Template talk:Unreliable: Difference between revisions
Revert on wording change please |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Revert on wording change please == |
== Revert on wording change please == |
||
{{editprotected}} |
|||
I'm requesting that the wording be changed back. The issue at hand is not that the information is not verifiable--it is that it isn't verified. It doesn't matter if it ''can'' be verified--if the information is verifiable--if someone who reads the article can verify the information--the issue is that the information hasn't already been verified and presented as such. This new wording is bad--able and already done are too very different things and our policies require that we do it--not that we are able to. '''[[User:Miss Mondegreen|Miss Mondegreen]] | [[User talk:Miss Mondegreen|Talk]] 03:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)''' |
I'm requesting that the wording be changed back. The issue at hand is not that the information is not verifiable--it is that it isn't verified. It doesn't matter if it ''can'' be verified--if the information is verifiable--if someone who reads the article can verify the information--the issue is that the information hasn't already been verified and presented as such. This new wording is bad--able and already done are too very different things and our policies require that we do it--not that we are able to. '''[[User:Miss Mondegreen|Miss Mondegreen]] | [[User talk:Miss Mondegreen|Talk]] 03:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)''' |
||
:Okay, I changed it back. The page isn't protected though. —[[User:Centrx|Centrx]]→[[User talk:Centrx|''talk'']] • 04:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:02, 15 April 2007
Previous discussion
This template was created as a result of discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/Unreferenced GA task force#Types_of_referencing_problems. — Armed Blowfish (talk|mail) 02:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Revert on wording change please
I'm requesting that the wording be changed back. The issue at hand is not that the information is not verifiable--it is that it isn't verified. It doesn't matter if it can be verified--if the information is verifiable--if someone who reads the article can verify the information--the issue is that the information hasn't already been verified and presented as such. This new wording is bad--able and already done are too very different things and our policies require that we do it--not that we are able to. Miss Mondegreen | Talk 03:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I changed it back. The page isn't protected though. —Centrx→talk • 04:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)