User talk:Hydnjo: Difference between revisions
Re: User:SPUI |
Greedyredbag (talk | contribs) I completely agree... |
||
Line 267: | Line 267: | ||
Hi Hydnjo, I noticed your comment on [[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]]'s page and thought I'd drop you a line. One, it looks like you inserted your comment in the middle of [[User:Kevin Rector|Kevin Rector]]'s comments. In general, it's best to add your section at the bottom of the page. While occasionally it makes sense to respond to individual sentences or paragraphs of a comment, it's probably better not to insert a new section heading with in it. I hope you don't mind if I rearrange the sections to restore his comment. Regarding [[User:SPUI]], I think that's unlikely. He has a quirky sense of humor, and added that himself (you'll also notice that he's listed himself as a suspected sockpupper of Jesus and of SPUI/jajaja). Actually, "SPUI" stands for "[[Single Point Urban Interchange]]"—SPUI is interested in roads and transportation, as you'll no doubt notice from his userpage. Sorry for eavesdropping, and hope this helps. — [[User:Knowledge Seeker|Knowledge Seeker]] [[User talk:Knowledge Seeker|দ]] 02:36, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
Hi Hydnjo, I noticed your comment on [[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]]'s page and thought I'd drop you a line. One, it looks like you inserted your comment in the middle of [[User:Kevin Rector|Kevin Rector]]'s comments. In general, it's best to add your section at the bottom of the page. While occasionally it makes sense to respond to individual sentences or paragraphs of a comment, it's probably better not to insert a new section heading with in it. I hope you don't mind if I rearrange the sections to restore his comment. Regarding [[User:SPUI]], I think that's unlikely. He has a quirky sense of humor, and added that himself (you'll also notice that he's listed himself as a suspected sockpupper of Jesus and of SPUI/jajaja). Actually, "SPUI" stands for "[[Single Point Urban Interchange]]"—SPUI is interested in roads and transportation, as you'll no doubt notice from his userpage. Sorry for eavesdropping, and hope this helps. — [[User:Knowledge Seeker|Knowledge Seeker]] [[User talk:Knowledge Seeker|দ]] 02:36, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
== I completely agree... == |
|||
I agree with your comment (thanx for it), and that rule is quite breakable, and maybe arbitrary... |
|||
let's prepare a good argument for that rule, |
|||
thanx for the google link :) |
|||
--[[User:Greedyredbag|Greedyredbag]] 03:44, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:44, 14 April 2005
This is the place to talk, explain, complain, or flame.
Welcome!
Hi Hydnjo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Flockmeal 21:41, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
How to make a Template:.... tag.
How do I make a double brace tag such as {{inuse}} and is there a list of already existing ones?
- That's called a template. If you wanted to make {{blah}}, then you would go to template:blah and put the content there. →Raul654 21:38, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Oh, and yes, there is a BIIIIIG list somewhere but I can't remember where it is off the top of my head. →Raul654 21:39, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
- You're probably thinking either of Wikipedia:All pages in the MediaWiki and Template namespace or Wikipedia:Template messages/All. --David Iberri | Talk 22:04, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Check out m:Help:Template for more details on setting up templates. --David Iberri | Talk 22:04, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
Templates
You're very welcome. Since I'm here, welcome to Wikipedia! :-) Happy editing. --David Iberri | Talk 03:46, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
JPG Help
I can't seem to make [[Image:Hydnjo.JPG]] thumbnail sized. I've uploaded it as a 2KB file but it still comes out BIG. Feel free to edit or explain so that I can edit. Also how can I reference that image without displaying it. I used "nowiki" for that image reference in this message but that requires some helpful soul to type it out rather than clicking on it. Thanks, User talk:Hydnjo
- (From Hydnjo): Experimenting around it seems that my original upload needs a "syop" to delete. Sorry about that, I'll be more careful in the future. Would a "syop" please help. Delete everything if you wish and I'll start over. Thanks Hydnjo 02:55, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC) User talk:Hydnjo
- Firstly, you can display a reference to an image by including a colon at the beginning of the wiki-brackets, like this: [[:Image:Hydnjo.JPG]] , which displays this: Image:Hydnjo.JPG. Secondly, it's okay to upload big (within reason), because you can use the Wikipedia:Extended image syntax to display a smaller version, but still have the large version available for users who want to see more detail. Thirdly, you can modify an uploaded image by uploading a modified copy with exactly the same file name -- you will be given the option to overwrite the original image. See also Wikipedia:Picture tutorial for more info and links. Best of luck to you! [[User:CatherineMunro|Catherine\talk]] 06:54, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for JPG help
Hello Catherine and thank you for your fast response to my plea for help.
- The colon after "[[" is exactly what I was looking for.
- My confusion about reloading an image may be the result of the way my browser (Safari) works. I had reloaded Image:Hydnjo.JPG several times (take a peek at that page's history) but the initial BIG image kept showing up no matter which revision I called up. I tried logging out and into WP and emptying Safari's cache but to no avail. But,when I went back there after reading your response this morning the image was thumbnail size (how did you do that)! So today (as an experiment) I replaced that image with it's horizontal reverse (Heidi-left, Joe-right). Same thing happened (twice); the old image kept showing up. In desperation I restarted my computer and then all was fine. Question - does WP have a time delay when images are replaced or is my iMac browser ignoring my request to empty it's cache?
- Thanks for the "Picture tutorial" link - more stuff to learn.
- Your User and Talk pages will keep me up way past my bedtime tonight.
- Is your self-reference (I had to look it up in WP) an MBTI category?
- Without asking your permission, I ripped off your signature format. Thanks again,[[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 23:25, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- No problem, Joe, we're glad to help. We all had to find our way through the thicket of help and policy pages at some point -- knowing you'll do the same for somebody else down the road is all the thanks we need.
- The caching problem is probably on our end. Because the vast majority of our users are readers rather than editors, and every reader can be served the same page every time until the page changes, we lighten the load on our servers by using a layer of "Squid servers". The page request goes first to the Squid, which, if nothing has changed since the last cache, sends a cached copy of page to readers -- that is, non-logged in users -- without touching the main databases. When you're logged in, it's not supposed to send you a cached page, but sometimes it does, especially if there's a lot of traffic at the moment, or a lot of changes have been made to a page within a short time.
- In addition, if the Squids pass on the request to the main servers, there's a "round robin DNS" system which finds the machine with the lightest load at that millisecond, and sends your request there. MOST of the time, this is totally transparent, and MOST of the time, all of the physical servers are exactly in synch. When you run into a caching issue, though, it may be that traffic is high and either the Squids or the database servers are slightly behind in updating, or are serving a cached page instead of the latest update. It never takes long to catch up, and usually a user would never notice, but it is frustrating when you are trying to check that an improvement you made looks the way you want it to. (It's all very complicated, and I applaud our volunteer developers for making it work as well as it does!)
- Yes, the INFP is one of the MBTI categories -- only 1.5% of the population out there, or something. :) (Hope you enjoyed your stroll through my user pages...) And no worries on the signature, I borrowed it from Solitude, and posted the code for it on my page to make it easy to borrow. Please feel free to ask if there's anything else I can do to help. [[User:CatherineMunro|Catherine\talk]] 20:00, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hello again Catherine
- Thanks for the server tutorial. I suspected as much after a few more experiments; I seemed to have no control over the timing of the new upload actually showing up. I was confused at first because of a few coincidental occurrences. Your explanation fits my experiences.
- I noted your acknowledgement to Solitude after sending my comments. Thanks anyway.
- Also, there are about three times more of you INFPs out there than you think according to an excellent reference resource. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 00:16, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Heroic Admins (or whomever)
Hi Jimbo,
- I'm fairly new around here and my wife is already complaining about your project. As I poke around and try to feel the edges, I am utterly impressed with the way I have been welcomed and helped (a beautiful personal touch) and, in particular, the devotion of the Admins (or Syops) that are so amazingly vigilant at identifying, reverting, and blocking those individuals who feel a need to soil anything that is unsoiled or helpful.
- I hope to become more of a contributing member of this community (wife permitting) as I feel more comfortable with all of the "customaries".
- My congratulations for such an wonderful project and contribution to our world.
[[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 01:32, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
You're welcome
Hydnjo - I saw your message on Jimbo's talk page, and (I'm going to be a bit impertinent here) speaking for the rest of the admins, I'd like to say you're welcome. Also, if you have any questions, feel free to ask in private on my talk page, or on the help desk. →Raul654 02:23, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
Special Thanks To ... (from Hydnjo)
- Flockmeal for your kind welcome. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 03:48, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- →Raul654 for your help with templates. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 03:48, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- David Iberri for your help in finding THE template list. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 03:48, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Catherine for your help with uploading images and making my signature look like I know what I'm doing. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 03:48, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- and →Raul|654 (again) for watchlisting HIS talk page and taking the time to respond. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 03:48, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Tip about thumbnails
Hi, I noticed you were experimenting with different sized versions of your photo. It appears that the last version of your photo was manually resized to be thumbnail sized.
If you haven't tried it out yet, there is a thumbnail feature for JPEGs that allows you to keep a large picture linked to a smaller preview version that shows up on the page when you first view it.
For example, the example thumbnail to the right links to a larger version of a photo of my wife and I on vacation.
If you're really curious, there is a picture tutorial with a mind-boggling number of options on this page, and another with fewer choices on this page.
Cheers,
— DV 03:58, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Thanks DV
I'm new and old (how's that for an oximoron) and I appreciate all the help that I'm getting from you folks. The he links that you provided were especially helpful. I hope that at some future time I'll be able to do the same for another newbie. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 04:56, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
loading image and cache problem
I saw above your problem with reloading image and seeing the old version, you can work around this by forcing a reload in your browser (shift reload for safari I think) phe 05:07, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
No - Not That
phe : I reloaded an upside-down copy (see Image:Hydnjo.JPG) but it still shows the earlier (right-side-up) image even after doing your reload suggestion. I even restarted my computer which closes all apps and restarts them. Something strange here - I'll let you know if I ever figure it out.
- Well look at that, in the time that it took to type this message to you, the image flipped upside-down. Strange - some kind of time delay to work through the system (I think).
- I'm going to make it right-side-up now. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 05:51, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Ignore the above. The image is either right-side-up or upside-down at some whim that I don't about yet. I'll let you know when I find out. [[User:Hydnjo| Hydnjo\talk]] 06:02, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Help desk
No problem. I just saw your question on Special:Recent changes; if I hadn't, somebody else would have answered. Keep up the good work. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 02:37, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)
Note to Cyrius
Thanks again
You're fast with Wikipedia:Help desk. I appreciate it but I don't know how you do it. So, are you watching us or what? I've tried watching "Recent changes" so I know that's not how we get flagged, it's just too damn cluttered. An interested newcomer:hydnjo talk 03:50, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Alphabetizing
Alas, I did it the old fashioned way; if there is a Wiki-magic way to do it I couldn't find it. I'd guide you to other places to seek answers but it seems like you know them all already. :-) Sorry I wasn't much help! Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 03:52, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Heh. When I want to do something productive but I don't feel like writing anything, I find random things to tidy up – and I know I'm not the only one who does this. On the whole Wikipedia is much less messy than you might expect! Actually, I was there adding a link anyway, so I figured I might as well. Happy editing! Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 04:31, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Searles Castle reply
Hello! Thanks for getting back to me on that Searles Castle issue. Occasionally, folks will start in on an article and realize the title is wrong. They blank the page and hope for a speedy deletion to come along, which is what I had assumed had happened in your case. The new article is just flat out wonderful and I encourage you to contribute more like it. Welcome to the wacky wiki!! Please give a yell on my talk page if you have any other questions. - Lucky 6.9 19:48, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- (Re: minor tweaks) You're welcome. Thank you for the article. It caught my eye while I was patrolling Recent Changes. Anything with the word "castle" is guaranteed to grab my attention. :-) I'm looking forward to seeing the pictures when they become available. Happy editing! SWAdair | Talk 04:00, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Deletion abbreviations
Greetings. OB stands for "obsolete", meaning there exists a better image to use instead. OR stands for "orphan", meaning the image isn't used. CV stands for copyright violation. We use these abbreviations on IFD. I figured in might confuse people to see these in the log, but it's a lot easier than writing the whole thing out, and I'm lazy. :) – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 13:45, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
WP Hierarchy
- Your joking, right? How about Jimbo, the wikimedia board, the developers, Bureaucrats, the arbitration commitee, the mediation commitee, admins, users, new users, anons, known sockpuppets and trolls, and hard banned users.... doesn't that sound like a clear hierarchy to you? Also this ignores completely the general guideline to avoid self references when possible, on top of the POV and factual inaccuracy. Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 08:24, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Please see User_talk:Sam_Spade#Wikipedia_Hierarchy_Copy. Where was the above from, btw? I seem to have forgotten. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 00:05, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Message left on Sam Spade's talk page:
- I was just poking around and following some controvertial stuff when I came across either Mgm or Netoholic (I forget which) trying to get you to stop using a template for your signature. I was interested because I wanted to understand their's and your position so that I would do the proper thing myself. Anyway, as I was looking at your talk page I noticed your commentary about the Wiki heirarchy, a well thought out description I thought, so I copied it to my talk page for my own reference. I hope you don't mind but if you do, I'll get rid of it. hydnjo talk 01:47, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Message left on Sam Spade's talk page:
- My reply is @ User_talk:Sam_Spade#Wikipedia_Hierarchy_Copy. Cheers, (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 08:18, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This picture is the best I've been able to get so far (other better pics are too comercial). When the snow melts and the green comes back I'll go up and take some pictures myself (I live nearby). Also I'm trying to find more editorial material. hydnjo talk 23:45, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- :-)That's a wonderful picture. Thank you for remembering me, and please do remember me again when you get more pics. User talk:SWAdair
Hi,
Unfortunately, Wikipedia can't use content that's been copied from other websites - it's important to respect the author's copyright. In the future please don't copy other sites into Wikipedia articles, without the author's permission. Thanks. Rhobite 05:21, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm sorry about the mistake on my part. I was researching and by mistake I loaded a research article into the Wiki article. I wish there was a quick way to un-do the error with a keystroke or two but it seems that it nees to go through the VFD process Hopefully speedy. I guess this will make me more careful in the future ;-) hydnjo talk 06:01, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- It's no problem at all, undoing things is pretty easy around here. Happy editing. Rhobite 06:13, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
Eh, it was just a trivial edit, really. Still, it's good to have a message on my talk page that doesn't require me to go justify my actions to somebody. It has gotten to the point lately where I cringe when I see the big yellow new messages box. -- Cyrius|✎ 04:07, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
de-stubbing
Hi Hyjno - you wrote Thank you for "de-stubbing" this article. Just curious though - how did you find (locate) it?
- I only "de-stubbed" it inasmuch as I took the stub template off it - someone else did the hard work of writing. As to where I found it, I'm part of the stub-sorting WikiProject (WP:WSS), and I found it while doing a sweep of Category:Stub. Grutness|hello? 02:01, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
hewlett packard
I added the based-in subject category due to Oregon having the base facilities for HP Printer operations and research. If this is in error, I will need to reconsider another other article I minorly edited. Tygar 18:14, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
- After reviewing HP site, looks like I was in error with this category assignment. Sorry. Tygar 18:43, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
Two votes at Million pool
I noticed you made two votes (July 23 and 31) at Wikipedia:Million pool. Did you change your vote, but forget to delete the old one? —Mar·ka·ci:2005-03-10 02:42 Z
- Oops, you're right. I'll delete my 31 July 2006 entry as it is your birthday. Good luck, hydnjo talk 04:01, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Danke
Hey, thanks for the fix on my user page. Mr. Billion 03:05, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
When I made it, I didn't realize there was no Interstate 291 article. --SPUI (talk) 02:21, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Yes, of course they're linked. Because they're valid redirects, EXCEPT that there is no article at the target. What part of that don't you understand? --SPUI (talk) 02:38, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Kein Gluck
Nein, nichts gefunden auf [[1]] . None of those seem to refer to any kind of partisan or armed resistence in .de after the german capitulation. I also looked on 1945 and 1946 (the year articles) in german, also no mention there. :-/ Thanks for your suggestion though! :-) Kim Bruning 13:25, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Heidi question
Hi! Thanks for getting back to me. Generally, single-sentence articles are speedy deletion candidates since they lack content. A short article is great, but there has to be more to it since this is a reference work. You can add things like the movie's year of release, its costars, differences between the movie and the original story or perhaps any odd stories related to the production. If I remember right, that's the same movie that NBC cut to back in 1968 before the end of an AFC football game since they thought the game was hopelessly over and went to the movie. Turns out the Raiders came from behind in the final few seconds to win. Tell ya what: I'll remove the speedy tag and let you have at it. Best, - Lucky 6.9 22:39, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oops...wrong Heidi. The one in '68 was made for TV. I see now that an anon wrote the article (such as it is). Something like that can usually be tagged as a speedy without any problem. - Lucky 6.9 22:44, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- LOL! Yeah, I noticed the "Heidi connection!" Too funny. Have a great weekend and hope you're still having fun here. - Lucky 6.9 21:38, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, this is becoming fun. Folks like you make editing here worthwhile. The screen name comes from my rather fortunate acquisition of a Mercedes-Benz 450SEL 6.9 for all of $99 just before discovering Wikipedia. Way I figured, it was a "lucky" break, but not quite a "lucky seven." So, the fractional "Lucky 6.9" was born. Car still needs work, but what a blast it is to drive! - Lucky 6.9 01:11, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, that "6.9" has raised an eyebrow or two in the past...hope you liked the article! The car's only badge is, in fact "6.9." There aren't any "450SEL" badges on it at all. Even the promo literature called it just "6.9." I owe you a ride! - Lucky 6.9 01:37, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Re: 666,666th pool
No, because 666,667 isn't as cool as 666,666 :) User:Luigi30 (ΛυηγηΛ) 01:17, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Fan club
Cool, you are the first member of my fan club I have decided to set up. And don't bother talking to Onefool, he's a drunken offspring (he's my outlet for editting under the influence). You made me laugh when I was spying on my son. thanks Bashfool!--Wonderfool (talk) (contribs) (email) 11:11, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I'm a bit confused as to what's going on there. If you happen to know more, please let me know, but I'll unblock it in the meantime just to be safe. Best, SlimVirgin 22:12, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
Nothing goes unnoticed ;-) and that's good to see!
You caught me between edits, I'm currently in the process of editing the old Marking out page to cover the more traditional usage. The delay is in part due to me attempting to tidy up any remaining wiki links to the original page's contents. It's unlikely I'll be revisiting the pro wrestling area so I figured I'd spend a bit of extra time on catching any mistakes I made. Thanks -- Graibeard 02:12, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Hound's Tooth
Hi! That article now looks more like a real substub than a vandal bot listing. At first, it just looked like more auto-generated booshwah from goodness-knows-where. I may take a stab at expansion m'self. Thanks for the heads-up and remember that you can fix anything that has a speedy tag on it. Have a great weekend! - Lucky 6.9 23:17, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- It's such an incredibly minor bit of canonical fluff that I don't really know what could be added to this that isn't already at the link. I really dig "Star Wars," but I'd never heard of this bounty hunter nor this ship until now. - Lucky 6.9 05:02, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
I noticed you nominated Nomad zen for speedy deletion due to its being advertising. Just thought I'd let you know, advertisement is not a criteria for speedy deletion. See wp:csd. We try to be strict about these sort of things. Thanks and keep contributing, Meelar (talk) 01:14, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Posted on Meelar's talk page:
- Point taken, thanks. hydnjo talk 01:25, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Toronto roads
Please stop moving Toronto streets, many of them do not require disambiguation. - SimonP 05:05, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
- I have posted the following on SimonP's talk page:
- I'm not subtracting information am I? I just noticed that some of your street names were familiar to me, but not in Toronto. Anyone who looks up the un-ambiguated street name will go directly to the Toronto street article unless there is another street with the same name at which time they will have the opportunity to choose which street they intended. Do you have a problem with that? If so, please explain because I'm trying to avoid confusion and not create conflict. hydnjo talk 05:53, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Moving them does nothing to solve this problem as the reader will still be redirected to the Toronto street, but now at a more ugly and cumbersome name. Unless disambiguation pages are created at the more generic name moving helps no one. Moreover the vast majority of the pages you moved will never even need to be disambiguated as in most cases Toronto is the only city in the world with a street by that name notable enough to have an article. - SimonP 06:15, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
- OK then lets rv the changes and only disambig as necessary. I can't help tonight but will get on with it as time permits. Sorry for any inconvience. hydnjo talk 06:51, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I have gone trhough them. There are a few that certainly needed to be disambiged, e.g. College Street, University Avenue, and Queen Street. Others I restored to their original titles. - SimonP 14:57, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
- OK then lets rv the changes and only disambig as necessary. I can't help tonight but will get on with it as time permits. Sorry for any inconvience. hydnjo talk 06:51, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Moving them does nothing to solve this problem as the reader will still be redirected to the Toronto street, but now at a more ugly and cumbersome name. Unless disambiguation pages are created at the more generic name moving helps no one. Moreover the vast majority of the pages you moved will never even need to be disambiguated as in most cases Toronto is the only city in the world with a street by that name notable enough to have an article. - SimonP 06:15, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not subtracting information am I? I just noticed that some of your street names were familiar to me, but not in Toronto. Anyone who looks up the un-ambiguated street name will go directly to the Toronto street article unless there is another street with the same name at which time they will have the opportunity to choose which street they intended. Do you have a problem with that? If so, please explain because I'm trying to avoid confusion and not create conflict. hydnjo talk 05:53, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Excuse me but what is so special about Toronto? Per WP:WIWO, most streets do not deserve articles period. Radiant_* 09:45, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
- I responded on Radiant's talk page:
- I don't think that Toronto roads are special at all. In my comments at Wikipedia:Deletion policy/Minor roads I tried to explain what I saw and did when I noticed a flood of new articles with only Streetname as their title. I saw that most were non-notable streets in Toronto. Also, some had common streetnames (eg: Front Street). I didn't know exactly what to do but I thought that I would at least move them from Streetname to Streetname (Toronto) to reduce ambiguity (I probably should have alerted one of you guys instead). Anyway the folks that loaded the pages in the first place took issue with my having moved them to Streetname (Totonto) and they re-moved them back to Streetname. I agree entirely with you in setting some minimum threshold for streenames to become an article. If my comments suggest otherwise then I apologize for not stating my position clearly. I thought that the final sentence in my comments wouls make my position obvious, I agree with you. ;-) hydnjo talk 16:43, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Thank you very much for correcting my mistake. I do understand the distinction between the namespces, I just accidently used the wrong one. Thanks again for the very courteous and helpful message. Rmrfstar 04:40, 27 Mar 2005
- lol, thats really funny that I screwed that up to, I usually write to people's talk pages, sorry for requiring you to deal with another of my screw-ups. -- Rmrfstar 05:37, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
User:Onefool
Shwa? That's not me, I even find this doubly ironic, as I'm one of the people pushing to get User:Iasson banned for using public accounts. (See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Iasson) Whatever. humblefool® 23:42, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Shwa? is a humorous sound effect, like going what?, but more quizzically. And no problem, I was just worried you'd get an admin unfamiliar with what was going on to block me as a sockpuppet :) humblefool® 18:23, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
More Hound's Tooth
It's probably OK to leave it up with a stub notice. Some "Star Wars" fan is likely to latch onto it and even if the link goes bye-bye, there's probably lots of other sites that have the info. - Lucky 6.9 18:37, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Alas
Hehehe, I know of one of my family now thanks to you. I havent talked to him/her yet, but thanks for finding out--Wonderfool t(c)e) 15:28, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Hi; thanks muchly for apprising me. The block I originally gave the user expired after 24 hours. I haven't seen any dodgy edits from this user since March 27th, but I'll continue to do periodic checks of his/her contributions. Cheers, -- Hadal 07:13, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
VfD delisting
Hi Hydnjo, to answer your questions: first of all, the Virtual piano page apparently was never listed on VfD correctly: there is no link on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion to its subpage, so no one would ever have noticed its existence (how did you find it, by the way? I saw it going by this morning on Recent Changes). The normal policy is to list something for five days Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Unlisting_a_page_from_VfD at which time an administrator makes a decision based on consensus. It sure looks to me like we have consensus to keep the page under a new title. I'm a brand-new admin (as of two days ago) and have never done this; guess now's as good a time to learn as any. :-) Oh, and anyone can move a page -- click the "move this page" link, and it leaves a redirect behind at the old page name. Best, Antandrus 21:06, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- OK, I think I did that right. It's now here: Piano key frequencies and there are no double-redirects. A link to the archived deletion discussion is on the talk page. Antandrus 21:33, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Regarding the links, they do not change by themselves (this can be one of the most time-consuming tasks related to page moves). Usually leaving links as redirects is OK, but in this case the new article name is so different from the old that manual changing is probably in order. I'll get started; it's more fun than finishing my 1040. Happy editing! Antandrus
25A
Yeah, that would go there, to keep it sorted properly. Otherwise 25A goes with 250-259. --SPUI (talk) 15:34, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Edits
Better? More obsessed, perhaps. I got to where I am now in under three and a half months... Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Re: User:SPUI
Hi Hydnjo, I noticed your comment on Kim Bruning's page and thought I'd drop you a line. One, it looks like you inserted your comment in the middle of Kevin Rector's comments. In general, it's best to add your section at the bottom of the page. While occasionally it makes sense to respond to individual sentences or paragraphs of a comment, it's probably better not to insert a new section heading with in it. I hope you don't mind if I rearrange the sections to restore his comment. Regarding User:SPUI, I think that's unlikely. He has a quirky sense of humor, and added that himself (you'll also notice that he's listed himself as a suspected sockpupper of Jesus and of SPUI/jajaja). Actually, "SPUI" stands for "Single Point Urban Interchange"—SPUI is interested in roads and transportation, as you'll no doubt notice from his userpage. Sorry for eavesdropping, and hope this helps. — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:36, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I completely agree...
I agree with your comment (thanx for it), and that rule is quite breakable, and maybe arbitrary...
let's prepare a good argument for that rule,
thanx for the google link :)
--Greedyredbag 03:44, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)