Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Reconrabbit (talk | contribs) Progress check |
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Adding nominator information |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Good article tools}} |
{{Good article tools}} |
||
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
||
'''Nominator:''' {{User|Magentic Manifestations}} 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]] ([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Reconrabbit|contribs]]) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC) |
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]] ([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Reconrabbit|contribs]]) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:01, 9 July 2024
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.
Prose
- Lead provides a concise summary of the article's topics.
References
- References are formatted correctly.
- External links appropriate.
- No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias.
Sources check:
Images
- All images are tagged with licenses.
- The infobox and caption states that the location is abbreviated "CrocBank" but this is never stated in the article or with a reference.
- There are a lot of images, and one of the two pictures of the reptile demonstration building could be removed.
Stability, neutrality, focus
- There are no edit wars, content disputes in the article's recent history. No maintenance tags on the article either.
- Article is written from a neutral point of view, and is not promotional of the topic.
- Broadly covers relevant information to the subject.
- The information on reptile stock may be too detailed and not generally useful to a reader. Is this kind of list standard in other wildlife conservation area articles?
Good Article review progress box
|