Talk:Polish–Swedish War (1626–1629): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 12:25, 30 June 2024

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / Nordic / Polish / Russian & Soviet / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

B-class review

This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 00:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Result

@Olek Novy Regarding the result, the most reasonable conclusion to make from "highly favourable" is that it was a victory. I don't see how you don't agree but I think I have other sources explicitly stating victory for Sweden Gvssy (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also disagree with the result of this article, because of the inconsistency, as some call it a Polish-Lithuanian victory and some call it a Swedish one, I propose the following result

result : Truce of Altmark Birczenin (talk) 11:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What reputable sources call this a Polish–Lithuanian Victory? Gvssy (talk) 11:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what? you even read what I wrote, because I'm not talking about any source here, just the opinion of the majority. Birczenin (talk) 11:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The opinion of regular people has no merit to be included on a Wikipedia article, if it is not in a reputable source. That would be considered Original research (If I'm not mistaken) which is also against Wikipedia guidelines. Gvssy (talk) 11:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion? Your statement is poorly phrased, I pointed out to you that the result should be a truce in the altmark, not trying to prove whether it is a Swedish or a Polish-Lithuanian victory, in short neither this result nor that one is appropriate. Birczenin (talk) 12:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 :::what? you even read what I wrote, because I'm not talking about any source here, just the opinion of the majority. [[User:Birczenin|Birczenin]] ([[User talk:Birczenin|talk]]) 11:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 ::::The opinion of regular people has no merit to be included on a Wikipedia article, if it is not in a reputable source. That would be considered Original research (If I'm not mistaken) which is also against Wikipedia guidelines. [[User:Gvssy|Gvssy]] ([[User talk:Gvssy|talk]]) 11:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
+:::::Opinion? Your statement is poorly phrased, I pointed out to you that the result should be a truce in the altmark, not trying to prove whether it is a Swedish or a Polish-Lithuanian victory, in short neither this result nor that one is appropriate. [[User:Birczenin|Birczenin]] ([[User talk:Birczenin|talk]]) 12:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)