Jump to content

Talk:Lithium: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
imported>30.128
beauty is in the eye of the beholder
New development version of this article is being worked on at Lithium/Temp.
Line 1: Line 1:
New development version of this article is being worked on at [[Lithium/Temp]].
Why was the -2 font removed for the external link area? It kinda looked nice.
-----


Why was the -2 font removed for the external link area? It kinda looked nice. --mav
:I can only guess at the motivations of the editor in questioin, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. :) Personally, I found the -2 font to be annoyingly hard to read and hard to hit with the mouse pointer. I also have a strong aversion to the font tag in principle. Any of these could be reasons why it was removed.

:I can only guess at the motivations of the editor in questioin, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. :) Personally, I found the -2 font to be annoyingly hard to read and hard to hit with the mouse pointer. I also have a strong aversion to the font tag in principle. Any of these could be reasons why it was removed. --Anon
-----
?? Doesn't most Lithium come from the same [[neutron]]-capture process that gives rise to [[Beryllium]] and [[Boron]]? --Anon

Revision as of 22:17, 21 July 2002

New development version of this article is being worked on at Lithium/Temp.


Why was the -2 font removed for the external link area? It kinda looked nice. --mav

I can only guess at the motivations of the editor in questioin, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. :) Personally, I found the -2 font to be annoyingly hard to read and hard to hit with the mouse pointer. I also have a strong aversion to the font tag in principle. Any of these could be reasons why it was removed. --Anon

?? Doesn't most Lithium come from the same neutron-capture process that gives rise to Beryllium and Boron? --Anon