Jump to content

User talk:Xavcam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
re
Please fix vandalism properly
Line 1: Line 1:
==Leia Organa==
==Leia Organa==
It seems to have died down for the time being. If it picks up, I'll break out s-protect. — '''[[User:Deckiller|Deckill]][[User talk:Deckiller|er]]''' 23:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
It seems to have died down for the time being. If it picks up, I'll break out s-protect. — '''[[User:Deckiller|Deckill]][[User talk:Deckiller|er]]''' 23:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

== Please fix vandalism properly ==

Hi Xavcam, I notice that you are doing a lot of vandalism reversion. However, please make sure to do a thorough and complete job. Before reverting the last edit, you need to check if any previous edits were also vandalism, and revert those too. For example, on {{la|Puppy}}, you reverted a single vandal edit back to a previous version by a different IP vandal. Not good! I just fixed that. You need to check for and revert both vandal edits in such cases. On a heavily vandalized article, there may be numerous edits by several IP addresses which all need to be carefully checked and then reverted at once.

Thanks for your efforts at fighting vandalism. Please be sure to fight it more thoroughly in the future. Thanks. --[[User:Seattle Skier|Seattle Skier]] <small>[[User talk:Seattle Skier|(talk)]]</small> 03:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:36, 15 April 2007

Leia Organa

It seems to have died down for the time being. If it picks up, I'll break out s-protect. — Deckiller 23:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix vandalism properly

Hi Xavcam, I notice that you are doing a lot of vandalism reversion. However, please make sure to do a thorough and complete job. Before reverting the last edit, you need to check if any previous edits were also vandalism, and revert those too. For example, on Puppy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), you reverted a single vandal edit back to a previous version by a different IP vandal. Not good! I just fixed that. You need to check for and revert both vandal edits in such cases. On a heavily vandalized article, there may be numerous edits by several IP addresses which all need to be carefully checked and then reverted at once.

Thanks for your efforts at fighting vandalism. Please be sure to fight it more thoroughly in the future. Thanks. --Seattle Skier (talk) 03:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]