Talk:Chiropractic: Difference between revisions
Tryptofish (talk | contribs) Undid revision 1229785165 by 2403:4800:7486:FF53:F4A4:D71D:1AB8:D45D (talk) perennial complaint, no sources provided |
|||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
Can we include this information on this page? |
Can we include this information on this page? |
||
[[User:6cadc1f740|6cadc1f740]] ([[User talk:6cadc1f740|talk]]) 14:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
[[User:6cadc1f740|6cadc1f740]] ([[User talk:6cadc1f740|talk]]) 14:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Bigoted biased and inaccurate information regarding a well established healthcare profession. == |
|||
Chiropractic care is backed by scientific studies from around the world. |
|||
Chiropractors are government registered and regulated. |
|||
They are highly qualified healthcare professionals who study at university for a minimum of five years. |
|||
All chiropractors must also undertake continuing professional development courses every year. [[Special:Contributions/2403:4800:7486:FF53:F4A4:D71D:1AB8:D45D|2403:4800:7486:FF53:F4A4:D71D:1AB8:D45D]] ([[User talk:2403:4800:7486:FF53:F4A4:D71D:1AB8:D45D|talk]]) 18:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:29, 19 June 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chiropractic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
Do not feed the trolls! This article or its talk page has experienced trolling. The subject may be controversial or otherwise objectionable, but it is important to keep discussion on a high level. Do not get bogged down in endless debates that don't lead anywhere. Know when to deny recognition and refer to WP:PSCI, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:WIKIVOICE, or relevant notice-boards. Legal threats and trolling are never allowed! |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
The section "History" could use an update
The section "History" could use an update if sources are available.
Looks like the most recent info in that section is from 10+ years ago.
- 189.122.84.88 (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove "based of pseudoscientific ides" as chiropractic is evidence based.
The anti vaccine remark is unnecessary. There is no link between chiropractic and anti vaccine sentiment. 70.21.191.175 (talk) 06:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. No sources given, no prior consensus for change. Bon courage (talk) 06:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Big problem is that chiropractic is not evidence based. There is no evidence of chiropractic efficacy. I also notice that this is missing the founding of chiropractic by D.D Palmer in 1895. D. D. Palmer who pushed magnet healing and some vague concept of 'subluxation'. Per D. D. Palmer the found on chiropractic on chiropractic 'we must have a religious head, one who is the founder, as did Christ, Muhammad, Jo. Smith, Mrs. Eddy, Martin Luther and other who have founded religions.'
Chiropractic is a cult pretending to be medicine, per the found of Chiropractic.
Please see the D.D. Palmer page which has the information about the founding of Chiropractic, which for whatever reason is missing from the Chiropractic page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_David_Palmer#Founding_of_chiropractic
Can we include this information on this page? 6cadc1f740 (talk) 14:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class Chiropractic articles
- Top-importance Chiropractic articles
- WikiProject Chiropractic articles
- B-Class Alternative medicine articles
- B-Class Skepticism articles
- Top-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- B-Class Alternative views articles
- Mid-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles