Jump to content

User talk:Favonian: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by 2603:6081:2AF0:90D0:BDF5:A5AC:54E8:BD37 (talk) to last version by NoobThreePointOh
Cooking.
Tag: Reverted
Line 28: Line 28:
::Ok I understand it was not correct to edit-war, but i was not alone so why am I the only one to be blocked? It is not fair [[Special:Contributions/81.185.168.74|81.185.168.74]] ([[User talk:81.185.168.74|talk]]) 15:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::Ok I understand it was not correct to edit-war, but i was not alone so why am I the only one to be blocked? It is not fair [[Special:Contributions/81.185.168.74|81.185.168.74]] ([[User talk:81.185.168.74|talk]]) 15:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Italy vs France? Cooking? Fighting over who invented what? That sounds familiar. There's an SPI, there's a user who promised to be better. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Italy vs France? Cooking? Fighting over who invented what? That sounds familiar. There's an SPI, there's a user who promised to be better. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
::::To that IP user who's "discussing", you should have known better that discussing while cooking at the same time would call for dire consequences.[[Special:Contributions/102.158.130.25|102.158.130.25]] ([[User talk:102.158.130.25|talk]]) 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


==Failed unprotection request==
==Failed unprotection request==

Revision as of 12:55, 4 July 2024

Porchetta

Dear @Favonian, I would like to understand why you blocked me. I was restoring referenced information deleted by @JackkBrown. You can see that this user removed content for no reason here for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Porchetta&oldid=1218557819 I tried to talk in the talk page, I even provided a new reference supporting the version that I am trying to restore (it is in the talk page).

Could you have a look in the talk section too? the content removed by JackkBrown was supported by references and it is not fair to delete it and block me when I was just trying to restore it.

In any case could you tell me how to proceed in this case, seeing that I am doing something wrong. 81.185.168.74 (talk) 14:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You kept edit-warring using IPs from the range 81.185.160.0/20 (which has previously been blocked for similar disruption on the Macaron article), and when I put a stop to that, you switched to 77.205.152.210. When you can't take a hint, more forceful methods are applied. I have no stake in the discussion, which will talk place at Talk:Porchetta and nowhere else. Favonian (talk) 14:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I understand it was not correct to edit-war, but i was not alone so why am I the only one to be blocked? It is not fair 81.185.168.74 (talk) 15:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Italy vs France? Cooking? Fighting over who invented what? That sounds familiar. There's an SPI, there's a user who promised to be better. Drmies (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To that IP user who's "discussing", you should have known better that discussing while cooking at the same time would call for dire consequences.102.158.130.25 (talk) 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failed unprotection request

I was actually requesting a downgrade in edit-protection (not move-) from template- to semi- access. However, I am still unconvinced by the decline reason. Please take your time and explain to me.197.2.244.222 (talk) 10:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should probably ask the administrator who rejected the request. In spite of our usernames having the same initial letter, we are not identical. Favonian (talk) 11:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was attempting to get input from another administrator (i.e. you) who is more responsible at handling RFPP requests, however I am drawing Firefangledfeathers's attention in this case.197.2.244.222 (talk) 11:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understood the request was for a downgrade in protection. I'm sorry to hear you're unconvinced by the decline reason. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please unambiguously explain as soon as possible before those hooligans who are "best known for" creating – well, this edit summary explains everything.197.2.244.222 (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion does not really concern me, so I must ask you to continue elsewhere. One of our perennial gits appears to have embarked on his weekend pastime, so the page is about to be protected. Favonian (talk) 12:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

perennial gits. You do have a way with words, User F*.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, User Multi-B, I aim to displease – some people. Favonian (talk) 12:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you score an f-ing goal against the f-ing Germans, sir. Drmies (talk) 20:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On advice from counsel, I take the fifth. Favonian (talk) 20:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry F. Drmies (talk) 21:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]