Talk:Google Scholar: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edit by 41.222.178.12 (talk) to last version by David Eppstein |
|||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:The section appears to mix up two different topics: citation-ranking manipulation (mostly sourced here in a form that concerns individual authors, although publisher manipulation may also be a concern) and making content discoverable by journal publishers. Some properly sourced guidance on discoverability may be relevant here. I think citation manipulation is a broader topic than for Google Scholar specifically, and may be better placed elsewhere. In any case these two topics should be treated separately rather than as one thing. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 19:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
:The section appears to mix up two different topics: citation-ranking manipulation (mostly sourced here in a form that concerns individual authors, although publisher manipulation may also be a concern) and making content discoverable by journal publishers. Some properly sourced guidance on discoverability may be relevant here. I think citation manipulation is a broader topic than for Google Scholar specifically, and may be better placed elsewhere. In any case these two topics should be treated separately rather than as one thing. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 19:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
== With citations explain flexibility as the key difference between traditional and results based monitoring == |
|||
With citations and examples explain flexibility as the key difference between traditional and results based monitoring [[Special:Contributions/41.222.178.12|41.222.178.12]] ([[User talk:41.222.178.12|talk]]) 16:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:51, 12 June 2024
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Google Scholar. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Google Scholar at the Reference desk. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 555 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Not as good as described in this article
It seems that google scholar is not as good as described in this article. A perfect paper on the subject matter is written here You can check it out for yourself, what is written is really true. Would it thus be possible to include a milder version of my critic on this wikipedia page, like it exists in the German version of this article, without having it deleted? I thank you in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.39.218.10 (talk • contribs) .
- The German article referred to is aat http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Scholar
- would 194.39.218.10 please give some contact information? ---
- I found that your article was somewhat informative. However, it seemed to be highly biased against Google Scholar by blasting it at every opportunity. An example: "The "Googlemania" fueled by the enormous media publicity and laymen's ecstasy rubs off on Google Scholar and makes otherwise learned people disregard reality." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.202.42.70 (talk • contribs) .
"Google Scholar and academic libraries" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Google Scholar and academic libraries and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Google Scholar and academic libraries until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Assessment of contribution of family institution towards to children socialization.
I need a research report of that title 197.250.224.160 (talk) 13:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Search engine optimization for Google Scholar
Is the section Search engine optimization for Google Scholar really required or useful? I don't believe so, but I would like to consult other Wikipedians first. I can do stuff! (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The section appears to mix up two different topics: citation-ranking manipulation (mostly sourced here in a form that concerns individual authors, although publisher manipulation may also be a concern) and making content discoverable by journal publishers. Some properly sourced guidance on discoverability may be relevant here. I think citation manipulation is a broader topic than for Google Scholar specifically, and may be better placed elsewhere. In any case these two topics should be treated separately rather than as one thing. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Bibliographies articles
- Top-importance Bibliographies articles
- WikiProject Bibliographies
- C-Class Websites articles
- High-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of High-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- C-Class science articles
- Low-importance science articles
- C-Class Google articles
- Mid-importance Google articles
- WikiProject Google articles
- C-Class Academic Journal articles
- WikiProject Academic Journal articles