Jump to content

Talk:Pantelleria Vecchia Bank Megalith: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Archaeology}}.
Alexor65 (talk | contribs)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


* The Roman imported obelisks as you can see [[List of obelisks in Rome]] and as out lined here [https://atlantipedia.ie/samples/tag/pantelleria-vecchia-bank/], Pantelleria was a major trading port where Egyptian jewellery where found. So it seems to me the simplest explanation is the megalith was a lost good at sea, probably during a storm it fell off board. The hole(s) through out it are probably means to secure or tie it during transports. [[User:Mightyname|Mightyname]] ([[User talk:Mightyname|talk]]) 21:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
* The Roman imported obelisks as you can see [[List of obelisks in Rome]] and as out lined here [https://atlantipedia.ie/samples/tag/pantelleria-vecchia-bank/], Pantelleria was a major trading port where Egyptian jewellery where found. So it seems to me the simplest explanation is the megalith was a lost good at sea, probably during a storm it fell off board. The hole(s) through out it are probably means to secure or tie it during transports. [[User:Mightyname|Mightyname]] ([[User talk:Mightyname|talk]]) 21:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

== Other researchers say it is a natural object ==

"natural conclusion that it is not a manufactured product, but a natural product." LINK: http://www.archeologiasubacquea.org/2015/09/monolite.html [[User:Alexor65|Alexor65]] ([[User talk:Alexor65|talk]]) 21:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:50, 29 June 2024

when above ground?

[edit]

it seems like bad editing when an article says "around 10,000 years ago" in one place and then "around 9500 years ago" a few lines later. --142.163.194.97 (talk) 23:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

anomalous?

[edit]

None of the (accessible) references use the word 'anomalous'. Perhaps 'unstudied' would be better. And of 'uncertain' origin? That implies there are ideas that are not quite proven. Is this the case? Then give them. If not, say "unknown".--142.163.194.97 (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Roman imported obelisks as you can see List of obelisks in Rome and as out lined here [1], Pantelleria was a major trading port where Egyptian jewellery where found. So it seems to me the simplest explanation is the megalith was a lost good at sea, probably during a storm it fell off board. The hole(s) through out it are probably means to secure or tie it during transports. Mightyname (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other researchers say it is a natural object

[edit]

"natural conclusion that it is not a manufactured product, but a natural product." LINK: http://www.archeologiasubacquea.org/2015/09/monolite.html Alexor65 (talk) 21:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]