Jump to content

Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Progress check
m Adding nominator information
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Good article tools}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>

'''Nominator:''' {{User|Magentic Manifestations}} 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Reconrabbit|contribs]]) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Reconrabbit|contribs]]) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:01, 9 July 2024

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.

Prose

  • Lead provides a concise summary of the article's topics. checkY

References

  • References are formatted correctly. checkY
  • External links appropriate. checkY
  • No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias. checkY

Sources check:

Images

  • All images are tagged with licenses. checkY
  • Orange tickY The infobox and caption states that the location is abbreviated "CrocBank" but this is never stated in the article or with a reference.
  • Orange tickY There are a lot of images, and one of the two pictures of the reptile demonstration building could be removed.

Stability, neutrality, focus

  • There are no edit wars, content disputes in the article's recent history. No maintenance tags on the article either. checkY
  • Article is written from a neutral point of view, and is not promotional of the topic. checkY
  • Broadly covers relevant information to the subject. checkY
  • Orange tickY The information on reptile stock may be too detailed and not generally useful to a reader. Is this kind of list standard in other wildlife conservation area articles?
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. [[MOS:|MoS]] () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed