Talk:Autocracy: Difference between revisions
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Transcluding GA review Tag: Reverted |
asked for a 2nd opinion regarding Autocracy GAN nomination (GANReviewTool) Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color: darkgreen">''Thebiguglyalien''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color: sienna">talk</span>]])</small>|page=3|subtopic=Politics and government|status= |
{{GA nominee|20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color: darkgreen">''Thebiguglyalien''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Thebiguglyalien|<span style="color: sienna">talk</span>]])</small>|page=3|subtopic=Politics and government|status=2ndopinion|note=|shortdesc=Form of government}} |
||
{{FailedGA|14:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)|topic=Politics and government|page=1|oldid=1191652394}} |
{{FailedGA|14:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)|topic=Politics and government|page=1|oldid=1191652394}} |
||
{{Talkheader|archive_age=3|archive_units=years}} |
{{Talkheader|archive_age=3|archive_units=years}} |
Revision as of 01:02, 8 June 2024
Autocracy is currently a Politics and government good article nominee. Nominated by Thebiguglyalien (talk) at 20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC) An editor has reviewed the article, and left comments on the review page. However, this editor has requested a second opinion either from a more experienced reviewer, or someone with more expertise on this subject, to gain further consensus that this article meets the good article criteria. In the meantime, editors are encouraged to revise the article based on the first reviewer's comments. Short description: Form of government |
Autocracy was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 28, 2023, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Autocracy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 years |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Autocracy. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Autocracy at the Reference desk. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Divya Bhatnagar.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmcnichol. Peer reviewers: MoeKasawaki.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Autocracy/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 20:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Kimikel (talk · contribs)
Hello, I'm going to be doing this review as part of the July GA backlog drive. It should take me no longer than a week. 22:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
@Thebiguglyalien:: Overall, I could find very little to be addressed in the article. Please see my suggestions below and consider implementing them when you have a chance. Kimikel (talk) 00:33, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Kimikel, I've made the changes that you suggested. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Thebiguglyalien I read through the article again and could not find anything amiss. Thank you for making this a super easy review, and for quickly implementing my suggestions. I appreciate your work, congratulations on another good article! Kimikel (talk) 23:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Well-written
- Every issue in the past review has been addressed.
Modern era
- "The decline in autocracy across Western Europe..." > This paragraph would make more sense if you flipped the next two sentences, as it starts by saying that it affected other areas of the world, and then says that it was resisted or ineffective.
- In terms of prose, that was the only suggestion I had.
Verifiable
Spot check:
Broad
- Broad in its coverage
Neutral
- No issues with neutrality
Images
- No issues with images
Stable
- Stable, no warring
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees seeking second opinion
- Good article nominees on review
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages