Jump to content

Talk:Mahabharata: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
Line 73: Line 73:
<ref>https://youtube.com/YmD5qaVa6bU?si=0MuH9aFdZhCFD1TF</ref> [[User:Pranav kantak|Pranav kantak]] ([[User talk:Pranav kantak|talk]]) 08:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
<ref>https://youtube.com/YmD5qaVa6bU?si=0MuH9aFdZhCFD1TF</ref> [[User:Pranav kantak|Pranav kantak]] ([[User talk:Pranav kantak|talk]]) 08:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Charliehdb|Charliehdb]] ([[User talk:Charliehdb|talk]]) 10:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Charliehdb|Charliehdb]] ([[User talk:Charliehdb|talk]]) 10:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

== James L. Fitzgerald (2018) analysis ==

Recently Fitzgeral proposed a 5 stage development of Mahabharata, explained in Dokter-Mersch (2023): 1) Before 400 BCE, it was an oral composition called "Bharata," prior to invention of writing in India. 2) Between 400 and 50 BCE, when "although writing was invented in this period [...] the composition, preservation, and transmission of this Bharata was still oral. 3) Between 50 BCE and 50 CE, "the creation and promulgation of a written Sanskrit Mahabharata." 4) Between 50 and 150 CE "[t]he transmission [...] continued orally because, non-Sanskritic audience needed explanations in their local language to understand the text," along with a major written addition. 5) Between 150 and 350 CE, the last written addition took place.

Ref:
Dokter-Mersch, Sanne, (2023). "Orality in a world of manuscripts..." in: Manuscript and Text Cultures, Vol. 2, Number 2, pp. 206.

It would be fit to incorporate this perspective in the Mahabharata's article.--[[User:Carlos Eduardo Aramayo B.|Carlos Eduardo Aramayo B.]] ([[User talk:Carlos Eduardo Aramayo B.|talk]]) 03:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:51, 13 July 2024

Former good articleMahabharata was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 9, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 15, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 19, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


Mahabharata is a 5th Veda

Mahabharata is a 5th Veda according to Devi bhagwat Purana, Mahabharata which contains the following five characteristics :-- (1) Creation of the universe, (2) Secondary creation, (3) Dynasties (4) Manvantaras and (5) The description of Manus and other kings. Mahâbhârata writen by Vedavyâsa, characterised by these five things. This is known as the fifth Veda and Itihâsa (history.)Source of this Topic Ambaputra (talk) 06:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahabharata Tatparya Nirnaya by Madhwacharya

'Mahabharata Tatparya Nirnaya'. It has 5000+ shlokas, in 1st Adhyaya Madhwacharya help to prove Mahabharata as Panchama Veda.

Bhaskarna (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2024

Mahabharatha was also translated to Telugu somewhere between 11 Century CE and 14 Century CE by Kavitrayam (Trinity of poets), consisting of Nannayya, Thikkana and Yerrapragada (also known as Errana) with title ఆంధ్ర మహాభారతం(read Andhra Mahabharatam). Jyothiprasad.buddha (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2024

"Change astronomical dating of Mahabharata in compilation of text row that is 5561 BCE by professor Nilesh Nilkanth Oak [1] Pranav kantak (talk) 07:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 10:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2024 (2)

astronomical dating of 5561 BCE for Mahabharat text as researched by Nilesh Oak [2] Pranav kantak (talk) 08:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 10:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James L. Fitzgerald (2018) analysis

Recently Fitzgeral proposed a 5 stage development of Mahabharata, explained in Dokter-Mersch (2023): 1) Before 400 BCE, it was an oral composition called "Bharata," prior to invention of writing in India. 2) Between 400 and 50 BCE, when "although writing was invented in this period [...] the composition, preservation, and transmission of this Bharata was still oral. 3) Between 50 BCE and 50 CE, "the creation and promulgation of a written Sanskrit Mahabharata." 4) Between 50 and 150 CE "[t]he transmission [...] continued orally because, non-Sanskritic audience needed explanations in their local language to understand the text," along with a major written addition. 5) Between 150 and 350 CE, the last written addition took place.

Ref: Dokter-Mersch, Sanne, (2023). "Orality in a world of manuscripts..." in: Manuscript and Text Cultures, Vol. 2, Number 2, pp. 206.

It would be fit to incorporate this perspective in the Mahabharata's article.--Carlos Eduardo Aramayo B. (talk) 03:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]