101 Rent Boys: Difference between revisions
Added film date template |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
The interviewees discuss a variety of aspects about the [[Prostitution in the United States|U.S. prostitution trade]] itself such as their individual physical selling-points, attitudes held toward customers, and sexual turn-ons/offs. [[Self-identity]] and [[sexual orientation]] come up, with several of the men being "[[gay for pay]]". Personal life challenges such as [[substance abuse]] and periods of [[homelessness]] are talked about as well.<ref name=Variety/> Several were [[Child sexual abuse|molested as children]]; some men mention feelings of depression and segregation, such as one interviewee describing using drugs "to deal with the fact that" he's "using intimacy as a commodity".<ref name=Reader/> However, others protest the characterization as hurting or being made dirty. Each hustler has a large card that describes the number with which he got assigned during the film-making.<ref name=Variety/> |
The interviewees discuss a variety of aspects about the [[Prostitution in the United States|U.S. prostitution trade]] itself such as their individual physical selling-points, attitudes held toward customers, and sexual turn-ons/offs. [[Self-identity]] and [[sexual orientation]] come up, with several of the men being "[[gay for pay]]". Personal life challenges such as [[substance abuse]] and periods of [[homelessness]] are talked about as well.<ref name=Variety/> Several were [[Child sexual abuse|molested as children]]; some men mention feelings of depression and segregation, such as one interviewee describing using drugs "to deal with the fact that" he's "using intimacy as a commodity".<ref name=Reader/> However, others protest the characterization as hurting or being made dirty. Each hustler has a large card that describes the number with which he got assigned during the film-making.<ref name=Variety/> |
||
Additional examples of subjects broached include a [[Hispanic and Latino Americans|Latino]] rent boy being a former [[gang member]], a performance artist in heavily fetishist regalia operating in the [[BDSM scene]], and a prostitute who is [[transsexual]]. While the outfits worn and states of dress vary from person to person, nudity briefly occurring, the film itself contains no sexual activity.<ref name=Variety/> |
Additional examples of subjects broached include a [[Hispanic and Latino Americans|Latino]] rent boy being a former [[gang member]], [[Draft:Van Darkholme|Van Darkholme]] who is a performance artist dressed in heavily fetishist regalia operating in the [[BDSM scene]], and a prostitute who is [[transsexual]]. While the outfits worn and states of dress vary from person to person, nudity briefly occurring, the film itself contains no sexual activity.<ref name=Variety/> |
||
==Reviews and responses== |
==Reviews and responses== |
Revision as of 17:57, 11 June 2024
101 Rent Boys | |
---|---|
Directed by | Fenton Bailey Randy Barbato |
Produced by | Fenton Bailey Randy Barbato |
Cinematography | Sandra Chandler |
Edited by | William Grayburn |
Distributed by | Strand Releasing[1] |
Release date |
|
Running time | 78 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
101 Rent Boys[2] is a 2000 documentary film that explores the lives of male prostitutes in the Los Angeles, California area. Created by film-makers Randy Barbato and Fenton Bailey, the film depicts 101 hustlers, being paid each $50 for their time, which come from diverse ethnic, regional, and economic backgrounds.[3] Picked up on and around Santa Monica Boulevard,[4] the men discuss a variety of things, many referring to their personal history as well commenting on the nature of their work.[3]
Background and film contents
Filmmakers Randy Barbato and Fenton Bailey had earlier created the independent films The Eyes of Tammy Faye and Party Monster. While the two previous films covered different topics, the cinematography and general style are the same as in 101 Rent Boys. Each man interviewed is paid $50 for his time,[3] and they were picked up on and around Santa Monica Boulevard.[4]
The interviewees discuss a variety of aspects about the U.S. prostitution trade itself such as their individual physical selling-points, attitudes held toward customers, and sexual turn-ons/offs. Self-identity and sexual orientation come up, with several of the men being "gay for pay". Personal life challenges such as substance abuse and periods of homelessness are talked about as well.[3] Several were molested as children; some men mention feelings of depression and segregation, such as one interviewee describing using drugs "to deal with the fact that" he's "using intimacy as a commodity".[5] However, others protest the characterization as hurting or being made dirty. Each hustler has a large card that describes the number with which he got assigned during the film-making.[3]
Additional examples of subjects broached include a Latino rent boy being a former gang member, Van Darkholme who is a performance artist dressed in heavily fetishist regalia operating in the BDSM scene, and a prostitute who is transsexual. While the outfits worn and states of dress vary from person to person, nudity briefly occurring, the film itself contains no sexual activity.[3]
Reviews and responses
Variety ran a mixed review by film critic Dennis Harvey, who argued that the men interviewed "are there more to be tallied than truly fathomed." He stated that the film's creators "deliver a slick, fussily stylized package that leaves no room for boredom" but should have delved more into the lives of the interviewees, with fewer hustlers being involved. However, Harvey considered several moments rather "memorable", citing for example a prostitute's description of a parent dying of a heroin overdose that went into detail about "feeling my soul float away" as a result.[3]
A brief mentioning of the film by the Chicago Reader described it as "gritty" and remarked on the frankness of the comments made by the hustlers.[5] The film has received condemnation in the pages of the Encyclopedia of Prostitution and Sex Work, with 101 Rent Boys labeled in the book's first volume as being "an exploitative look" at the subject rather than an honest one. The book asserted that the overall style of the film gets set up in such a way as to "reduce the men to parodies". The works Chicken Ranch (1983) and Fetishes (1996) were highlighted as a contrast.[4]
Releases
The film came out on the broadcast network Cinemax in August 2000.[3]
101 Rent Boys was released on Region 1 DVD on June 26, 2001.[6] The DVD release has a feature where each of the interview subjects were left alone with the camera for five minutes to do whatever they choose. In this feature, several participants masturbate.[7]
A companion book, also called 101 Rent Boys, was released, featuring photos and excerpts from the interviews.[citation needed]
See also
References
- ^ "Home Page". Strand Releasing. Retrieved March 2, 2021.
- ^ "101 Rent Boys". IMDB. Retrieved March 2, 2021.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Harvey, Dennis (July 17, 2000). "Review: '101 Rent Boys'". Variety. Retrieved September 7, 2015.
- ^ a b c Melissa Hope Ditmore, ed. (January 2006). Encyclopedia of Prostitution and Sex Work, Volume 1. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 164. ISBN 9780313329692.
- ^ a b Camper, Fred. "101 Rent Boys". Chicago Reader. Retrieved September 7, 2015.
- ^ "101 Rent Boys Uncut". hive4media.com. Archived from the original on July 8, 2001. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
- ^ 101 Rent Boys: Uncut. OCLC 51110135. Retrieved March 2, 2021.
External links
- 2000 films
- 2000 documentary films
- 2000 LGBT-related films
- Documentary films about male prostitution
- 2000s English-language films
- West Hollywood, California
- Documentary films about Los Angeles
- Gay-related films
- Documentary films about prostitution in the United States
- 2000s American films
- American LGBT-related documentary films
- English-language documentary films