Talk:Mike Wing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tag: |
→Request for review of this article: as it was, it wasn't faithful to reliable sources. |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This article was recently changed substantially with sparse references and many references removed. Someone should substantiate the changes with references. The neutrality of the article should also be checked. [[User:Minorseventh|Minorseventh]] ([[User talk:Minorseventh|talk]]) 02:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC) |
This article was recently changed substantially with sparse references and many references removed. Someone should substantiate the changes with references. The neutrality of the article should also be checked. [[User:Minorseventh|Minorseventh]] ([[User talk:Minorseventh|talk]]) 02:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
:I reverted those edits because it completely whitewashed the article. It should be noted that this fellow has gotten in trouble more than once. If I were him or his family, I wouldn't be too happy about all the information gathered in one place. When I wrote it, I looked for good info, too, and included it, but that was sparse. -- [[User:Ke4roh|ke4roh]] ([[User talk:Ke4roh|talk]]) 17:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 11 July 2024
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Request for review of this article
[edit]This article was recently changed substantially with sparse references and many references removed. Someone should substantiate the changes with references. The neutrality of the article should also be checked. Minorseventh (talk) 02:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- I reverted those edits because it completely whitewashed the article. It should be noted that this fellow has gotten in trouble more than once. If I were him or his family, I wouldn't be too happy about all the information gathered in one place. When I wrote it, I looked for good info, too, and included it, but that was sparse. -- ke4roh (talk) 17:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)