Talk:Gai Daigoji: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:51, 16 April 2007

	Anime and manga portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Gai/Gay

I was wondering if the name is spelled correctly. I remember in one episode Akito Tenkawa painted Gai/Gay's name on a miniature Aestevalis(sp?) and it was spelled Gay not Gai. What do you guys think? If I hear no objections I would like the title changed to this effect. --214.3.124.4 08:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Anonymous214.3.124.4 08:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking it was just a bad romanization. --Fattierob 16:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. And on the purely practical plane, it's a bad idea to go with as official a romanization like "Gay". Oy. --Gwern (contribs) 17:20 15 April 2007 (GMT)

I understand that it is romanizing in a sort of unexpected result, but if we are romanizing the article on Wikipedia (which is necessary to make it English based) then shouldn't we romanize it correctly? I guess I'm more concerned about accuracy of Wikipedia then anything else that might come of it. --214.3.124.4

Revision as of 17:20, 15 April 2007 edit Gwern (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 47,687 edits «" Gai/Gay " → "Gai/Gay", "Estavalis" → "Aestevalis", +"--", "i" → "I", "romanitization. " → "romanization. --", +":Yeah. And on the purely practical plane, it's a bad idea to go with as official a romanization like 'Gay'. Oy. ~~~"» ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:51, 16 April 2007 edit undo 214.3.124.4 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:Yeah. And on the purely practical plane, it's a bad idea to go with as official a romanization like "Gay". Oy. --[[User talk:Gwern \|Gwern]] [[Special:Contributions/Gwern \| (contribs)]] 17:20 [[15 April]] [[2007]] (GMT)		:Yeah. And on the purely practical plane, it's a bad idea to go with as official a romanization like "Gay". Oy. --[[User talk:Gwern \|Gwern]] [[Special:Contributions/Gwern \| (contribs)]] 17:20 [[15 April]] [[2007]] (GMT)

			:I understand that it is romanizing in a sort of unexpected result, but if we are romanizing the article on Wikipedia (which is necessary to make it English based) then shouldn't we romanize it correctly? I guess I'm more concerned about accuracy of Wikipedia then anything else that might come of it. --[[User:214.3.124.4\|214.3.124.4]]