia (1847 to 1860's)","Modern times (1851 to late 1860's)"],"added_section_titles":["Albemarle (1640s-1663)","Libertatia (1670s to 1690s)","Utopia (1847 to 1860s)","Modern Times (1851 to late 1860s)"],"replaced_anchors":{"Albemarle (1640's-1663)":"Albemarle (1640s-1663)","Libertatia (1670's to 1690's)":"Libertatia (1670s to 1690s)","Utopia (1847 to 1860's)":"Utopia (1847 to 1860s)","Modern times (1851 to late 1860's)":"Modern Times (1851 to late 1860s)"}},"disappear":{"revid":672926197,"parentid":672911858,"timestamp":"2015-07-24T20:26:04Z","removed_section_titles":["Historical examples of societies successfully organized according to anarchist principles","Celtic Ireland (650-1650)","Icelandic Commonwealth (930 to 1262)","An Early Anarchist Community in North Africa","Rhode Island (1636-1648)","Albemarle (1640s-1663)","Holy Experiment (Quaker) Pennsylvania (1681-1690)","Libertatia (1670s to 1690s)","Utopia (1847 to 1860s)","Modern Times (1851 to late 1860s)","Whiteway Colony (1898 to present)","Tolstoyan Agricultural Communes (1921-1937)","The autonomous Shinmin region (1929-1931)","Spanish revolution (1936 to 1939)","Anarchist Catalonia (1936 to 1939)","Israeli Kibbutz Movement","Freetown Christiania","Examples of revolts and uprisings with anarchist qualities","Italian Factory Occupations and Councils","Ukraine and the Makhnovist movement (1918 to 1921)","Hungarian Revolution (1956)","Situationist and Worker/Student Occupation Movement (May, 1968)","Kwangju Uprising (May, 1980)","Polish revolution/Solidarity 1980 to 1982","Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities","Cascadia Free State 1996 (US)","Argentina (2001 to 2002)","Abahlali baseMjondolo Rebellion: South Africa 2005 to Present","Examples of projects and other movements with anarchist qualities","Cooperative businesses","Squatter movements","Laissez Faire City","Free Software movement","Western Sahara Exiles (1976 to Present)","CITEREF2006","CITEREF2002","CITEREF1979","CITEREF2005","CITEREFCoates2001"],"added_section_titles":[]}} -->
}}


== Anarchism Tree Diagram ==
== Anarchism Tree Diagram ==

Revision as of 09:29, 7 June 2024

Anarchism Tree Diagram

Sock, now indeffed. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Anarchism Tree

It helps to have a diagram of the various schools of anarchism. PhilLiberty (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BeŻet, you should discuss things rather than unilaterally deleting my edits. PhilLiberty (talk) 20:56, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilLiberty: Could you please stop vandalizing pages using some diagrams you created. Per WP:BRD, you are making a bold change that warrants discussion. There is a large number of sources indicating that anarcho-capitalism has nothing to do with anarchism, let alone individualist anarchism. If you disagree, discuss this first before engaging in an edit war. BeŻet (talk) 20:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm pretty good at the bold, revert, and discuss cycle. By the definitions given in Wikipedia articles and this article, anarcho-capitalism qualifies as individualist anarchism. This is supported by Benjamin Tucker and Voltairine de Cleyre among others. It is true that a large number of sources, virtually all sectarian anarcho-socialists, that cite the old "true Scotsman" aka dildo fallacy. I would say that this position was refuted long ago in essays like this: http://www.ozarkia.net/bill/anarchism/library/rg-anarcho-cap.html Now I will boldly revert again. PhilLiberty (talk) 21:16, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But that's not true. Benjamin Tucker wasn't even alive when Rothbard came up with his ideology. Stop edit warring, or you will be reported. BeŻet (talk) 21:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is an unreadable mess

I don't even know where to start with this. This article is so absurdly long due to its apparent commitment to throw everything but the kitchen sink in. There is no rhyme or reason to its structure, it just bounces randomly between sub-subjects, individuals and areas even remotely associated with the subject. The sources also appear to be a mix of clearly reliable sources, primary sources and random blog posts from even more random authors. I don't understand how any of this is remotely useful to anyone, whether they be unaffiliated casual readers or dyed-in-the-wool Stirner fans. Does anybody have any idea for how we could improve this article that doesn't involve just blowing it up and starting over? Grnrchst (talk) 11:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I don't see how it's salvagable. WP:TNT it is. czar 14:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]