Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 14: Line 14:
*
*
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Apocatastasis | 2 = Apokatastasis | discuss = | reason = See [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=apokatastasis%2Capocatastasis&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3 ngrams]. The two terms were equal-ish before 1980, but usage since 1980 dramatically favors the "k" variant, to the point of being 4x as popular since 2010 or so. High-quality academic sources on the topic use "k" as well ([https://books.google.com/books?id=YfGZAAAAQBAJ example]). | sig = [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 00:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC) | requester = SnowFire}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Apocatastasis | 2 = Apokatastasis | discuss = | reason = See [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=apokatastasis%2Capocatastasis&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3 ngrams]. The two terms were equal-ish before 1980, but usage since 1980 dramatically favors the "k" variant, to the point of being 4x as popular since 2010 or so. High-quality academic sources on the topic use "k" as well ([https://books.google.com/books?id=YfGZAAAAQBAJ example]). | sig = [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 00:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC) | requester = SnowFire}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Gleneagles (Scotland) | 2 = Glen Eagles | discuss = | reason = 1. over redirect 2. the valley (subject of this article) is called Glen Eagles on Ordnance Survey maps - see for instance https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.0&lat=56.24456&lon=-3.71484&layers=6&b=10&o=100&marker=56.243400,-3.711666 and https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.0&lat=56.24456&lon=-3.71484&layers=6&b=10&o=5&marker=56.243400,-3.711666 ... The famous hotel is called Gleneagles. It seems like the better known hotel name has been applied to the vallay in the article title for no good reason. Glen Eagles is the root source all all subjects named Gleneagles; no other subject is called Glen Eagles. | sig = [[User:Tagishsimon|Tagishsimon]] ([[User talk:Tagishsimon|talk]]) 01:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC) | requester = Tagishsimon}}


==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ====
==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ====

Revision as of 01:21, 17 June 2024

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

The bulk of the content relates to the former constituency. I wanted to preserve the edit history rather than cut and paste as you've suggested.--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do the two have significantly different borders? If not, I think it's standard practice to leave them as one page.  — Amakuru (talk) 07:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the two constituencies are significantly different. This map shows the arrondissement (old constituency) within the province (new constituency). The area of the constituency increased from 797 km2 to 3,857 km2. The electorate increased from 400,000 to 725,000.--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lullabying Because this article has been discussed, we will need another discussion in this case to change the title again. Feel free to click the "discuss" link above and add your rationale if you wish to continue. ASUKITE 13:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed