Jump to content

Talk:Madras Crocodile Bank Trust/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→GA Review: Reply
Checking sources
Line 7: Line 7:
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]] ([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Reconrabbit|contribs]]) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]] ([[User talk:Reconrabbit|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Reconrabbit|contribs]]) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


⚫
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
:@[[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]] Thanks for taking it up. Will address the comments as they come! [[User:Magentic Manifestations|Magentic Manifestations]] ([[User talk:Magentic Manifestations|talk]]) 15:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:@[[User:Reconrabbit|Reconrabbit]] Thanks for taking it up. Will address the comments as they come! [[User:Magentic Manifestations|Magentic Manifestations]] ([[User talk:Magentic Manifestations|talk]]) 15:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


⚫
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.
Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.


Line 19: Line 19:
* External links appropriate. {{Tick}}
* External links appropriate. {{Tick}}
* No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias. {{Tick}}
* No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias. {{Tick}}
Sources check, numbers based on [[Special:PermanentLink/1233525114|this revision]]:
Sources check:
{{Columns-list|
{{Columns-list|
* [1] {{Tick}}
*
* [2] {{Tick}}
* [5] {{Mby}} Date given is inconsistent and the source for this information does not look great. 1975 looks to be the correct year which agrees with [https://wildlife.odisha.gov.in/crocodileconservation this site] and [6].
* [6] {{Tick}}
* [13] {{Tick}}
* [37] {{Tick}}
* [47] {{Mby}} Not a very strong source, primary research only cited once. There is a possible better reference from C. J. Stevenson [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269286880_Conservation_of_the_Indian_Gharial_Gavialis_gangeticus_successes_and_failures_Indian_Gharial_Conservation_Successes_and_Failures here].
* [57] {{Cross}} Self-published source on a blog. Better references are available.
* [77] {{Tick}}
}}
}}


Revision as of 16:27, 9 July 2024

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 10:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit Thanks for taking it up. Will address the comments as they come! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I copy-edited some minor things for clarity and grammar last week, and since no one else has started a review I will do it now.

Prose

  • Lead provides a concise summary of the article's topics. checkY

References

  • References are formatted correctly. checkY
  • External links appropriate. checkY
  • No copyright violations found, version is distinct from other language Wikipedias. checkY

Sources check, numbers based on this revision:

  • [1] checkY
  • [2] checkY
  • [5] Orange tickY Date given is inconsistent and the source for this information does not look great. 1975 looks to be the correct year which agrees with this site and [6].
  • [6] checkY
  • [13] checkY
  • [37] checkY
  • [47] Orange tickY Not a very strong source, primary research only cited once. There is a possible better reference from C. J. Stevenson here.
  • [57] ☒N Self-published source on a blog. Better references are available.
  • [77] checkY

Images

  • All images are tagged with licenses. checkY
  • Orange tickY The infobox and caption states that the location is abbreviated "CrocBank" but this is never stated in the article or with a reference.
  • Orange tickY There are a lot of images, and one of the two pictures of the reptile demonstration building could be removed.

Stability, neutrality, focus

  • There are no edit wars, content disputes in the article's recent history. No maintenance tags on the article either. checkY
  • Article is written from a neutral point of view, and is not promotional of the topic. checkY
  • Broadly covers relevant information to the subject. checkY
  • Orange tickY The information on reptile stock may be too detailed and not generally useful to a reader. Is this kind of list standard in other wildlife conservation area articles?
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. [[MOS:|MoS]] () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Madras_Crocodile_Bank_Trust/GA1&oldid=1233539129"