Talk:Lithium: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
imported>30.128 beauty is in the eye of the beholder |
New development version of this article is being worked on at Lithium/Temp. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
New development version of this article is being worked on at [[Lithium/Temp]]. |
|||
⚫ | |||
----- |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | :I can only guess at the motivations of the editor in questioin, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. :) Personally, I found the -2 font to be annoyingly hard to read and hard to hit with the mouse pointer. I also have a strong aversion to the font tag in principle. Any of these could be reasons why it was removed. |
||
⚫ | :I can only guess at the motivations of the editor in questioin, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. :) Personally, I found the -2 font to be annoyingly hard to read and hard to hit with the mouse pointer. I also have a strong aversion to the font tag in principle. Any of these could be reasons why it was removed. --Anon |
||
----- |
|||
?? Doesn't most Lithium come from the same [[neutron]]-capture process that gives rise to [[Beryllium]] and [[Boron]]? --Anon |
Revision as of 22:17, 21 July 2002
New development version of this article is being worked on at Lithium/Temp.
Why was the -2 font removed for the external link area? It kinda looked nice. --mav
- I can only guess at the motivations of the editor in questioin, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. :) Personally, I found the -2 font to be annoyingly hard to read and hard to hit with the mouse pointer. I also have a strong aversion to the font tag in principle. Any of these could be reasons why it was removed. --Anon
?? Doesn't most Lithium come from the same neutron-capture process that gives rise to Beryllium and Boron? --Anon